Effects of Daily Light Integral on Compact Tomato Plants Grown for Indoor Gardening

Our objective was to characterize the growth, physiological responses, fruit yield, and quality of tomato (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i> L.) plants grown under different daily light integrals (DLIs) and photoperiods. In experiment I, nine compact tomato cultivars were grown indoors using b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie Cruz, Celina Gómez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/7/1704
_version_ 1797433936650960896
author Stephanie Cruz
Celina Gómez
author_facet Stephanie Cruz
Celina Gómez
author_sort Stephanie Cruz
collection DOAJ
description Our objective was to characterize the growth, physiological responses, fruit yield, and quality of tomato (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i> L.) plants grown under different daily light integrals (DLIs) and photoperiods. In experiment I, nine compact tomato cultivars were grown indoors using broadband white light-emitting diode (LED) fixtures. Plants were grown under low (10.4 mol·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>) and high (18.4 mol·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>) DLIs with 12 and 16 h photoperiods, respectively, and two intermediate DLIs of 13.8 mol·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> with either 12 or 16 h photoperiods. In experiment II, three compact tomato cultivars were grown under the same low DLI with either 8 or 12 h photoperiods, and the same high DLI with either 12 or 16 h photoperiods. Generally, higher DLIs decreased plant growth and increased the fruit yield. Changing the DLI delivery strategy by adjusting the photoperiod and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) did not have major effects on the growth, yield, and fruit quality of the compact tomato plants evaluated in this study, even though net photosynthesis increased under higher PPFDs in experiment II. Although several cultivars were affected by intumescence, only two cultivars showed treatment responses, for which the severity was generally higher in lower PPFDs using the same DLI.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:23:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46270caffce7465b91dbce59b304f2c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:23:59Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-46270caffce7465b91dbce59b304f2c82023-12-01T21:47:50ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952022-07-01127170410.3390/agronomy12071704Effects of Daily Light Integral on Compact Tomato Plants Grown for Indoor GardeningStephanie Cruz0Celina Gómez1Environmental Horticulture Department, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USAEnvironmental Horticulture Department, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USAOur objective was to characterize the growth, physiological responses, fruit yield, and quality of tomato (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i> L.) plants grown under different daily light integrals (DLIs) and photoperiods. In experiment I, nine compact tomato cultivars were grown indoors using broadband white light-emitting diode (LED) fixtures. Plants were grown under low (10.4 mol·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>) and high (18.4 mol·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>) DLIs with 12 and 16 h photoperiods, respectively, and two intermediate DLIs of 13.8 mol·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> with either 12 or 16 h photoperiods. In experiment II, three compact tomato cultivars were grown under the same low DLI with either 8 or 12 h photoperiods, and the same high DLI with either 12 or 16 h photoperiods. Generally, higher DLIs decreased plant growth and increased the fruit yield. Changing the DLI delivery strategy by adjusting the photoperiod and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) did not have major effects on the growth, yield, and fruit quality of the compact tomato plants evaluated in this study, even though net photosynthesis increased under higher PPFDs in experiment II. Although several cultivars were affected by intumescence, only two cultivars showed treatment responses, for which the severity was generally higher in lower PPFDs using the same DLI.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/7/1704controlled environmentsDLIindoor farmingLEDssole-source lightingurban agriculture
spellingShingle Stephanie Cruz
Celina Gómez
Effects of Daily Light Integral on Compact Tomato Plants Grown for Indoor Gardening
Agronomy
controlled environments
DLI
indoor farming
LEDs
sole-source lighting
urban agriculture
title Effects of Daily Light Integral on Compact Tomato Plants Grown for Indoor Gardening
title_full Effects of Daily Light Integral on Compact Tomato Plants Grown for Indoor Gardening
title_fullStr Effects of Daily Light Integral on Compact Tomato Plants Grown for Indoor Gardening
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Daily Light Integral on Compact Tomato Plants Grown for Indoor Gardening
title_short Effects of Daily Light Integral on Compact Tomato Plants Grown for Indoor Gardening
title_sort effects of daily light integral on compact tomato plants grown for indoor gardening
topic controlled environments
DLI
indoor farming
LEDs
sole-source lighting
urban agriculture
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/7/1704
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniecruz effectsofdailylightintegraloncompacttomatoplantsgrownforindoorgardening
AT celinagomez effectsofdailylightintegraloncompacttomatoplantsgrownforindoorgardening