Understanding the Mechanisms of Collective Decision Making in Ecological Restoration: An Agent-Based Model of Actors and Organizations

Ecological restoration, particularly in urban contexts, is a complex collective decision-making process that involves a diversity of stakeholders and experts, each with their own perceptions and preferences about what landscapes should and can look like, how to get them to the desired state, and on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristy Watkins, Dean Massey, Jeremy Brooks, Kristen Ross, Moira L. Zellner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2013-06-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss2/art32/
_version_ 1818839126654320640
author Cristy Watkins
Dean Massey
Jeremy Brooks
Kristen Ross
Moira L. Zellner
author_facet Cristy Watkins
Dean Massey
Jeremy Brooks
Kristen Ross
Moira L. Zellner
author_sort Cristy Watkins
collection DOAJ
description Ecological restoration, particularly in urban contexts, is a complex collective decision-making process that involves a diversity of stakeholders and experts, each with their own perceptions and preferences about what landscapes should and can look like, how to get them to the desired state, and on what timeline. We investigate how structural and behavioral factors may influence collective decision making in the context of ecological restoration, with the purpose of establishing general relationships between management styles (defined by structural and behavioral factors of the organization) and decision outcomes. Informed by existing literature on collective decision making and by empirical data from the Chicago Wilderness region, we present a stylized agent-based model that maps out and simulates the processes by which individuals within restoration organizations communicate, discuss, and ultimately make a decision. Our study examines how structural and behavioral characteristics - including: (a) the number of actors and groups involved in decision making, (b) the frequency and type of interactions among actors, (c) the initial setup of positions and respect, (d) outside information, and (e) entrenchment and cost of dissent - lead to or prohibit group convergence in terms of collective position, variation in position across actors, and final decision strategies. We found that formal meetings and group leaders are important facilitators of convergence, especially when multiple groups are present, new information is introduced in the process, and participants are polarized around an issue. Also, intergroup interactions are particularly important for overall convergence. Position entrenchment slows the convergence process and increases the need for decision strategies involving outside intervention. Cost of dissent can reinforce these effects. Our study formalizes collective decision-making processes within the context of ecological restoration, establishes generalizable relationships between these processes and decision outcomes, and provides a foundation for further empirical and modeling research.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T03:49:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45c877ebc53b47e99b56c6af567d6427
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1708-3087
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T03:49:20Z
publishDate 2013-06-01
publisher Resilience Alliance
record_format Article
series Ecology and Society
spelling doaj.art-45c877ebc53b47e99b56c6af567d64272022-12-21T20:37:03ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872013-06-011823210.5751/ES-05497-1802325497Understanding the Mechanisms of Collective Decision Making in Ecological Restoration: An Agent-Based Model of Actors and OrganizationsCristy Watkins0Dean Massey1Jeremy Brooks2Kristen Ross3Moira L. Zellner4The Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois, USAUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoEcological restoration, particularly in urban contexts, is a complex collective decision-making process that involves a diversity of stakeholders and experts, each with their own perceptions and preferences about what landscapes should and can look like, how to get them to the desired state, and on what timeline. We investigate how structural and behavioral factors may influence collective decision making in the context of ecological restoration, with the purpose of establishing general relationships between management styles (defined by structural and behavioral factors of the organization) and decision outcomes. Informed by existing literature on collective decision making and by empirical data from the Chicago Wilderness region, we present a stylized agent-based model that maps out and simulates the processes by which individuals within restoration organizations communicate, discuss, and ultimately make a decision. Our study examines how structural and behavioral characteristics - including: (a) the number of actors and groups involved in decision making, (b) the frequency and type of interactions among actors, (c) the initial setup of positions and respect, (d) outside information, and (e) entrenchment and cost of dissent - lead to or prohibit group convergence in terms of collective position, variation in position across actors, and final decision strategies. We found that formal meetings and group leaders are important facilitators of convergence, especially when multiple groups are present, new information is introduced in the process, and participants are polarized around an issue. Also, intergroup interactions are particularly important for overall convergence. Position entrenchment slows the convergence process and increases the need for decision strategies involving outside intervention. Cost of dissent can reinforce these effects. Our study formalizes collective decision-making processes within the context of ecological restoration, establishes generalizable relationships between these processes and decision outcomes, and provides a foundation for further empirical and modeling research.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss2/art32/agent-based modelingChicago Wildernesscollective decision makingecological restoration
spellingShingle Cristy Watkins
Dean Massey
Jeremy Brooks
Kristen Ross
Moira L. Zellner
Understanding the Mechanisms of Collective Decision Making in Ecological Restoration: An Agent-Based Model of Actors and Organizations
Ecology and Society
agent-based modeling
Chicago Wilderness
collective decision making
ecological restoration
title Understanding the Mechanisms of Collective Decision Making in Ecological Restoration: An Agent-Based Model of Actors and Organizations
title_full Understanding the Mechanisms of Collective Decision Making in Ecological Restoration: An Agent-Based Model of Actors and Organizations
title_fullStr Understanding the Mechanisms of Collective Decision Making in Ecological Restoration: An Agent-Based Model of Actors and Organizations
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the Mechanisms of Collective Decision Making in Ecological Restoration: An Agent-Based Model of Actors and Organizations
title_short Understanding the Mechanisms of Collective Decision Making in Ecological Restoration: An Agent-Based Model of Actors and Organizations
title_sort understanding the mechanisms of collective decision making in ecological restoration an agent based model of actors and organizations
topic agent-based modeling
Chicago Wilderness
collective decision making
ecological restoration
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss2/art32/
work_keys_str_mv AT cristywatkins understandingthemechanismsofcollectivedecisionmakinginecologicalrestorationanagentbasedmodelofactorsandorganizations
AT deanmassey understandingthemechanismsofcollectivedecisionmakinginecologicalrestorationanagentbasedmodelofactorsandorganizations
AT jeremybrooks understandingthemechanismsofcollectivedecisionmakinginecologicalrestorationanagentbasedmodelofactorsandorganizations
AT kristenross understandingthemechanismsofcollectivedecisionmakinginecologicalrestorationanagentbasedmodelofactorsandorganizations
AT moiralzellner understandingthemechanismsofcollectivedecisionmakinginecologicalrestorationanagentbasedmodelofactorsandorganizations