Estimated CO2 Emissions and Analysis of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) as an Alternative Fuel

The purpose of this study was to develop a CO2 emission factor for refuse plastic fuel (RPF) combustion facilities, and calculate the CO2 emissions from these facilities. The CO2 reduction from using these facilities was analyzed by comparing CO2 emission to facilities using fossil fuels. The averag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sang-Kyun Kim, Kee-Won Jang, Ji-Hyung Hong, Yong-Won Jung, Hyung-Chun Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2013-03-01
Series:Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://asianjae.org/_common/do.php?a=full&b=11&bidx=1567&aidx=19767
_version_ 1797727990459662336
author Sang-Kyun Kim
Kee-Won Jang
Ji-Hyung Hong
Yong-Won Jung
Hyung-Chun Kim
author_facet Sang-Kyun Kim
Kee-Won Jang
Ji-Hyung Hong
Yong-Won Jung
Hyung-Chun Kim
author_sort Sang-Kyun Kim
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to develop a CO2 emission factor for refuse plastic fuel (RPF) combustion facilities, and calculate the CO2 emissions from these facilities. The CO2 reduction from using these facilities was analyzed by comparing CO2 emission to facilities using fossil fuels. The average CO2 emission factor from RPF combustion facilities was 59.7 Mg CO2/TJ. In addition, fossil fuel and RPF use were compared using net calorific value (NCV). Domestic RPF consumption in 2011 was 240,000 Mg/yr, which was compared to fossil fuels using NCV. B-C oil use, which has the same NCV, was equal to RPF use. In contrast, bituminous and anthracite were estimated at 369,231 Mg/yr and 355,556 Mg/yr, respectively. In addition, the reduction in CO2 emissions due to the alternative fuel was analyzed. CO2 emissions were reduced by more than 350 Mg CO2/yr compared to bituminous and anthracite. We confirmed that using RPF, an alternative fuel, can reduce CO2 emissions.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:08:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45e5c7d4c1854f2da3478dc14df3ae86
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-6912
2287-1160
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:08:25Z
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
spelling doaj.art-45e5c7d4c1854f2da3478dc14df3ae862023-09-02T03:27:47ZengSpringerAsian Journal of Atmospheric Environment1976-69122287-11602013-03-0171485510.5572/ajae.2013.7.1.048Estimated CO2 Emissions and Analysis of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) as an Alternative FuelSang-Kyun Kim0Kee-Won Jang1Ji-Hyung Hong 2Yong-Won Jung3Hyung-Chun Kim4Division of Air Pollution Engineering, Department of Climate and Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 404-708, KoreaDivision of Air Pollution Engineering, Department of Climate and Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 404-708, KoreaDivision of Air Pollution Engineering, Department of Climate and Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 404-708, KoreaDepartment of Civil/Environmental/Geoinformatic Engineering, In-Ha UniversityDivision of Air Pollution Engineering, Department of Climate and Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 404-708, KoreaThe purpose of this study was to develop a CO2 emission factor for refuse plastic fuel (RPF) combustion facilities, and calculate the CO2 emissions from these facilities. The CO2 reduction from using these facilities was analyzed by comparing CO2 emission to facilities using fossil fuels. The average CO2 emission factor from RPF combustion facilities was 59.7 Mg CO2/TJ. In addition, fossil fuel and RPF use were compared using net calorific value (NCV). Domestic RPF consumption in 2011 was 240,000 Mg/yr, which was compared to fossil fuels using NCV. B-C oil use, which has the same NCV, was equal to RPF use. In contrast, bituminous and anthracite were estimated at 369,231 Mg/yr and 355,556 Mg/yr, respectively. In addition, the reduction in CO2 emissions due to the alternative fuel was analyzed. CO2 emissions were reduced by more than 350 Mg CO2/yr compared to bituminous and anthracite. We confirmed that using RPF, an alternative fuel, can reduce CO2 emissions.http://asianjae.org/_common/do.php?a=full&b=11&bidx=1567&aidx=19767solid recovered fuel (srf)refuse plastic fuel (rpf)alternative fuelco2 emissionco2 reduction
spellingShingle Sang-Kyun Kim
Kee-Won Jang
Ji-Hyung Hong
Yong-Won Jung
Hyung-Chun Kim
Estimated CO2 Emissions and Analysis of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) as an Alternative Fuel
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
solid recovered fuel (srf)
refuse plastic fuel (rpf)
alternative fuel
co2 emission
co2 reduction
title Estimated CO2 Emissions and Analysis of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) as an Alternative Fuel
title_full Estimated CO2 Emissions and Analysis of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) as an Alternative Fuel
title_fullStr Estimated CO2 Emissions and Analysis of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) as an Alternative Fuel
title_full_unstemmed Estimated CO2 Emissions and Analysis of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) as an Alternative Fuel
title_short Estimated CO2 Emissions and Analysis of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) as an Alternative Fuel
title_sort estimated co2 emissions and analysis of solid recovered fuel srf as an alternative fuel
topic solid recovered fuel (srf)
refuse plastic fuel (rpf)
alternative fuel
co2 emission
co2 reduction
url http://asianjae.org/_common/do.php?a=full&b=11&bidx=1567&aidx=19767
work_keys_str_mv AT sangkyunkim estimatedco2emissionsandanalysisofsolidrecoveredfuelsrfasanalternativefuel
AT keewonjang estimatedco2emissionsandanalysisofsolidrecoveredfuelsrfasanalternativefuel
AT jihyunghong estimatedco2emissionsandanalysisofsolidrecoveredfuelsrfasanalternativefuel
AT yongwonjung estimatedco2emissionsandanalysisofsolidrecoveredfuelsrfasanalternativefuel
AT hyungchunkim estimatedco2emissionsandanalysisofsolidrecoveredfuelsrfasanalternativefuel