Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing

The design and retentive properties of implant-abutment connectors affect the mechanical resistance of implants. A number of studies have been carried out to compare the efficacy of connecting mechanisms between abutment and fixture. Objectives: The aims of this study were: 1) to compare 3 implant-a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cleide Gisele Ribeiro, Maria Luiza Cabral Maia, Susanne S. Scherrer, Antonio Carlos Cardoso, H. W. Anselm Wiskott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2011-08-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000400019
_version_ 1818549555772260352
author Cleide Gisele Ribeiro
Maria Luiza Cabral Maia
Susanne S. Scherrer
Antonio Carlos Cardoso
H. W. Anselm Wiskott
author_facet Cleide Gisele Ribeiro
Maria Luiza Cabral Maia
Susanne S. Scherrer
Antonio Carlos Cardoso
H. W. Anselm Wiskott
author_sort Cleide Gisele Ribeiro
collection DOAJ
description The design and retentive properties of implant-abutment connectors affect the mechanical resistance of implants. A number of studies have been carried out to compare the efficacy of connecting mechanisms between abutment and fixture. Objectives: The aims of this study were: 1) to compare 3 implant-abutment interfaces (external hexagon, internal hexagon and cone-in-cone) regarding the fatigue resistance of the prosthetic screw, 2) to evaluate the corresponding mode of failure, and 3) to compare the results of this study with data obtained in previous studies on Nobel Biocare and Straumann connectors. Materials and METHODS: In order to duplicate the alternating and multivectorial intraoral loading pattern, the specimens were submitted to the rotating cantilever beam test. The implants, abutments and restoration analogs were spun around their longitudinal axes while a perpendicular force was applied to the external end. The objective was to determine the force level at which 50% of the specimens survived 10(6) load cycles. The mean force levels at which 50% failed and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were determined using the staircase procedure. RESULTS: The external hexagon interface presented better than the cone-in-cone and internal hexagon interfaces. There was no significant difference between the cone-in-cone and internal hex interfaces. Conclusion: Although internal connections present a more favorable design, this study did not show any advantage in terms of strength. The external hexagon connector used in this study yielded similar results to those obtained in a previous study with Nobel Biocare and Straumann systems. However, the internal connections (cone-in-cone and internal hexagon) were mechanically inferior compared to previous results.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:34:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4552f51501fd440e80949b02fd543ed9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:34:52Z
publishDate 2011-08-01
publisher University of São Paulo
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
spelling doaj.art-4552f51501fd440e80949b02fd543ed92022-12-22T00:30:58ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652011-08-01194413420Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testingCleide Gisele RibeiroMaria Luiza Cabral MaiaSusanne S. ScherrerAntonio Carlos CardosoH. W. Anselm WiskottThe design and retentive properties of implant-abutment connectors affect the mechanical resistance of implants. A number of studies have been carried out to compare the efficacy of connecting mechanisms between abutment and fixture. Objectives: The aims of this study were: 1) to compare 3 implant-abutment interfaces (external hexagon, internal hexagon and cone-in-cone) regarding the fatigue resistance of the prosthetic screw, 2) to evaluate the corresponding mode of failure, and 3) to compare the results of this study with data obtained in previous studies on Nobel Biocare and Straumann connectors. Materials and METHODS: In order to duplicate the alternating and multivectorial intraoral loading pattern, the specimens were submitted to the rotating cantilever beam test. The implants, abutments and restoration analogs were spun around their longitudinal axes while a perpendicular force was applied to the external end. The objective was to determine the force level at which 50% of the specimens survived 10(6) load cycles. The mean force levels at which 50% failed and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were determined using the staircase procedure. RESULTS: The external hexagon interface presented better than the cone-in-cone and internal hexagon interfaces. There was no significant difference between the cone-in-cone and internal hex interfaces. Conclusion: Although internal connections present a more favorable design, this study did not show any advantage in terms of strength. The external hexagon connector used in this study yielded similar results to those obtained in a previous study with Nobel Biocare and Straumann systems. However, the internal connections (cone-in-cone and internal hexagon) were mechanically inferior compared to previous results.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000400019Dental implantsFatigueProsthesis failure
spellingShingle Cleide Gisele Ribeiro
Maria Luiza Cabral Maia
Susanne S. Scherrer
Antonio Carlos Cardoso
H. W. Anselm Wiskott
Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Dental implants
Fatigue
Prosthesis failure
title Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing
title_full Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing
title_fullStr Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing
title_full_unstemmed Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing
title_short Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing
title_sort resistance of three implant abutment interfaces to fatigue testing
topic Dental implants
Fatigue
Prosthesis failure
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000400019
work_keys_str_mv AT cleidegiseleribeiro resistanceofthreeimplantabutmentinterfacestofatiguetesting
AT marialuizacabralmaia resistanceofthreeimplantabutmentinterfacestofatiguetesting
AT susannesscherrer resistanceofthreeimplantabutmentinterfacestofatiguetesting
AT antoniocarloscardoso resistanceofthreeimplantabutmentinterfacestofatiguetesting
AT hwanselmwiskott resistanceofthreeimplantabutmentinterfacestofatiguetesting