The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus
The aim of the research was to determine the impact of double-cut harvest system on yield, as well as on suitability of Miscanthus × giganteus biomass for ensiling and biogas production. Biomass was harvested at the end of June (harvest I) and at the beginning of October (harvest II, regrowth). A si...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Plant, Soil and Environment |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pse-201907-0006_the-comparison-of-single-and-double-cut-harvests-on-biomass-yield-quality-and-biogas-production-of-miscanthus.php |
_version_ | 1797898065910169600 |
---|---|
author | Marta Kupryś-Caruk Sławomir Podlaski |
author_facet | Marta Kupryś-Caruk Sławomir Podlaski |
author_sort | Marta Kupryś-Caruk |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The aim of the research was to determine the impact of double-cut harvest system on yield, as well as on suitability of Miscanthus × giganteus biomass for ensiling and biogas production. Biomass was harvested at the end of June (harvest I) and at the beginning of October (harvest II, regrowth). A single-cut regime at the end of October was also conducted. Biomass from harvests I and II was ensiled and subjected to anaerobic fermentation. The total dry matter (DM) yield from double-cut harvest system was similar to the DM yield from one-cut harvest, but two harvests per year had a positive effect on chemical composition of the biomass. C/N ratio and lignin content in the biomass from harvest I was lower compared to the single-cut biomass. Double harvest biomass was susceptible to ensiling, however, the biomass from harvest I characterized by low dry matter and water soluble sugars content resulted in poorer quality of the obtained silage (butyric acid was present). There were no significant differences between the methane yields obtained from ensiled biomass from harvests I and II. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:08:23Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4596628f88dc4a248a11e3437cef9153 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1214-1178 1805-9368 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:08:23Z |
publishDate | 2019-07-01 |
publisher | Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | Plant, Soil and Environment |
spelling | doaj.art-4596628f88dc4a248a11e3437cef91532023-02-23T03:46:46ZengCzech Academy of Agricultural SciencesPlant, Soil and Environment1214-11781805-93682019-07-0165736937610.17221/97/2019-PSEpse-201907-0006The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteusMarta Kupryś-Caruk0Sławomir Podlaski1Department of Fermentation Technology, prof. W. Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, PolandThe aim of the research was to determine the impact of double-cut harvest system on yield, as well as on suitability of Miscanthus × giganteus biomass for ensiling and biogas production. Biomass was harvested at the end of June (harvest I) and at the beginning of October (harvest II, regrowth). A single-cut regime at the end of October was also conducted. Biomass from harvests I and II was ensiled and subjected to anaerobic fermentation. The total dry matter (DM) yield from double-cut harvest system was similar to the DM yield from one-cut harvest, but two harvests per year had a positive effect on chemical composition of the biomass. C/N ratio and lignin content in the biomass from harvest I was lower compared to the single-cut biomass. Double harvest biomass was susceptible to ensiling, however, the biomass from harvest I characterized by low dry matter and water soluble sugars content resulted in poorer quality of the obtained silage (butyric acid was present). There were no significant differences between the methane yields obtained from ensiled biomass from harvests I and II.https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pse-201907-0006_the-comparison-of-single-and-double-cut-harvests-on-biomass-yield-quality-and-biogas-production-of-miscanthus.phplignocellulose biomasslignocellulosic materialenergy productionenergy cropweather condition |
spellingShingle | Marta Kupryś-Caruk Sławomir Podlaski The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus Plant, Soil and Environment lignocellulose biomass lignocellulosic material energy production energy crop weather condition |
title | The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus |
title_full | The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus |
title_fullStr | The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus |
title_full_unstemmed | The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus |
title_short | The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus |
title_sort | comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield quality and biogas production of miscanthus giganteus |
topic | lignocellulose biomass lignocellulosic material energy production energy crop weather condition |
url | https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pse-201907-0006_the-comparison-of-single-and-double-cut-harvests-on-biomass-yield-quality-and-biogas-production-of-miscanthus.php |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martakupryscaruk thecomparisonofsingleanddoublecutharvestsonbiomassyieldqualityandbiogasproductionofmiscanthusgiganteus AT sławomirpodlaski thecomparisonofsingleanddoublecutharvestsonbiomassyieldqualityandbiogasproductionofmiscanthusgiganteus AT martakupryscaruk comparisonofsingleanddoublecutharvestsonbiomassyieldqualityandbiogasproductionofmiscanthusgiganteus AT sławomirpodlaski comparisonofsingleanddoublecutharvestsonbiomassyieldqualityandbiogasproductionofmiscanthusgiganteus |