»Lotteriefieber« und legislative Reaktionen: Die Reichsstadt Frankfurt in den 1770er und 1780er Jahren

The term »lottery fever« describes an extraordinary spread of lotteries in numerous German territories during the 1770s and 1780s. The most important types of lotteries were class lotteries and number lotteries (lotto), many of which were domiciled in Frankfurt’s neighbouring territories. Initially,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christian Kullick
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory 2020-01-01
Series:Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg28/rg28_151kullick.pdf
_version_ 1818428442102726656
author Christian Kullick
author_facet Christian Kullick
author_sort Christian Kullick
collection DOAJ
description The term »lottery fever« describes an extraordinary spread of lotteries in numerous German territories during the 1770s and 1780s. The most important types of lotteries were class lotteries and number lotteries (lotto), many of which were domiciled in Frankfurt’s neighbouring territories. Initially, the Frankfurt City Council saw no need to restrict the emerging lottery market, probably because the dangers of the volatile number lotteries that scored points with low stakes and astronomical profit expectations were underestimated. They mainly attracted poorer city dwellers. The city of Frankfurt even tried to set up a number lottery of its own. The first regulation of number lotteries in 1772 was meant to ensure regular concessions for charitable foundations from the lottery companies. However, concessions were only paid sporadically. In addition, number lotteries had proven to be lucrative for surrounding territories. Thus, cut- throat territorial battles developed using lotteries, with the city council loosing influence. The imperial city of Frankfurt thus became a pawn in the financial interests of the surrounding territories. An unsuccessful ban on betting in 1779 was therefore followed in 1780 by a complete ban on number lotteries, which also failed to achieve exclusion. The ban was circumvented by resourceful lottery collectors using extraterritorial areas within Frankfurt. Only through the intervention of external factors, which led to the end of number lotteries outside Frankfurt, could this chapter be closed for the city council.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T15:01:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-458eb3311ee442deb43afb32480376bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1619-4993
2195-9617
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-14T15:01:41Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
record_format Article
series Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
spelling doaj.art-458eb3311ee442deb43afb32480376bd2022-12-21T22:56:48ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172020-01-01Rg 2815116310.12946/rg28/151-1631340»Lotteriefieber« und legislative Reaktionen: Die Reichsstadt Frankfurt in den 1770er und 1780er JahrenChristian Kullick0GSK Stockmann Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB, MünchenThe term »lottery fever« describes an extraordinary spread of lotteries in numerous German territories during the 1770s and 1780s. The most important types of lotteries were class lotteries and number lotteries (lotto), many of which were domiciled in Frankfurt’s neighbouring territories. Initially, the Frankfurt City Council saw no need to restrict the emerging lottery market, probably because the dangers of the volatile number lotteries that scored points with low stakes and astronomical profit expectations were underestimated. They mainly attracted poorer city dwellers. The city of Frankfurt even tried to set up a number lottery of its own. The first regulation of number lotteries in 1772 was meant to ensure regular concessions for charitable foundations from the lottery companies. However, concessions were only paid sporadically. In addition, number lotteries had proven to be lucrative for surrounding territories. Thus, cut- throat territorial battles developed using lotteries, with the city council loosing influence. The imperial city of Frankfurt thus became a pawn in the financial interests of the surrounding territories. An unsuccessful ban on betting in 1779 was therefore followed in 1780 by a complete ban on number lotteries, which also failed to achieve exclusion. The ban was circumvented by resourceful lottery collectors using extraterritorial areas within Frankfurt. Only through the intervention of external factors, which led to the end of number lotteries outside Frankfurt, could this chapter be closed for the city council.http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg28/rg28_151kullick.pdflotterieslegislationpolicingearly modern agegambling
spellingShingle Christian Kullick
»Lotteriefieber« und legislative Reaktionen: Die Reichsstadt Frankfurt in den 1770er und 1780er Jahren
Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
lotteries
legislation
policing
early modern age
gambling
title »Lotteriefieber« und legislative Reaktionen: Die Reichsstadt Frankfurt in den 1770er und 1780er Jahren
title_full »Lotteriefieber« und legislative Reaktionen: Die Reichsstadt Frankfurt in den 1770er und 1780er Jahren
title_fullStr »Lotteriefieber« und legislative Reaktionen: Die Reichsstadt Frankfurt in den 1770er und 1780er Jahren
title_full_unstemmed »Lotteriefieber« und legislative Reaktionen: Die Reichsstadt Frankfurt in den 1770er und 1780er Jahren
title_short »Lotteriefieber« und legislative Reaktionen: Die Reichsstadt Frankfurt in den 1770er und 1780er Jahren
title_sort lotteriefieber und legislative reaktionen die reichsstadt frankfurt in den 1770er und 1780er jahren
topic lotteries
legislation
policing
early modern age
gambling
url http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg28/rg28_151kullick.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT christiankullick lotteriefieberundlegislativereaktionendiereichsstadtfrankfurtinden1770erund1780erjahren