Navigating the impact: a study of editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of AI tools in editing and proofreading

Abstract Human editors and proofreaders now face a new, and possibly serious, challenge: the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools that some consider to be as efficient and precise as experts in editing/proofreading. This research aims to investigate editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Islam Al Sawi, Ahmed Alaa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024-03-01
Series:Discover Artificial Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00116-5
_version_ 1827310060591644672
author Islam Al Sawi
Ahmed Alaa
author_facet Islam Al Sawi
Ahmed Alaa
author_sort Islam Al Sawi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Human editors and proofreaders now face a new, and possibly serious, challenge: the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools that some consider to be as efficient and precise as experts in editing/proofreading. This research aims to investigate editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of current AI tools. It examines whether editors/proofreaders view AI as an opportunity or a threat and considers their insights into the future of AI tools for them. The study collected qualitative data through email questionnaires from 17 professional editors and proofreaders purposively appointed from a society of professional editors and proofreaders in Egypt. The results revealed that the responses regarding AI for editors and proofreaders are generally mixed, with a range of both positive and negative perspectives. Some responses highlight the opportunities and benefits that AI tools can bring, such as increased efficiency, time-saving, and improved productivity. Others express concerns about potential threats, such as the possibility of AI replacing humans, ethical considerations, and the need for continued human involvement in the editing/proofreading process. Overall, the attitudes toward AI tools for editing and proofreading reflect a paradoxical view of the technology’s impact on the field. The active engagement and participation of editors and proofreaders are essential for the successful implementation of AI technologies in editorial contexts.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T19:53:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45c3bf189b094f0f871457295a0f1d87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2731-0809
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:53:41Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Discover Artificial Intelligence
spelling doaj.art-45c3bf189b094f0f871457295a0f1d872024-03-24T12:27:32ZengSpringerDiscover Artificial Intelligence2731-08092024-03-014111010.1007/s44163-024-00116-5Navigating the impact: a study of editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of AI tools in editing and proofreadingIslam Al Sawi0Ahmed Alaa1October University of Modern Sciences and ArtsFaculty of Languages and Translation, October 6 UniversityAbstract Human editors and proofreaders now face a new, and possibly serious, challenge: the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools that some consider to be as efficient and precise as experts in editing/proofreading. This research aims to investigate editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of current AI tools. It examines whether editors/proofreaders view AI as an opportunity or a threat and considers their insights into the future of AI tools for them. The study collected qualitative data through email questionnaires from 17 professional editors and proofreaders purposively appointed from a society of professional editors and proofreaders in Egypt. The results revealed that the responses regarding AI for editors and proofreaders are generally mixed, with a range of both positive and negative perspectives. Some responses highlight the opportunities and benefits that AI tools can bring, such as increased efficiency, time-saving, and improved productivity. Others express concerns about potential threats, such as the possibility of AI replacing humans, ethical considerations, and the need for continued human involvement in the editing/proofreading process. Overall, the attitudes toward AI tools for editing and proofreading reflect a paradoxical view of the technology’s impact on the field. The active engagement and participation of editors and proofreaders are essential for the successful implementation of AI technologies in editorial contexts.https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00116-5Artificial intelligenceEditorsProofreadersPerceptionsTechnologyChallenges
spellingShingle Islam Al Sawi
Ahmed Alaa
Navigating the impact: a study of editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of AI tools in editing and proofreading
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence
Editors
Proofreaders
Perceptions
Technology
Challenges
title Navigating the impact: a study of editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of AI tools in editing and proofreading
title_full Navigating the impact: a study of editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of AI tools in editing and proofreading
title_fullStr Navigating the impact: a study of editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of AI tools in editing and proofreading
title_full_unstemmed Navigating the impact: a study of editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of AI tools in editing and proofreading
title_short Navigating the impact: a study of editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of AI tools in editing and proofreading
title_sort navigating the impact a study of editors and proofreaders perceptions of ai tools in editing and proofreading
topic Artificial intelligence
Editors
Proofreaders
Perceptions
Technology
Challenges
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00116-5
work_keys_str_mv AT islamalsawi navigatingtheimpactastudyofeditorsandproofreadersperceptionsofaitoolsineditingandproofreading
AT ahmedalaa navigatingtheimpactastudyofeditorsandproofreadersperceptionsofaitoolsineditingandproofreading