Self-Reported Well-Being Indicators and Case Identification of Common Mental Health Disorders in Routinely Collected Health Data

Introduction Common mental health disorders (CMD) are significant contributors to impaired health and well-being, and drive greater health resource utilisation. Electronic health records (EHR) are increasingly used for case identification of CMD when ascertaining social determinants of mental health...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Thompson, Ann John, Richard Fry, Alan Watkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2020-12-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/1618
_version_ 1797427633977294848
author Daniel Thompson
Ann John
Richard Fry
Alan Watkins
author_facet Daniel Thompson
Ann John
Richard Fry
Alan Watkins
author_sort Daniel Thompson
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Common mental health disorders (CMD) are significant contributors to impaired health and well-being, and drive greater health resource utilisation. Electronic health records (EHR) are increasingly used for case identification of CMD when ascertaining social determinants of mental health. We seek to compare self-reported well-being indicators in groups identified using EHR-based CMD methods. Objectives and Approach The National Survey for Wales (NSW) contains self-reported well-being indicators (Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, WEMWBS) recorded annually on ~7,000 individuals. We combined data from two NSWs and linked well-being indicators with Welsh Longitudinal General Practice (WLGP) data within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank, using individual response dates. We then used WGLP data to algorithmically derive identifiers of CMD cases within survey respondents. This individual-level linkage enables a comparison of NSW responses in CMD and non-CMD cases, and to assess sensitivity and specificity of the current CMD algorithm. Results Survey participants comprised 18,450 adults aged 16+ and living in Wales during 16/17 or 18/19. WEMWBS responses indicate 2,338 (12.6%) participants could be considered possibly depressed, and 2,268 (12.3%) probably depressed with low mental well-being (LMW). For participants with LMW, a 42/58 percentage split is observed between male/female respondents, compared to a 45/55 respective split of those not identified with LMW. Participants with LMW recorded low measures for overall satisfaction with life, 998 (44%) reported a value of 5 or less (/10) compared to 1123 (7%) participants not identified with LMW. Similarly, 828 (37%) participants identified with LMW reported 5 or less (/10) on the life worthwhile index, compared to 800 (5%) of non-LMW participants. Conclusion / Implications Linkage to the NSW provides a rich data source to compare objective well-being to algorithmically derived CMD cases from routinely collected primary care data. The individual-level linkage involved will allow for the wider determinants of mental health disorders to be examined.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:47:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4570b951034e413f84cecaf98ff33c87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-4908
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:47:11Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Swansea University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Population Data Science
spelling doaj.art-4570b951034e413f84cecaf98ff33c872023-12-02T15:09:10ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082020-12-015510.23889/ijpds.v5i5.1618Self-Reported Well-Being Indicators and Case Identification of Common Mental Health Disorders in Routinely Collected Health DataDaniel Thompson0Ann John1Richard Fry2Alan Watkins3Swansea UniversitySwansea UniversitySwansea UniversitySwansea UniversityIntroduction Common mental health disorders (CMD) are significant contributors to impaired health and well-being, and drive greater health resource utilisation. Electronic health records (EHR) are increasingly used for case identification of CMD when ascertaining social determinants of mental health. We seek to compare self-reported well-being indicators in groups identified using EHR-based CMD methods. Objectives and Approach The National Survey for Wales (NSW) contains self-reported well-being indicators (Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, WEMWBS) recorded annually on ~7,000 individuals. We combined data from two NSWs and linked well-being indicators with Welsh Longitudinal General Practice (WLGP) data within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank, using individual response dates. We then used WGLP data to algorithmically derive identifiers of CMD cases within survey respondents. This individual-level linkage enables a comparison of NSW responses in CMD and non-CMD cases, and to assess sensitivity and specificity of the current CMD algorithm. Results Survey participants comprised 18,450 adults aged 16+ and living in Wales during 16/17 or 18/19. WEMWBS responses indicate 2,338 (12.6%) participants could be considered possibly depressed, and 2,268 (12.3%) probably depressed with low mental well-being (LMW). For participants with LMW, a 42/58 percentage split is observed between male/female respondents, compared to a 45/55 respective split of those not identified with LMW. Participants with LMW recorded low measures for overall satisfaction with life, 998 (44%) reported a value of 5 or less (/10) compared to 1123 (7%) participants not identified with LMW. Similarly, 828 (37%) participants identified with LMW reported 5 or less (/10) on the life worthwhile index, compared to 800 (5%) of non-LMW participants. Conclusion / Implications Linkage to the NSW provides a rich data source to compare objective well-being to algorithmically derived CMD cases from routinely collected primary care data. The individual-level linkage involved will allow for the wider determinants of mental health disorders to be examined.https://ijpds.org/article/view/1618
spellingShingle Daniel Thompson
Ann John
Richard Fry
Alan Watkins
Self-Reported Well-Being Indicators and Case Identification of Common Mental Health Disorders in Routinely Collected Health Data
International Journal of Population Data Science
title Self-Reported Well-Being Indicators and Case Identification of Common Mental Health Disorders in Routinely Collected Health Data
title_full Self-Reported Well-Being Indicators and Case Identification of Common Mental Health Disorders in Routinely Collected Health Data
title_fullStr Self-Reported Well-Being Indicators and Case Identification of Common Mental Health Disorders in Routinely Collected Health Data
title_full_unstemmed Self-Reported Well-Being Indicators and Case Identification of Common Mental Health Disorders in Routinely Collected Health Data
title_short Self-Reported Well-Being Indicators and Case Identification of Common Mental Health Disorders in Routinely Collected Health Data
title_sort self reported well being indicators and case identification of common mental health disorders in routinely collected health data
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/1618
work_keys_str_mv AT danielthompson selfreportedwellbeingindicatorsandcaseidentificationofcommonmentalhealthdisordersinroutinelycollectedhealthdata
AT annjohn selfreportedwellbeingindicatorsandcaseidentificationofcommonmentalhealthdisordersinroutinelycollectedhealthdata
AT richardfry selfreportedwellbeingindicatorsandcaseidentificationofcommonmentalhealthdisordersinroutinelycollectedhealthdata
AT alanwatkins selfreportedwellbeingindicatorsandcaseidentificationofcommonmentalhealthdisordersinroutinelycollectedhealthdata