Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part I. Comparison Between One-Stage and Two-Stage Procedure
This study was undertaken to compare implant survival after one- or two-stage sinus augmentation. Ninety-two maxillary sinuses in 77 patients were augmented with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss®). These sinuses were subdivided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 49) was operated on with a one-stage pro...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Karolinum Press
2002-01-01
|
| Series: | Acta Medica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://actamedica.lfhk.cuni.cz/45/3/0115/ |
| _version_ | 1830476325544001536 |
|---|---|
| author | Samer Kasabah Antonín Šimůnek Jiří Krug Miguel Cevallos Lecaro |
| author_facet | Samer Kasabah Antonín Šimůnek Jiří Krug Miguel Cevallos Lecaro |
| author_sort | Samer Kasabah |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study was undertaken to compare implant survival after one- or two-stage sinus augmentation. Ninety-two maxillary sinuses in 77 patients were augmented with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss®). These sinuses were subdivided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 49) was operated on with a one-stage procedure, and Group 2 (n = 43) with a twostage operation. A hundred and eighty-five implants were inserted in these augmented sinuses. Clinical and radiographical evaluations were performed and recorded according to certain criteria. The follow-up period was ranging from 16 to 44 months. Out of the implants inserted using the one-stage procedure, all survived. Two implants failed in the two-stage procedure group (98.91 % implant survival). This study showed that no statistically significance was observed between the two surgical techniques (P<0.05). Therefore, the authors concluded the type of surgical procedure (one- or two-stage) has no effect on implant survival. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T15:52:45Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-45d3a230d0ec4d748600bdc9366220e5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1211-4286 1805-9694 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T15:52:45Z |
| publishDate | 2002-01-01 |
| publisher | Karolinum Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Medica |
| spelling | doaj.art-45d3a230d0ec4d748600bdc9366220e52022-12-21T18:58:11ZengKarolinum PressActa Medica1211-42861805-96942002-01-0145311511810.14712/18059694.2019.66Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part I. Comparison Between One-Stage and Two-Stage ProcedureSamer Kasabah0Antonín Šimůnek1Jiří Krug2Miguel Cevallos Lecaro3Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Department of Dentistry, Centre of Dental Implantology, Hradec Králové, Czech RepublicCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Department of Dentistry, Centre of Dental Implantology, Hradec Králové, Czech RepublicCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Department of Dentistry, Centre of Dental Implantology, Hradec Králové, Czech RepublicCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Department of Dentistry, Centre of Dental Implantology, Hradec Králové, Czech RepublicThis study was undertaken to compare implant survival after one- or two-stage sinus augmentation. Ninety-two maxillary sinuses in 77 patients were augmented with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss®). These sinuses were subdivided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 49) was operated on with a one-stage procedure, and Group 2 (n = 43) with a twostage operation. A hundred and eighty-five implants were inserted in these augmented sinuses. Clinical and radiographical evaluations were performed and recorded according to certain criteria. The follow-up period was ranging from 16 to 44 months. Out of the implants inserted using the one-stage procedure, all survived. Two implants failed in the two-stage procedure group (98.91 % implant survival). This study showed that no statistically significance was observed between the two surgical techniques (P<0.05). Therefore, the authors concluded the type of surgical procedure (one- or two-stage) has no effect on implant survival.https://actamedica.lfhk.cuni.cz/45/3/0115/Endosteal implantSinus liftOne-stage procedureTwo-stage procedure |
| spellingShingle | Samer Kasabah Antonín Šimůnek Jiří Krug Miguel Cevallos Lecaro Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part I. Comparison Between One-Stage and Two-Stage Procedure Acta Medica Endosteal implant Sinus lift One-stage procedure Two-stage procedure |
| title | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part I. Comparison Between One-Stage and Two-Stage Procedure |
| title_full | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part I. Comparison Between One-Stage and Two-Stage Procedure |
| title_fullStr | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part I. Comparison Between One-Stage and Two-Stage Procedure |
| title_full_unstemmed | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part I. Comparison Between One-Stage and Two-Stage Procedure |
| title_short | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part I. Comparison Between One-Stage and Two-Stage Procedure |
| title_sort | maxillary sinus augmentation using deproteinized bovine bone bio oss r and impladent r dental implant system part i comparison between one stage and two stage procedure |
| topic | Endosteal implant Sinus lift One-stage procedure Two-stage procedure |
| url | https://actamedica.lfhk.cuni.cz/45/3/0115/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT samerkasabah maxillarysinusaugmentationusingdeproteinizedbovinebonebioossandimpladentdentalimplantsystemparticomparisonbetweenonestageandtwostageprocedure AT antoninsimunek maxillarysinusaugmentationusingdeproteinizedbovinebonebioossandimpladentdentalimplantsystemparticomparisonbetweenonestageandtwostageprocedure AT jirikrug maxillarysinusaugmentationusingdeproteinizedbovinebonebioossandimpladentdentalimplantsystemparticomparisonbetweenonestageandtwostageprocedure AT miguelcevalloslecaro maxillarysinusaugmentationusingdeproteinizedbovinebonebioossandimpladentdentalimplantsystemparticomparisonbetweenonestageandtwostageprocedure |