The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus

The aim of the research was to determine the impact of double-cut harvest system on yield, as well as on suitability of Miscanthus × giganteus biomass for ensiling and biogas production. Biomass was harvested at the end of June (harvest I) and at the beginning of October (harvest II, regrowth). A si...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Kupryś-Caruk, Sławomir Podlaski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2019-07-01
Series:Plant, Soil and Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pse-201907-0006_the-comparison-of-single-and-double-cut-harvests-on-biomass-yield-quality-and-biogas-production-of-miscanthus.php
_version_ 1797898065910169600
author Marta Kupryś-Caruk
Sławomir Podlaski
author_facet Marta Kupryś-Caruk
Sławomir Podlaski
author_sort Marta Kupryś-Caruk
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the research was to determine the impact of double-cut harvest system on yield, as well as on suitability of Miscanthus × giganteus biomass for ensiling and biogas production. Biomass was harvested at the end of June (harvest I) and at the beginning of October (harvest II, regrowth). A single-cut regime at the end of October was also conducted. Biomass from harvests I and II was ensiled and subjected to anaerobic fermentation. The total dry matter (DM) yield from double-cut harvest system was similar to the DM yield from one-cut harvest, but two harvests per year had a positive effect on chemical composition of the biomass. C/N ratio and lignin content in the biomass from harvest I was lower compared to the single-cut biomass. Double harvest biomass was susceptible to ensiling, however, the biomass from harvest I characterized by low dry matter and water soluble sugars content resulted in poorer quality of the obtained silage (butyric acid was present). There were no significant differences between the methane yields obtained from ensiled biomass from harvests I and II.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T08:08:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4596628f88dc4a248a11e3437cef9153
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1214-1178
1805-9368
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T08:08:23Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
record_format Article
series Plant, Soil and Environment
spelling doaj.art-4596628f88dc4a248a11e3437cef91532023-02-23T03:46:46ZengCzech Academy of Agricultural SciencesPlant, Soil and Environment1214-11781805-93682019-07-0165736937610.17221/97/2019-PSEpse-201907-0006The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteusMarta Kupryś-Caruk0Sławomir Podlaski1Department of Fermentation Technology, prof. W. Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, PolandThe aim of the research was to determine the impact of double-cut harvest system on yield, as well as on suitability of Miscanthus × giganteus biomass for ensiling and biogas production. Biomass was harvested at the end of June (harvest I) and at the beginning of October (harvest II, regrowth). A single-cut regime at the end of October was also conducted. Biomass from harvests I and II was ensiled and subjected to anaerobic fermentation. The total dry matter (DM) yield from double-cut harvest system was similar to the DM yield from one-cut harvest, but two harvests per year had a positive effect on chemical composition of the biomass. C/N ratio and lignin content in the biomass from harvest I was lower compared to the single-cut biomass. Double harvest biomass was susceptible to ensiling, however, the biomass from harvest I characterized by low dry matter and water soluble sugars content resulted in poorer quality of the obtained silage (butyric acid was present). There were no significant differences between the methane yields obtained from ensiled biomass from harvests I and II.https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pse-201907-0006_the-comparison-of-single-and-double-cut-harvests-on-biomass-yield-quality-and-biogas-production-of-miscanthus.phplignocellulose biomasslignocellulosic materialenergy productionenergy cropweather condition
spellingShingle Marta Kupryś-Caruk
Sławomir Podlaski
The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus
Plant, Soil and Environment
lignocellulose biomass
lignocellulosic material
energy production
energy crop
weather condition
title The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus
title_full The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus
title_fullStr The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus
title_short The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus
title_sort comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield quality and biogas production of miscanthus giganteus
topic lignocellulose biomass
lignocellulosic material
energy production
energy crop
weather condition
url https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pse-201907-0006_the-comparison-of-single-and-double-cut-harvests-on-biomass-yield-quality-and-biogas-production-of-miscanthus.php
work_keys_str_mv AT martakupryscaruk thecomparisonofsingleanddoublecutharvestsonbiomassyieldqualityandbiogasproductionofmiscanthusgiganteus
AT sławomirpodlaski thecomparisonofsingleanddoublecutharvestsonbiomassyieldqualityandbiogasproductionofmiscanthusgiganteus
AT martakupryscaruk comparisonofsingleanddoublecutharvestsonbiomassyieldqualityandbiogasproductionofmiscanthusgiganteus
AT sławomirpodlaski comparisonofsingleanddoublecutharvestsonbiomassyieldqualityandbiogasproductionofmiscanthusgiganteus