A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault
Michel Foucault's thought not only converges with a certain type of pragmatism; it can deepen our understanding of pragmatism. There is an ambivalence in pragmatist thought between an approach that privileges the question of: ”What works?” and ”How does it work?” The former misses the politic...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
CBS Open Journals
2011-02-01
|
Series: | Foucault Studies |
Online Access: | https://192.168.7.24:443/index.php/foucault-studies/article/view/3205 |
_version_ | 1797287828977090560 |
---|---|
author | Todd May |
author_facet | Todd May |
author_sort | Todd May |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Michel Foucault's thought not only converges with a certain type of pragmatism; it can deepen our understanding of pragmatism. There is an ambivalence in pragmatist thought between an approach that privileges the question of: ”What works?” and ”How does it work?” The former misses the political idea that some practices don't just work, but work for one purpose or another. Foucault's pragmatism does not focus on what works, but instead utilizes the concept of practices as a unit of analysis, and then asks how they work. This reintroduces a political element that sometimes goes missing in pragmatist thought. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T18:40:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-45dc0afd75384ebb9b3f74750204ffe9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1832-5203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T18:40:15Z |
publishDate | 2011-02-01 |
publisher | CBS Open Journals |
record_format | Article |
series | Foucault Studies |
spelling | doaj.art-45dc0afd75384ebb9b3f74750204ffe92024-03-02T03:58:37ZengCBS Open JournalsFoucault Studies1832-52032011-02-011110.22439/fs.v0i11.3205A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to FoucaultTodd May0Clemson UniversityMichel Foucault's thought not only converges with a certain type of pragmatism; it can deepen our understanding of pragmatism. There is an ambivalence in pragmatist thought between an approach that privileges the question of: ”What works?” and ”How does it work?” The former misses the political idea that some practices don't just work, but work for one purpose or another. Foucault's pragmatism does not focus on what works, but instead utilizes the concept of practices as a unit of analysis, and then asks how they work. This reintroduces a political element that sometimes goes missing in pragmatist thought.https://192.168.7.24:443/index.php/foucault-studies/article/view/3205 |
spellingShingle | Todd May A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault Foucault Studies |
title | A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault |
title_full | A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault |
title_fullStr | A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault |
title_short | A New Neo-Pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault |
title_sort | new neo pragmatism from james and dewey to foucault |
url | https://192.168.7.24:443/index.php/foucault-studies/article/view/3205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toddmay anewneopragmatismfromjamesanddeweytofoucault AT toddmay newneopragmatismfromjamesanddeweytofoucault |