Why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted? an overview of the contemporary jurisprudence

Orthodontics figures as one of the largest community of specialists in Brazil. Unfortunately, numbers are high not only for the professionals but also for the lawsuits against them. The aim of this study was to screen the Brazilian jurisprudence in order to identify the reasons that motivated patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernando Fortes Picoli, Ademir Franco, Mayara Barbosa Viandelli Mundim-Picoli, Luiz Renato Paranhos, Rhonan Ferreira Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia 2020-08-01
Series:Bioscience Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://seer-dev.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/51168
_version_ 1818441257120169984
author Fernando Fortes Picoli
Ademir Franco
Mayara Barbosa Viandelli Mundim-Picoli
Luiz Renato Paranhos
Rhonan Ferreira Silva
author_facet Fernando Fortes Picoli
Ademir Franco
Mayara Barbosa Viandelli Mundim-Picoli
Luiz Renato Paranhos
Rhonan Ferreira Silva
author_sort Fernando Fortes Picoli
collection DOAJ
description Orthodontics figures as one of the largest community of specialists in Brazil. Unfortunately, numbers are high not only for the professionals but also for the lawsuits against them. The aim of this study was to screen the Brazilian jurisprudence in order to identify the reasons that motivated patients against orthodontists and motivated Judges towards convictions in lawsuits. The sample consisted of 395 lawsuits retrieved from the State Civil Courts of Brazil (n=27). The lawsuits were founded on conflicts between orthodontists and patients. Case-specific legal information were registered, such as patients’ main reason behind the lawsuit and the decision in second instance. Chi-square and relative risk tests were calculated to investigate the influence of research variables towards conviction. Most of the lawsuits were judged in the State of São Paulo (n=151; 38.2%) and were published between 2011 and 2017 (rho: 0.797). The main reasons behind the lawsuits against orthodontists were the dissatisfaction with treatment outcomes (n=143, 36.2%), the occurrence of periodontal disease (n=45, 11.4%) and the need for tooth extractions (n=43, 10.9%). Statistically significant outcomes were detected between convictions in first and second instances and between convictions and the contractual obligation of result (p<0.001). The combination of I) patients’ dissatisfaction and II) judgments under the obligation of results in second instance figure as the main risk factors for the prosecution and conviction of orthodontists.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T18:25:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4629d68fc41a46c2b368e90b4498ed70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1981-3163
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T18:25:22Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
record_format Article
series Bioscience Journal
spelling doaj.art-4629d68fc41a46c2b368e90b4498ed702022-12-21T22:51:56ZengUniversidade Federal de UberlândiaBioscience Journal1981-31632020-08-01365Why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted? an overview of the contemporary jurisprudenceFernando Fortes Picoli0Ademir Franco1Mayara Barbosa Viandelli Mundim-Picoli2Luiz Renato Paranhos3Rhonan Ferreira Silva4Universidade Federal de Goiás Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenUniEvangélicaUniversidade Federal de UberlândiaUniversidade Federal de Goiás Orthodontics figures as one of the largest community of specialists in Brazil. Unfortunately, numbers are high not only for the professionals but also for the lawsuits against them. The aim of this study was to screen the Brazilian jurisprudence in order to identify the reasons that motivated patients against orthodontists and motivated Judges towards convictions in lawsuits. The sample consisted of 395 lawsuits retrieved from the State Civil Courts of Brazil (n=27). The lawsuits were founded on conflicts between orthodontists and patients. Case-specific legal information were registered, such as patients’ main reason behind the lawsuit and the decision in second instance. Chi-square and relative risk tests were calculated to investigate the influence of research variables towards conviction. Most of the lawsuits were judged in the State of São Paulo (n=151; 38.2%) and were published between 2011 and 2017 (rho: 0.797). The main reasons behind the lawsuits against orthodontists were the dissatisfaction with treatment outcomes (n=143, 36.2%), the occurrence of periodontal disease (n=45, 11.4%) and the need for tooth extractions (n=43, 10.9%). Statistically significant outcomes were detected between convictions in first and second instances and between convictions and the contractual obligation of result (p<0.001). The combination of I) patients’ dissatisfaction and II) judgments under the obligation of results in second instance figure as the main risk factors for the prosecution and conviction of orthodontists. https://seer-dev.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/51168Forensic Dentistry.Malpractice.Law.Orthodontics.
spellingShingle Fernando Fortes Picoli
Ademir Franco
Mayara Barbosa Viandelli Mundim-Picoli
Luiz Renato Paranhos
Rhonan Ferreira Silva
Why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted? an overview of the contemporary jurisprudence
Bioscience Journal
Forensic Dentistry.
Malpractice.
Law.
Orthodontics.
title Why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted? an overview of the contemporary jurisprudence
title_full Why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted? an overview of the contemporary jurisprudence
title_fullStr Why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted? an overview of the contemporary jurisprudence
title_full_unstemmed Why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted? an overview of the contemporary jurisprudence
title_short Why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted? an overview of the contemporary jurisprudence
title_sort why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted an overview of the contemporary jurisprudence
topic Forensic Dentistry.
Malpractice.
Law.
Orthodontics.
url https://seer-dev.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/51168
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandofortespicoli whyarebrazilianorthodontistsprosecutedandconvictedanoverviewofthecontemporaryjurisprudence
AT ademirfranco whyarebrazilianorthodontistsprosecutedandconvictedanoverviewofthecontemporaryjurisprudence
AT mayarabarbosaviandellimundimpicoli whyarebrazilianorthodontistsprosecutedandconvictedanoverviewofthecontemporaryjurisprudence
AT luizrenatoparanhos whyarebrazilianorthodontistsprosecutedandconvictedanoverviewofthecontemporaryjurisprudence
AT rhonanferreirasilva whyarebrazilianorthodontistsprosecutedandconvictedanoverviewofthecontemporaryjurisprudence