Ground reaction forces during walking with different load and slope combinations in rats

Abstract Background Treadmill animal models are commonly used to study effects of exercise on bone. Since mechanical loading induces bone strain, resulting in bone formation, exercise that induces higher strains is likely to cause more bone formation. Our aim was to investigate the effect of slope a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Bravenboer, B. T. T. M. van Rens, H. W. van Essen, J. H. van Dieën, P. Lips
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-08-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40634-017-0102-8
_version_ 1797331473500471296
author N. Bravenboer
B. T. T. M. van Rens
H. W. van Essen
J. H. van Dieën
P. Lips
author_facet N. Bravenboer
B. T. T. M. van Rens
H. W. van Essen
J. H. van Dieën
P. Lips
author_sort N. Bravenboer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Treadmill animal models are commonly used to study effects of exercise on bone. Since mechanical loading induces bone strain, resulting in bone formation, exercise that induces higher strains is likely to cause more bone formation. Our aim was to investigate the effect of slope and additional load on limb bone strain. Methods Horizontal and vertical ground reaction forces on left fore-limb (FL) and hind-limb (HL) of twenty 23-week old female Wistar rats (weight 279 ± 26 g) were measured for six combinations of SLOPE (−10°, 0°, +10°) and LOAD (0 to 23% of body mass). Peak force (Fmax), rate of force rise (RC), stance time (Tstance) and impulse (Fint) on FLs and HLs were analyzed. Results For the FL, peak ground reaction forces and rate of force rise were highest when walking downward −10° with load (Fmax = 2.09±0.05 N, FLRC = 34±2 N/s) For the HL, ground reaction forces and rate of force rise were highest when walking upward +10°, without load (Fmax = 2.20±0.05 N, HLRC = 34±1 N/s). Load increased stance time. Without additional load, estimates for the highest FL loading (slope is −10°) were larger than for the highest HL loading (slope is +10°) relative to level walking. Conclusions Thus, walking downward has a higher impact on FL bones, while walking upward is a more optimal HL exercise. Additional load may have a small effect on FL loading.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T07:36:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45876c2835e24df3bc93b77c1a1fe98d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-1153
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T07:36:05Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-45876c2835e24df3bc93b77c1a1fe98d2024-02-02T19:01:33ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics2197-11532017-08-014111010.1186/s40634-017-0102-8Ground reaction forces during walking with different load and slope combinations in ratsN. Bravenboer0B. T. T. M. van Rens1H. W. van Essen2J. H. van Dieën3P. Lips4Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical CenterAmsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical CenterAmsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical CenterAmsterdam Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment Internal Medicine, VU University Medical CenterAbstract Background Treadmill animal models are commonly used to study effects of exercise on bone. Since mechanical loading induces bone strain, resulting in bone formation, exercise that induces higher strains is likely to cause more bone formation. Our aim was to investigate the effect of slope and additional load on limb bone strain. Methods Horizontal and vertical ground reaction forces on left fore-limb (FL) and hind-limb (HL) of twenty 23-week old female Wistar rats (weight 279 ± 26 g) were measured for six combinations of SLOPE (−10°, 0°, +10°) and LOAD (0 to 23% of body mass). Peak force (Fmax), rate of force rise (RC), stance time (Tstance) and impulse (Fint) on FLs and HLs were analyzed. Results For the FL, peak ground reaction forces and rate of force rise were highest when walking downward −10° with load (Fmax = 2.09±0.05 N, FLRC = 34±2 N/s) For the HL, ground reaction forces and rate of force rise were highest when walking upward +10°, without load (Fmax = 2.20±0.05 N, HLRC = 34±1 N/s). Load increased stance time. Without additional load, estimates for the highest FL loading (slope is −10°) were larger than for the highest HL loading (slope is +10°) relative to level walking. Conclusions Thus, walking downward has a higher impact on FL bones, while walking upward is a more optimal HL exercise. Additional load may have a small effect on FL loading.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40634-017-0102-8Animal modelExerciseLoadingOsteoporosisBone
spellingShingle N. Bravenboer
B. T. T. M. van Rens
H. W. van Essen
J. H. van Dieën
P. Lips
Ground reaction forces during walking with different load and slope combinations in rats
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Animal model
Exercise
Loading
Osteoporosis
Bone
title Ground reaction forces during walking with different load and slope combinations in rats
title_full Ground reaction forces during walking with different load and slope combinations in rats
title_fullStr Ground reaction forces during walking with different load and slope combinations in rats
title_full_unstemmed Ground reaction forces during walking with different load and slope combinations in rats
title_short Ground reaction forces during walking with different load and slope combinations in rats
title_sort ground reaction forces during walking with different load and slope combinations in rats
topic Animal model
Exercise
Loading
Osteoporosis
Bone
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40634-017-0102-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nbravenboer groundreactionforcesduringwalkingwithdifferentloadandslopecombinationsinrats
AT bttmvanrens groundreactionforcesduringwalkingwithdifferentloadandslopecombinationsinrats
AT hwvanessen groundreactionforcesduringwalkingwithdifferentloadandslopecombinationsinrats
AT jhvandieen groundreactionforcesduringwalkingwithdifferentloadandslopecombinationsinrats
AT plips groundreactionforcesduringwalkingwithdifferentloadandslopecombinationsinrats