Evaluation of commercial DNA and RNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing of FFPE samples.

Nucleic acid material of adequate quality is crucial for successful high-throughput sequencing (HTS) analysis. DNA and RNA isolated from archival FFPE material are frequently degraded and not readily amplifiable due to chemical damage introduced during fixation. To identify optimal nucleic acid extr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stine H Kresse, Heidi M Namløs, Susanne Lorenz, Jeanne-Marie Berner, Ola Myklebost, Bodil Bjerkehagen, Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5957415?pdf=render
_version_ 1828835463366967296
author Stine H Kresse
Heidi M Namløs
Susanne Lorenz
Jeanne-Marie Berner
Ola Myklebost
Bodil Bjerkehagen
Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda
author_facet Stine H Kresse
Heidi M Namløs
Susanne Lorenz
Jeanne-Marie Berner
Ola Myklebost
Bodil Bjerkehagen
Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda
author_sort Stine H Kresse
collection DOAJ
description Nucleic acid material of adequate quality is crucial for successful high-throughput sequencing (HTS) analysis. DNA and RNA isolated from archival FFPE material are frequently degraded and not readily amplifiable due to chemical damage introduced during fixation. To identify optimal nucleic acid extraction kits, DNA and RNA quantity, quality and performance in HTS applications were evaluated. DNA and RNA were isolated from five sarcoma archival FFPE blocks, using eight extraction protocols from seven kits from three different commercial vendors. For DNA extraction, the truXTRAC FFPE DNA kit from Covaris gave higher yields and better amplifiable DNA, but all protocols gave comparable HTS library yields using Agilent SureSelect XT and performed well in downstream variant calling. For RNA extraction, all protocols gave comparable yields and amplifiable RNA. However, for fusion gene detection using the Archer FusionPlex Sarcoma Assay, the truXTRAC FFPE RNA kit from Covaris and Agencourt FormaPure kit from Beckman Coulter showed the highest percentage of unique read-pairs, providing higher complexity of HTS data and more frequent detection of recurrent fusion genes. truXTRAC simultaneous DNA and RNA extraction gave similar outputs as individual protocols. These findings show that although successful HTS libraries could be generated in most cases, the different protocols gave variable quantity and quality for FFPE nucleic acid extraction. Selecting the optimal procedure is highly valuable and may generate results in borderline quality specimens.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T18:02:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45a46cefac9f430f8bf8fac5dbaa1302
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T18:02:22Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-45a46cefac9f430f8bf8fac5dbaa13022022-12-22T00:16:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01135e019745610.1371/journal.pone.0197456Evaluation of commercial DNA and RNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing of FFPE samples.Stine H KresseHeidi M NamløsSusanne LorenzJeanne-Marie BernerOla MyklebostBodil BjerkehagenLeonardo A Meza-ZepedaNucleic acid material of adequate quality is crucial for successful high-throughput sequencing (HTS) analysis. DNA and RNA isolated from archival FFPE material are frequently degraded and not readily amplifiable due to chemical damage introduced during fixation. To identify optimal nucleic acid extraction kits, DNA and RNA quantity, quality and performance in HTS applications were evaluated. DNA and RNA were isolated from five sarcoma archival FFPE blocks, using eight extraction protocols from seven kits from three different commercial vendors. For DNA extraction, the truXTRAC FFPE DNA kit from Covaris gave higher yields and better amplifiable DNA, but all protocols gave comparable HTS library yields using Agilent SureSelect XT and performed well in downstream variant calling. For RNA extraction, all protocols gave comparable yields and amplifiable RNA. However, for fusion gene detection using the Archer FusionPlex Sarcoma Assay, the truXTRAC FFPE RNA kit from Covaris and Agencourt FormaPure kit from Beckman Coulter showed the highest percentage of unique read-pairs, providing higher complexity of HTS data and more frequent detection of recurrent fusion genes. truXTRAC simultaneous DNA and RNA extraction gave similar outputs as individual protocols. These findings show that although successful HTS libraries could be generated in most cases, the different protocols gave variable quantity and quality for FFPE nucleic acid extraction. Selecting the optimal procedure is highly valuable and may generate results in borderline quality specimens.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5957415?pdf=render
spellingShingle Stine H Kresse
Heidi M Namløs
Susanne Lorenz
Jeanne-Marie Berner
Ola Myklebost
Bodil Bjerkehagen
Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda
Evaluation of commercial DNA and RNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing of FFPE samples.
PLoS ONE
title Evaluation of commercial DNA and RNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing of FFPE samples.
title_full Evaluation of commercial DNA and RNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing of FFPE samples.
title_fullStr Evaluation of commercial DNA and RNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing of FFPE samples.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of commercial DNA and RNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing of FFPE samples.
title_short Evaluation of commercial DNA and RNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing of FFPE samples.
title_sort evaluation of commercial dna and rna extraction methods for high throughput sequencing of ffpe samples
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5957415?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT stinehkresse evaluationofcommercialdnaandrnaextractionmethodsforhighthroughputsequencingofffpesamples
AT heidimnamløs evaluationofcommercialdnaandrnaextractionmethodsforhighthroughputsequencingofffpesamples
AT susannelorenz evaluationofcommercialdnaandrnaextractionmethodsforhighthroughputsequencingofffpesamples
AT jeannemarieberner evaluationofcommercialdnaandrnaextractionmethodsforhighthroughputsequencingofffpesamples
AT olamyklebost evaluationofcommercialdnaandrnaextractionmethodsforhighthroughputsequencingofffpesamples
AT bodilbjerkehagen evaluationofcommercialdnaandrnaextractionmethodsforhighthroughputsequencingofffpesamples
AT leonardoamezazepeda evaluationofcommercialdnaandrnaextractionmethodsforhighthroughputsequencingofffpesamples