A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault

Michel Foucault's thought not only converges with a certain type of pragmatism; it can deepen our understanding of pragmatism. There is an ambivalence in pragmatist thought between an approach that privileges the question of: ”What works?” and ”How does it work?” The former misses the politic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Todd May
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CBS Open Journals 2011-02-01
Series:Foucault Studies
Online Access:https://192.168.7.24:443/index.php/foucault-studies/article/view/3205
_version_ 1797287828977090560
author Todd May
author_facet Todd May
author_sort Todd May
collection DOAJ
description Michel Foucault's thought not only converges with a certain type of pragmatism; it can deepen our understanding of pragmatism. There is an ambivalence in pragmatist thought between an approach that privileges the question of: ”What works?” and ”How does it work?” The former misses the political idea that some practices don't just work, but work for one purpose or another. Foucault's pragmatism does not focus on what works, but instead utilizes the concept of practices as a unit of analysis, and then asks how they work. This reintroduces a political element that sometimes goes missing in pragmatist thought.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T18:40:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45dc0afd75384ebb9b3f74750204ffe9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1832-5203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T18:40:15Z
publishDate 2011-02-01
publisher CBS Open Journals
record_format Article
series Foucault Studies
spelling doaj.art-45dc0afd75384ebb9b3f74750204ffe92024-03-02T03:58:37ZengCBS Open JournalsFoucault Studies1832-52032011-02-011110.22439/fs.v0i11.3205A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to FoucaultTodd May0Clemson UniversityMichel Foucault's thought not only converges with a certain type of pragmatism; it can deepen our understanding of pragmatism. There is an ambivalence in pragmatist thought between an approach that privileges the question of: ”What works?” and ”How does it work?” The former misses the political idea that some practices don't just work, but work for one purpose or another. Foucault's pragmatism does not focus on what works, but instead utilizes the concept of practices as a unit of analysis, and then asks how they work. This reintroduces a political element that sometimes goes missing in pragmatist thought.https://192.168.7.24:443/index.php/foucault-studies/article/view/3205
spellingShingle Todd May
A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault
Foucault Studies
title A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault
title_full A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault
title_fullStr A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault
title_full_unstemmed A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault
title_short A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault
title_sort new neo pragmatism from james and dewey to foucault
url https://192.168.7.24:443/index.php/foucault-studies/article/view/3205
work_keys_str_mv AT toddmay anewneopragmatismfromjamesanddeweytofoucault
AT toddmay newneopragmatismfromjamesanddeweytofoucault