LATIS: Constraints on the Galaxy–Halo Connection at z ∼ 2.5 from Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Lyα Clustering

The connection between galaxies and dark matter halos is often quantified using the stellar mass–halo mass (SMHM) relation. Optical and near-infrared imaging surveys have led to a broadly consistent picture of the evolving SMHM relation based on measurements of galaxy abundances and angular correlat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew B. Newman, Mahdi Qezlou, Nima Chartab, Gwen C. Rudie, Guillermo A. Blanc, Simeon Bird, Andrew J. Benson, Daniel D. Kelson, Brian C. Lemaux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2024-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0896
_version_ 1797357486663008256
author Andrew B. Newman
Mahdi Qezlou
Nima Chartab
Gwen C. Rudie
Guillermo A. Blanc
Simeon Bird
Andrew J. Benson
Daniel D. Kelson
Brian C. Lemaux
author_facet Andrew B. Newman
Mahdi Qezlou
Nima Chartab
Gwen C. Rudie
Guillermo A. Blanc
Simeon Bird
Andrew J. Benson
Daniel D. Kelson
Brian C. Lemaux
author_sort Andrew B. Newman
collection DOAJ
description The connection between galaxies and dark matter halos is often quantified using the stellar mass–halo mass (SMHM) relation. Optical and near-infrared imaging surveys have led to a broadly consistent picture of the evolving SMHM relation based on measurements of galaxy abundances and angular correlation functions. Spectroscopic surveys at z ≳ 2 can also constrain the SMHM relation via the galaxy autocorrelation function and through the cross-correlation between galaxies and Ly α absorption measured in transverse sight lines; however, such studies are very few and have produced some unexpected or inconclusive results. We use ∼3000 spectra of z ∼ 2.5 galaxies from the Ly α Tomography IMACS Survey (LATIS) to measure the galaxy–galaxy and galaxy–Ly α correlation functions in four bins of stellar mass spanning 10 ^9.2 ≲ M _* / M _⊙ ≲ 10 ^10.5 . Parallel analyses of the MultiDark N -body and ASTRID hydrodynamic cosmological simulations allow us to model the correlation functions, estimate covariance matrices, and infer halo masses. We find that results of the two methods are mutually consistent and broadly accord with standard SMHM relations. This consistency demonstrates that we are able to measure and model Ly α transmission fluctuations δ _F in LATIS accurately. We also show that the galaxy–Ly α cross-correlation, a free by-product of optical spectroscopic galaxy surveys at these redshifts, can constrain halo masses with similar precision to galaxy–galaxy clustering.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:45:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45d0161b2f3545548295d8d5ceca4527
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1538-4357
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T14:45:51Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj.art-45d0161b2f3545548295d8d5ceca45272024-01-11T09:50:56ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572024-01-0196112710.3847/1538-4357/ad0896LATIS: Constraints on the Galaxy–Halo Connection at z ∼ 2.5 from Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Lyα ClusteringAndrew B. Newman0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7769-8660Mahdi Qezlou1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-1240Nima Chartab2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-937XGwen C. Rudie3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-5413Guillermo A. Blanc4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-3944Simeon Bird5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-5490Andrew J. Benson6https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5501-6008Daniel D. Kelson7https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-4327Brian C. Lemaux8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1428-7036Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science , 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA ; anewman@carnegiescience.eduObservatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science , 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA ; anewman@carnegiescience.edu; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Riverside , 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521, USAObservatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science , 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA ; anewman@carnegiescience.eduObservatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science , 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA ; anewman@carnegiescience.eduObservatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science , 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA ; anewman@carnegiescience.edu; Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile , Camino del Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, ChileDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Riverside , 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521, USAObservatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science , 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA ; anewman@carnegiescience.eduObservatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science , 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA ; anewman@carnegiescience.eduGemini Observatory, NSF’s NOIRLab , 670 N. A’ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California , Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USAThe connection between galaxies and dark matter halos is often quantified using the stellar mass–halo mass (SMHM) relation. Optical and near-infrared imaging surveys have led to a broadly consistent picture of the evolving SMHM relation based on measurements of galaxy abundances and angular correlation functions. Spectroscopic surveys at z ≳ 2 can also constrain the SMHM relation via the galaxy autocorrelation function and through the cross-correlation between galaxies and Ly α absorption measured in transverse sight lines; however, such studies are very few and have produced some unexpected or inconclusive results. We use ∼3000 spectra of z ∼ 2.5 galaxies from the Ly α Tomography IMACS Survey (LATIS) to measure the galaxy–galaxy and galaxy–Ly α correlation functions in four bins of stellar mass spanning 10 ^9.2 ≲ M _* / M _⊙ ≲ 10 ^10.5 . Parallel analyses of the MultiDark N -body and ASTRID hydrodynamic cosmological simulations allow us to model the correlation functions, estimate covariance matrices, and infer halo masses. We find that results of the two methods are mutually consistent and broadly accord with standard SMHM relations. This consistency demonstrates that we are able to measure and model Ly α transmission fluctuations δ _F in LATIS accurately. We also show that the galaxy–Ly α cross-correlation, a free by-product of optical spectroscopic galaxy surveys at these redshifts, can constrain halo masses with similar precision to galaxy–galaxy clustering.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0896Galaxy dark matter halosLyα forestLyman-break galaxies
spellingShingle Andrew B. Newman
Mahdi Qezlou
Nima Chartab
Gwen C. Rudie
Guillermo A. Blanc
Simeon Bird
Andrew J. Benson
Daniel D. Kelson
Brian C. Lemaux
LATIS: Constraints on the Galaxy–Halo Connection at z ∼ 2.5 from Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Lyα Clustering
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxy dark matter halos
Lyα forest
Lyman-break galaxies
title LATIS: Constraints on the Galaxy–Halo Connection at z ∼ 2.5 from Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Lyα Clustering
title_full LATIS: Constraints on the Galaxy–Halo Connection at z ∼ 2.5 from Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Lyα Clustering
title_fullStr LATIS: Constraints on the Galaxy–Halo Connection at z ∼ 2.5 from Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Lyα Clustering
title_full_unstemmed LATIS: Constraints on the Galaxy–Halo Connection at z ∼ 2.5 from Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Lyα Clustering
title_short LATIS: Constraints on the Galaxy–Halo Connection at z ∼ 2.5 from Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Lyα Clustering
title_sort latis constraints on the galaxy halo connection at z ∼ 2 5 from galaxy galaxy and galaxy lyα clustering
topic Galaxy dark matter halos
Lyα forest
Lyman-break galaxies
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0896
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewbnewman latisconstraintsonthegalaxyhaloconnectionatz25fromgalaxygalaxyandgalaxylyaclustering
AT mahdiqezlou latisconstraintsonthegalaxyhaloconnectionatz25fromgalaxygalaxyandgalaxylyaclustering
AT nimachartab latisconstraintsonthegalaxyhaloconnectionatz25fromgalaxygalaxyandgalaxylyaclustering
AT gwencrudie latisconstraintsonthegalaxyhaloconnectionatz25fromgalaxygalaxyandgalaxylyaclustering
AT guillermoablanc latisconstraintsonthegalaxyhaloconnectionatz25fromgalaxygalaxyandgalaxylyaclustering
AT simeonbird latisconstraintsonthegalaxyhaloconnectionatz25fromgalaxygalaxyandgalaxylyaclustering
AT andrewjbenson latisconstraintsonthegalaxyhaloconnectionatz25fromgalaxygalaxyandgalaxylyaclustering
AT danieldkelson latisconstraintsonthegalaxyhaloconnectionatz25fromgalaxygalaxyandgalaxylyaclustering
AT brianclemaux latisconstraintsonthegalaxyhaloconnectionatz25fromgalaxygalaxyandgalaxylyaclustering