Technical Note: Interference errors in infrared remote sounding of the atmosphere
Classical error analysis in remote sounding distinguishes between four classes: "smoothing errors," "model parameter errors," "forward model errors," and "retrieval noise errors". For infrared sounding "interference err...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2007-07-01
|
| Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| Online Access: | http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/3537/2007/acp-7-3537-2007.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818380397204996096 |
|---|---|
| author | R. Sussmann T. Borsdorff |
| author_facet | R. Sussmann T. Borsdorff |
| author_sort | R. Sussmann |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Classical error analysis in remote sounding distinguishes between four classes: "smoothing errors," "model parameter errors," "forward model errors," and "retrieval noise errors". For infrared sounding "interference errors", which, in general, cannot be described by these four terms, can be significant. Interference errors originate from spectral residuals due to "interfering species" whose spectral features overlap with the signatures of the target species. A general method for quantification of interference errors is presented, which covers all possible algorithmic implementations, i.e., fine-grid retrievals of the interfering species or coarse-grid retrievals, and cases where the interfering species are not retrieved. In classical retrieval setups interference errors can exceed smoothing errors and can vary by orders of magnitude due to state dependency. An optimum strategy is suggested which practically eliminates interference errors by systematically minimizing the regularization strength applied to joint profile retrieval of the interfering species. This leads to an interfering-species selective deweighting of the retrieval. Details of microwindow selection are no longer critical for this optimum retrieval and widened microwindows even lead to reduced overall (smoothing and interference) errors. Since computational power will increase, more and more operational algorithms will be able to utilize this optimum strategy in the future. The findings of this paper can be applied to soundings of all infrared-active atmospheric species, which include more than two dozen different gases relevant to climate and ozone. This holds for all kinds of infrared remote sounding systems, i.e., retrievals from ground-based, balloon-borne, airborne, or satellite spectroradiometers. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T02:18:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-45e76cff502349958f90f4d17c51ad83 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1680-7316 1680-7324 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T02:18:02Z |
| publishDate | 2007-07-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| spelling | doaj.art-45e76cff502349958f90f4d17c51ad832022-12-21T23:20:34ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242007-07-0171335373557Technical Note: Interference errors in infrared remote sounding of the atmosphereR. SussmannT. BorsdorffClassical error analysis in remote sounding distinguishes between four classes: "smoothing errors," "model parameter errors," "forward model errors," and "retrieval noise errors". For infrared sounding "interference errors", which, in general, cannot be described by these four terms, can be significant. Interference errors originate from spectral residuals due to "interfering species" whose spectral features overlap with the signatures of the target species. A general method for quantification of interference errors is presented, which covers all possible algorithmic implementations, i.e., fine-grid retrievals of the interfering species or coarse-grid retrievals, and cases where the interfering species are not retrieved. In classical retrieval setups interference errors can exceed smoothing errors and can vary by orders of magnitude due to state dependency. An optimum strategy is suggested which practically eliminates interference errors by systematically minimizing the regularization strength applied to joint profile retrieval of the interfering species. This leads to an interfering-species selective deweighting of the retrieval. Details of microwindow selection are no longer critical for this optimum retrieval and widened microwindows even lead to reduced overall (smoothing and interference) errors. Since computational power will increase, more and more operational algorithms will be able to utilize this optimum strategy in the future. The findings of this paper can be applied to soundings of all infrared-active atmospheric species, which include more than two dozen different gases relevant to climate and ozone. This holds for all kinds of infrared remote sounding systems, i.e., retrievals from ground-based, balloon-borne, airborne, or satellite spectroradiometers.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/3537/2007/acp-7-3537-2007.pdf |
| spellingShingle | R. Sussmann T. Borsdorff Technical Note: Interference errors in infrared remote sounding of the atmosphere Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| title | Technical Note: Interference errors in infrared remote sounding of the atmosphere |
| title_full | Technical Note: Interference errors in infrared remote sounding of the atmosphere |
| title_fullStr | Technical Note: Interference errors in infrared remote sounding of the atmosphere |
| title_full_unstemmed | Technical Note: Interference errors in infrared remote sounding of the atmosphere |
| title_short | Technical Note: Interference errors in infrared remote sounding of the atmosphere |
| title_sort | technical note interference errors in infrared remote sounding of the atmosphere |
| url | http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/3537/2007/acp-7-3537-2007.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rsussmann technicalnoteinterferenceerrorsininfraredremotesoundingoftheatmosphere AT tborsdorff technicalnoteinterferenceerrorsininfraredremotesoundingoftheatmosphere |