Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor

ObjectivePatients with essential tremor (ET) may experience cognitive-affective impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), has been shown to be beneficial for refractory ET. Ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucía Triguero-Cueva, Bartolomé Marín-Romero, Carlos Javier Madrid-Navarro, María José Pérez-Navarro, Benjamin Iáñez-Velasco, Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos, Majed Jouma Katati, Francisco Escamilla-Sevilla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1222592/full
_version_ 1797644954216955904
author Lucía Triguero-Cueva
Lucía Triguero-Cueva
Bartolomé Marín-Romero
Carlos Javier Madrid-Navarro
Carlos Javier Madrid-Navarro
María José Pérez-Navarro
Benjamin Iáñez-Velasco
Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos
Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos
Majed Jouma Katati
Francisco Escamilla-Sevilla
Francisco Escamilla-Sevilla
author_facet Lucía Triguero-Cueva
Lucía Triguero-Cueva
Bartolomé Marín-Romero
Carlos Javier Madrid-Navarro
Carlos Javier Madrid-Navarro
María José Pérez-Navarro
Benjamin Iáñez-Velasco
Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos
Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos
Majed Jouma Katati
Francisco Escamilla-Sevilla
Francisco Escamilla-Sevilla
author_sort Lucía Triguero-Cueva
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivePatients with essential tremor (ET) may experience cognitive-affective impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), has been shown to be beneficial for refractory ET. However, there is little evidence regarding the possible neuropsychological effects of PSA-DBS on patients with ET, and there are few studies comparing it with VIM-DBS in this population.In this study, we aim to present the evaluation protocol and neuropsychological battery as used in an ongoing trial of DBS for ET comparing the already mentioned targets.MethodsAs part of a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of PSA-DBS vs. VIM-DBS, 11 patients with refractory ET will undergo a multi-domain neuropsychological battery assessment. This will include a pre−/post-implantation assessment (3 months after the stimulation of each target and 6 months after an open stage of DBS on the most optimal target).ConclusionEvidence on the neuropsychological effects of DBS in patients with refractory ET is very scarce, particularly in lesser-explored targets such as PSA. This study could contribute significantly in this field, particularly on pre-procedure safety analysis for tailored patient/technique selection, and to complete the safety analysis of the procedure. Moreover, if proven useful, this proposed neuropsychological assessment protocol could be extensible to other surgical therapies for ET.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:38:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-457501756ddc4f77993fca42860e704a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:38:51Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-457501756ddc4f77993fca42860e704a2023-10-30T15:46:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952023-10-011410.3389/fneur.2023.12225921222592Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremorLucía Triguero-Cueva0Lucía Triguero-Cueva1Bartolomé Marín-Romero2Carlos Javier Madrid-Navarro3Carlos Javier Madrid-Navarro4María José Pérez-Navarro5Benjamin Iáñez-Velasco6Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos7Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos8Majed Jouma Katati9Francisco Escamilla-Sevilla10Francisco Escamilla-Sevilla11Department of Neurology Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, SpainInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Granada, SpainDepartment of Neuropsychology Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, SpainDepartment of Neurology Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, SpainInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Granada, SpainDepartment of Neurology Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, SpainDepartment of Neurosurgery Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, SpainDepartment of Neurology Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, SpainInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Granada, SpainDepartment of Neurosurgery Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, SpainDepartment of Neurology Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, SpainInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Granada, SpainObjectivePatients with essential tremor (ET) may experience cognitive-affective impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), has been shown to be beneficial for refractory ET. However, there is little evidence regarding the possible neuropsychological effects of PSA-DBS on patients with ET, and there are few studies comparing it with VIM-DBS in this population.In this study, we aim to present the evaluation protocol and neuropsychological battery as used in an ongoing trial of DBS for ET comparing the already mentioned targets.MethodsAs part of a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of PSA-DBS vs. VIM-DBS, 11 patients with refractory ET will undergo a multi-domain neuropsychological battery assessment. This will include a pre−/post-implantation assessment (3 months after the stimulation of each target and 6 months after an open stage of DBS on the most optimal target).ConclusionEvidence on the neuropsychological effects of DBS in patients with refractory ET is very scarce, particularly in lesser-explored targets such as PSA. This study could contribute significantly in this field, particularly on pre-procedure safety analysis for tailored patient/technique selection, and to complete the safety analysis of the procedure. Moreover, if proven useful, this proposed neuropsychological assessment protocol could be extensible to other surgical therapies for ET.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1222592/fullcognitive-affective impairmentdeep brain stimulationessential tremorneuropsychological assessmentposterior subthalamic areaventral intermediate nucleus
spellingShingle Lucía Triguero-Cueva
Lucía Triguero-Cueva
Bartolomé Marín-Romero
Carlos Javier Madrid-Navarro
Carlos Javier Madrid-Navarro
María José Pérez-Navarro
Benjamin Iáñez-Velasco
Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos
Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos
Majed Jouma Katati
Francisco Escamilla-Sevilla
Francisco Escamilla-Sevilla
Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
Frontiers in Neurology
cognitive-affective impairment
deep brain stimulation
essential tremor
neuropsychological assessment
posterior subthalamic area
ventral intermediate nucleus
title Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_full Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_fullStr Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_full_unstemmed Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_short Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_sort neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
topic cognitive-affective impairment
deep brain stimulation
essential tremor
neuropsychological assessment
posterior subthalamic area
ventral intermediate nucleus
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1222592/full
work_keys_str_mv AT luciatriguerocueva neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT luciatriguerocueva neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT bartolomemarinromero neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT carlosjaviermadridnavarro neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT carlosjaviermadridnavarro neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT mariajosepereznavarro neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT benjaminianezvelasco neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT adolfominguezcastellanos neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT adolfominguezcastellanos neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT majedjoumakatati neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT franciscoescamillasevilla neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT franciscoescamillasevilla neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor