Evaluation of a method to measure the ratio of pelvic limb to thoracic limb girth in dogs

Objective: To determine if a landmark-incorporated limb girth measurement in sound dogs, utilising the greater trochanter and the acromion process, would be both reliable and have a consistent ratio between pelvic limb (PL) and thoracic limb (TL) muscle measurements. Background: To establish a rel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisabeth A. Fox, Kirsty E. Oliver, Matthew W. Brunke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: RCVS Knowledge 2023-10-01
Series:Veterinary Evidence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/667
_version_ 1827383686096486400
author Elisabeth A. Fox
Kirsty E. Oliver
Matthew W. Brunke
author_facet Elisabeth A. Fox
Kirsty E. Oliver
Matthew W. Brunke
author_sort Elisabeth A. Fox
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To determine if a landmark-incorporated limb girth measurement in sound dogs, utilising the greater trochanter and the acromion process, would be both reliable and have a consistent ratio between pelvic limb (PL) and thoracic limb (TL) muscle measurements. Background: To establish a reliable and reproducible reference range for sound dogs. This reference range may help clinicians further evaluate dogs during lameness and musculoskeletal examinations. Evidentiary value: Prospective study of 115 sound dogs measured by a single observer. Methods:Examinations were performed by one observer, using a Gullick II tape measure for PL to TL ratio (PL:TL) measurements for 115 dogs. Bodyweight, breed, body condition score (BCS), and sex were recorded. Each limb was measured three times. The average PL:TL per dog was calculated. Further statistical analysis was used to calculate intra-observer variance and the correlation of limb girth to body weight, BCS, and sex, with significance set at P < 0.05. Results: The average PL:TL of the sample was 1.515 ± 0.049. Fifty-two dogs of the 115 cases (45%) had a PL:TL ratio of 1.500. PL:TL measurements were not related to dog weight, BCS, or sex. The intra-class correlation was reported to be 0.99. Conclusion: Our study suggests that a landmark-incorporated measurement in a weight-bearing position can be reproducible. Further investigation is required to determine if this measurement can be reproducible between multiple observers. Application: A landmark-incorporated limb girth measurement may guide clinicians in case progression and help pinpoint subclinical musculoskeletal disease in dogs.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:44:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45ff770c746f48719e44b5239f8f90a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2396-9776
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T14:44:50Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher RCVS Knowledge
record_format Article
series Veterinary Evidence
spelling doaj.art-45ff770c746f48719e44b5239f8f90a32024-01-11T11:58:07ZengRCVS KnowledgeVeterinary Evidence2396-97762023-10-018410.18849/ve.v8i4.667519Evaluation of a method to measure the ratio of pelvic limb to thoracic limb girth in dogsElisabeth A. Foxhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1401-1072Kirsty E. Oliverhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8611-4524Matthew W. Brunkehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5923-0001Objective: To determine if a landmark-incorporated limb girth measurement in sound dogs, utilising the greater trochanter and the acromion process, would be both reliable and have a consistent ratio between pelvic limb (PL) and thoracic limb (TL) muscle measurements. Background: To establish a reliable and reproducible reference range for sound dogs. This reference range may help clinicians further evaluate dogs during lameness and musculoskeletal examinations. Evidentiary value: Prospective study of 115 sound dogs measured by a single observer. Methods:Examinations were performed by one observer, using a Gullick II tape measure for PL to TL ratio (PL:TL) measurements for 115 dogs. Bodyweight, breed, body condition score (BCS), and sex were recorded. Each limb was measured three times. The average PL:TL per dog was calculated. Further statistical analysis was used to calculate intra-observer variance and the correlation of limb girth to body weight, BCS, and sex, with significance set at P < 0.05. Results: The average PL:TL of the sample was 1.515 ± 0.049. Fifty-two dogs of the 115 cases (45%) had a PL:TL ratio of 1.500. PL:TL measurements were not related to dog weight, BCS, or sex. The intra-class correlation was reported to be 0.99. Conclusion: Our study suggests that a landmark-incorporated measurement in a weight-bearing position can be reproducible. Further investigation is required to determine if this measurement can be reproducible between multiple observers. Application: A landmark-incorporated limb girth measurement may guide clinicians in case progression and help pinpoint subclinical musculoskeletal disease in dogs.https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/667limb girthlimb measurementsthoracicpelviclimb ratiogullickmuscle massdogs
spellingShingle Elisabeth A. Fox
Kirsty E. Oliver
Matthew W. Brunke
Evaluation of a method to measure the ratio of pelvic limb to thoracic limb girth in dogs
Veterinary Evidence
limb girth
limb measurements
thoracic
pelvic
limb ratio
gullick
muscle mass
dogs
title Evaluation of a method to measure the ratio of pelvic limb to thoracic limb girth in dogs
title_full Evaluation of a method to measure the ratio of pelvic limb to thoracic limb girth in dogs
title_fullStr Evaluation of a method to measure the ratio of pelvic limb to thoracic limb girth in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a method to measure the ratio of pelvic limb to thoracic limb girth in dogs
title_short Evaluation of a method to measure the ratio of pelvic limb to thoracic limb girth in dogs
title_sort evaluation of a method to measure the ratio of pelvic limb to thoracic limb girth in dogs
topic limb girth
limb measurements
thoracic
pelvic
limb ratio
gullick
muscle mass
dogs
url https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/667
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabethafox evaluationofamethodtomeasuretheratioofpelviclimbtothoraciclimbgirthindogs
AT kirstyeoliver evaluationofamethodtomeasuretheratioofpelviclimbtothoraciclimbgirthindogs
AT matthewwbrunke evaluationofamethodtomeasuretheratioofpelviclimbtothoraciclimbgirthindogs