“Breathe, Plan, Write, and Evaluate”: the effects of an SRSD intervention and instructional feedback on 4th graders’ writing and motivation

IntroductionOver the years, extensive literature attested to the value of the Self-Regulation Strategy Development model (SRSD) for writing. Additionally, feedback has been recognized as essential to the teaching and learning of writing, and as supporting evidence-based instructional models for writ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreia Nunes, Carolina Cordeiro, Renata Rocha, Teresa Limpo, São Luís Castro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1305771/full
_version_ 1797295203139190784
author Andreia Nunes
Carolina Cordeiro
Renata Rocha
Teresa Limpo
São Luís Castro
author_facet Andreia Nunes
Carolina Cordeiro
Renata Rocha
Teresa Limpo
São Luís Castro
author_sort Andreia Nunes
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionOver the years, extensive literature attested to the value of the Self-Regulation Strategy Development model (SRSD) for writing. Additionally, feedback has been recognized as essential to the teaching and learning of writing, and as supporting evidence-based instructional models for writing. However, little is known of the effects of combining evidence-based practice models, such as SRSD, with instructional feedback, as well as with a component of meditation. The present study aimed to study the effects of an SRSD intervention and to study the importance of instructional feedback within an SRSD intervention.MethodA total of 69 primary students (4th graders) participated in this study. The study was divided into two phases: in Phase 1, two classes participated in a SRSD intervention program (SRSD-1 group; N = 33), whereas two others received regular writing instruction (control group; N = 36); in Phase 2, the previous control group received the SRSD intervention with or without instructional feedback (SRSD-2 with feedback, N = 19, vs. SRSD-2 without feedback, N = 17, groups), while the SRSD received regular writing instruction (SRSD-1 group).ResultsThe effectiveness of the intervention was confirmed in both phases for the writing outcomes variables, but not for motivation. Overall, our study showed that the SRSD intervention with an additional meditation component was effective in improving students’ writing planning for all intervention participants. Additionally, writing quality and writing structure improved among those with lower scores at the pretest. Concerning motivation, we only found an effect on self-efficacy for ideation.DiscussionWe expect the current research to stimulate future examinations of the value of providing students with instructional feedback in writing interventions.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T21:43:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-457213a11e754db289c507348eb9f812
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2504-284X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T21:43:21Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Education
spelling doaj.art-457213a11e754db289c507348eb9f8122024-02-26T04:16:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2024-02-01910.3389/feduc.2024.13057711305771“Breathe, Plan, Write, and Evaluate”: the effects of an SRSD intervention and instructional feedback on 4th graders’ writing and motivationAndreia Nunes0Carolina Cordeiro1Renata Rocha2Teresa Limpo3São Luís Castro4Center for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, PortugalCIPEM/INET-md, School of Education, Polytechnic of Porto, Porto, PortugalCenter for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, PortugalCenter for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, PortugalCenter for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, PortugalIntroductionOver the years, extensive literature attested to the value of the Self-Regulation Strategy Development model (SRSD) for writing. Additionally, feedback has been recognized as essential to the teaching and learning of writing, and as supporting evidence-based instructional models for writing. However, little is known of the effects of combining evidence-based practice models, such as SRSD, with instructional feedback, as well as with a component of meditation. The present study aimed to study the effects of an SRSD intervention and to study the importance of instructional feedback within an SRSD intervention.MethodA total of 69 primary students (4th graders) participated in this study. The study was divided into two phases: in Phase 1, two classes participated in a SRSD intervention program (SRSD-1 group; N = 33), whereas two others received regular writing instruction (control group; N = 36); in Phase 2, the previous control group received the SRSD intervention with or without instructional feedback (SRSD-2 with feedback, N = 19, vs. SRSD-2 without feedback, N = 17, groups), while the SRSD received regular writing instruction (SRSD-1 group).ResultsThe effectiveness of the intervention was confirmed in both phases for the writing outcomes variables, but not for motivation. Overall, our study showed that the SRSD intervention with an additional meditation component was effective in improving students’ writing planning for all intervention participants. Additionally, writing quality and writing structure improved among those with lower scores at the pretest. Concerning motivation, we only found an effect on self-efficacy for ideation.DiscussionWe expect the current research to stimulate future examinations of the value of providing students with instructional feedback in writing interventions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1305771/fullwritingfeedbackmotivationSRSDattentionchildren
spellingShingle Andreia Nunes
Carolina Cordeiro
Renata Rocha
Teresa Limpo
São Luís Castro
“Breathe, Plan, Write, and Evaluate”: the effects of an SRSD intervention and instructional feedback on 4th graders’ writing and motivation
Frontiers in Education
writing
feedback
motivation
SRSD
attention
children
title “Breathe, Plan, Write, and Evaluate”: the effects of an SRSD intervention and instructional feedback on 4th graders’ writing and motivation
title_full “Breathe, Plan, Write, and Evaluate”: the effects of an SRSD intervention and instructional feedback on 4th graders’ writing and motivation
title_fullStr “Breathe, Plan, Write, and Evaluate”: the effects of an SRSD intervention and instructional feedback on 4th graders’ writing and motivation
title_full_unstemmed “Breathe, Plan, Write, and Evaluate”: the effects of an SRSD intervention and instructional feedback on 4th graders’ writing and motivation
title_short “Breathe, Plan, Write, and Evaluate”: the effects of an SRSD intervention and instructional feedback on 4th graders’ writing and motivation
title_sort breathe plan write and evaluate the effects of an srsd intervention and instructional feedback on 4th graders writing and motivation
topic writing
feedback
motivation
SRSD
attention
children
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1305771/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andreianunes breatheplanwriteandevaluatetheeffectsofansrsdinterventionandinstructionalfeedbackon4thgraderswritingandmotivation
AT carolinacordeiro breatheplanwriteandevaluatetheeffectsofansrsdinterventionandinstructionalfeedbackon4thgraderswritingandmotivation
AT renatarocha breatheplanwriteandevaluatetheeffectsofansrsdinterventionandinstructionalfeedbackon4thgraderswritingandmotivation
AT teresalimpo breatheplanwriteandevaluatetheeffectsofansrsdinterventionandinstructionalfeedbackon4thgraderswritingandmotivation
AT saoluiscastro breatheplanwriteandevaluatetheeffectsofansrsdinterventionandinstructionalfeedbackon4thgraderswritingandmotivation