Intention to response, emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during COVID‐19

Abstract Aim To comprehensively assess the current level and identify associated factors of intention to response and emergency preparedness of clinical nurses during COVID‐19 outbreak. Design A cross‐sectional study was designed. Methods Demographic and characteristic questionnaire, intention to re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiaying Li, Pingdong Li, Jieya Chen, Liang Ruan, Qiuxuan Zeng, Yucui Gong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-11-01
Series:Nursing Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.576
_version_ 1818295139762700288
author Jiaying Li
Pingdong Li
Jieya Chen
Liang Ruan
Qiuxuan Zeng
Yucui Gong
author_facet Jiaying Li
Pingdong Li
Jieya Chen
Liang Ruan
Qiuxuan Zeng
Yucui Gong
author_sort Jiaying Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim To comprehensively assess the current level and identify associated factors of intention to response and emergency preparedness of clinical nurses during COVID‐19 outbreak. Design A cross‐sectional study was designed. Methods Demographic and characteristic questionnaire, intention to response scale, emergency preparedness scale and a self‐designed questionnaire related to effects of events and intention to leave were used in this study. Results The mean scores of intention to response and emergency preparedness were 82.00 (SD = 18.17) and 64.99 (SD = 12.94), respectively. Moral consideration, engaged in COVID‐19 protection training, had working experience in SARS, and the other eight factors were explained 34.6% of the total model variance in intention to response model (F = 80.05, p < .001). While, the level of IR, whether the pace of work was affected and above three same factors were explained 21.5% of the total model variance (F = 91.05, p < .001). Pathway analysis revealed that moral consideration, intention to leave and impacts on work and life mediate the relationship between EP and IR.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T03:42:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45c8d449f5c141209276b332e8c3c350
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-1058
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T03:42:54Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Nursing Open
spelling doaj.art-45c8d449f5c141209276b332e8c3c3502022-12-22T00:00:54ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582020-11-01761867187510.1002/nop2.576Intention to response, emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during COVID‐19Jiaying Li0Pingdong Li1Jieya Chen2Liang Ruan3Qiuxuan Zeng4Yucui Gong5Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou ChinaNursing Department The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou ChinaGuangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou ChinaGuangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou ChinaGuangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou ChinaNursing Department The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou ChinaAbstract Aim To comprehensively assess the current level and identify associated factors of intention to response and emergency preparedness of clinical nurses during COVID‐19 outbreak. Design A cross‐sectional study was designed. Methods Demographic and characteristic questionnaire, intention to response scale, emergency preparedness scale and a self‐designed questionnaire related to effects of events and intention to leave were used in this study. Results The mean scores of intention to response and emergency preparedness were 82.00 (SD = 18.17) and 64.99 (SD = 12.94), respectively. Moral consideration, engaged in COVID‐19 protection training, had working experience in SARS, and the other eight factors were explained 34.6% of the total model variance in intention to response model (F = 80.05, p < .001). While, the level of IR, whether the pace of work was affected and above three same factors were explained 21.5% of the total model variance (F = 91.05, p < .001). Pathway analysis revealed that moral consideration, intention to leave and impacts on work and life mediate the relationship between EP and IR.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.576COVID‐19emergency preparednessintention to responsenurses
spellingShingle Jiaying Li
Pingdong Li
Jieya Chen
Liang Ruan
Qiuxuan Zeng
Yucui Gong
Intention to response, emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during COVID‐19
Nursing Open
COVID‐19
emergency preparedness
intention to response
nurses
title Intention to response, emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during COVID‐19
title_full Intention to response, emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during COVID‐19
title_fullStr Intention to response, emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during COVID‐19
title_full_unstemmed Intention to response, emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during COVID‐19
title_short Intention to response, emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during COVID‐19
title_sort intention to response emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during covid 19
topic COVID‐19
emergency preparedness
intention to response
nurses
url https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.576
work_keys_str_mv AT jiayingli intentiontoresponseemergencypreparednessandintentiontoleaveamongnursesduringcovid19
AT pingdongli intentiontoresponseemergencypreparednessandintentiontoleaveamongnursesduringcovid19
AT jieyachen intentiontoresponseemergencypreparednessandintentiontoleaveamongnursesduringcovid19
AT liangruan intentiontoresponseemergencypreparednessandintentiontoleaveamongnursesduringcovid19
AT qiuxuanzeng intentiontoresponseemergencypreparednessandintentiontoleaveamongnursesduringcovid19
AT yucuigong intentiontoresponseemergencypreparednessandintentiontoleaveamongnursesduringcovid19