SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is commonly used to treat patients with complex renal calculi. Placing a nephrostomy tube is the last step after completing PNL. Significant early postoperative discomfort after percutaneous procedure is usually secondary to nephrostomy tubes. The goal of this stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S Falahatkar, I Khosropanah, A Roshani, H Niroumand, S Nikpour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2008-10-01
Series:Acta Medica Iranica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3503
_version_ 1811267869701308416
author S Falahatkar
I Khosropanah
A Roshani
H Niroumand
S Nikpour
author_facet S Falahatkar
I Khosropanah
A Roshani
H Niroumand
S Nikpour
author_sort S Falahatkar
collection DOAJ
description Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is commonly used to treat patients with complex renal calculi. Placing a nephrostomy tube is the last step after completing PNL. Significant early postoperative discomfort after percutaneous procedure is usually secondary to nephrostomy tubes. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety of tubeless PNL. A total of 45 patients with mean age of 46.6 years entered the study. Tubeless PNL was performed in 28 patients and 17 patients were treated with standard PNL. The results of 2 groups were compared with t test. In both groups, PNL was performed successfully without any significant complication. Postoperative hospitalization in standard group was 3.71 day and in tubeless group was 1.65 day that significant statistical difference was observed (P < 0.05). Analgesic dose using in standard group was 101.56 mg (pethidine) vs 99.07 mg (pethidine) in tubeless group, with no significant statistical difference. There wasn't any organ trauma. Rate of complications, including hematuria, extravasation, fever, UTI and urosepsis, didn't have any significant statistical difference in two groups. It seems that tubeless PNL may be an effective and safe method in renal stone treatment in selected patients. In comparison with standard PNL, tubeless PNL has some benefits including reduction the length of hospitalization. Further studies on more patients are needed to determine the advantages of this technique.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:10:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45dc1f99e871450a862898675fac32b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0044-6025
1735-9694
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:10:21Z
publishDate 2008-10-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Acta Medica Iranica
spelling doaj.art-45dc1f99e871450a862898675fac32b62022-12-22T03:16:36ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesActa Medica Iranica0044-60251735-96942008-10-01465SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMYS Falahatkar0I Khosropanah1A Roshani2H Niroumand3S Nikpour4Urology Research Center, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IranUrology Research Center, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IranUrology Research Center, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IranUrology Research Center, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IranUrology Research Center, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, IranPercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is commonly used to treat patients with complex renal calculi. Placing a nephrostomy tube is the last step after completing PNL. Significant early postoperative discomfort after percutaneous procedure is usually secondary to nephrostomy tubes. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety of tubeless PNL. A total of 45 patients with mean age of 46.6 years entered the study. Tubeless PNL was performed in 28 patients and 17 patients were treated with standard PNL. The results of 2 groups were compared with t test. In both groups, PNL was performed successfully without any significant complication. Postoperative hospitalization in standard group was 3.71 day and in tubeless group was 1.65 day that significant statistical difference was observed (P < 0.05). Analgesic dose using in standard group was 101.56 mg (pethidine) vs 99.07 mg (pethidine) in tubeless group, with no significant statistical difference. There wasn't any organ trauma. Rate of complications, including hematuria, extravasation, fever, UTI and urosepsis, didn't have any significant statistical difference in two groups. It seems that tubeless PNL may be an effective and safe method in renal stone treatment in selected patients. In comparison with standard PNL, tubeless PNL has some benefits including reduction the length of hospitalization. Further studies on more patients are needed to determine the advantages of this technique.https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3503Percutaneous nephrolithotomyurinary lithiasisnephrostomy
spellingShingle S Falahatkar
I Khosropanah
A Roshani
H Niroumand
S Nikpour
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
Acta Medica Iranica
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
urinary lithiasis
nephrostomy
title SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
title_full SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
title_fullStr SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
title_full_unstemmed SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
title_short SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
title_sort safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
topic Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
urinary lithiasis
nephrostomy
url https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3503
work_keys_str_mv AT sfalahatkar safetyandefficacyoftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT ikhosropanah safetyandefficacyoftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT aroshani safetyandefficacyoftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT hniroumand safetyandefficacyoftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT snikpour safetyandefficacyoftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomy