From 2D to 3D Cancer Cell Models—The Enigmas of Drug Delivery Research

Over the past decades, research has made impressive breakthroughs towards drug delivery systems, resulting in a wide range of multifunctional engineered nanoparticles with biomedical applications such as cancer therapy. Despite these significant advances, well-designed nanoparticles rarely reach the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Indra Van Zundert, Beatrice Fortuni, Susana Rocha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Nanomaterials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/11/2236
_version_ 1797548174886305792
author Indra Van Zundert
Beatrice Fortuni
Susana Rocha
author_facet Indra Van Zundert
Beatrice Fortuni
Susana Rocha
author_sort Indra Van Zundert
collection DOAJ
description Over the past decades, research has made impressive breakthroughs towards drug delivery systems, resulting in a wide range of multifunctional engineered nanoparticles with biomedical applications such as cancer therapy. Despite these significant advances, well-designed nanoparticles rarely reach the clinical stage. Promising results obtained in standard 2D cell culture systems often turn into disappointing outcomes in in vivo models. Although the overall majority of in vitro nanoparticle research is still performed on 2D monolayer cultures, more and more researchers started acknowledging the importance of using 3D cell culture systems, as better models for mimicking the in vivo tumor physiology. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the 3D cancer cell models currently available. We highlight their potential as a platform for drug delivery studies and pinpoint the challenges associated with their use. We discuss in which way each 3D model mimics the in vivo tumor physiology, how they can or have been used in nanomedicine research and to what extent the results obtained so far affect the progress of nanomedicine development. It is of note that the global scientific output associated with 3D models is limited, showing that the use of these systems in nanomedicine investigation is still highly challenging.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:55:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-462b4e55f8fc458c9b053b4482754624
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-4991
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:55:44Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nanomaterials
spelling doaj.art-462b4e55f8fc458c9b053b44827546242023-11-20T20:34:19ZengMDPI AGNanomaterials2079-49912020-11-011011223610.3390/nano10112236From 2D to 3D Cancer Cell Models—The Enigmas of Drug Delivery ResearchIndra Van Zundert0Beatrice Fortuni1Susana Rocha2Molecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, 3001 Heverlee, BelgiumMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, 3001 Heverlee, BelgiumMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, 3001 Heverlee, BelgiumOver the past decades, research has made impressive breakthroughs towards drug delivery systems, resulting in a wide range of multifunctional engineered nanoparticles with biomedical applications such as cancer therapy. Despite these significant advances, well-designed nanoparticles rarely reach the clinical stage. Promising results obtained in standard 2D cell culture systems often turn into disappointing outcomes in in vivo models. Although the overall majority of in vitro nanoparticle research is still performed on 2D monolayer cultures, more and more researchers started acknowledging the importance of using 3D cell culture systems, as better models for mimicking the in vivo tumor physiology. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the 3D cancer cell models currently available. We highlight their potential as a platform for drug delivery studies and pinpoint the challenges associated with their use. We discuss in which way each 3D model mimics the in vivo tumor physiology, how they can or have been used in nanomedicine research and to what extent the results obtained so far affect the progress of nanomedicine development. It is of note that the global scientific output associated with 3D models is limited, showing that the use of these systems in nanomedicine investigation is still highly challenging.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/11/2236nanoparticlesdrug delivery systemsspheroids3D culture systems3D cell models
spellingShingle Indra Van Zundert
Beatrice Fortuni
Susana Rocha
From 2D to 3D Cancer Cell Models—The Enigmas of Drug Delivery Research
Nanomaterials
nanoparticles
drug delivery systems
spheroids
3D culture systems
3D cell models
title From 2D to 3D Cancer Cell Models—The Enigmas of Drug Delivery Research
title_full From 2D to 3D Cancer Cell Models—The Enigmas of Drug Delivery Research
title_fullStr From 2D to 3D Cancer Cell Models—The Enigmas of Drug Delivery Research
title_full_unstemmed From 2D to 3D Cancer Cell Models—The Enigmas of Drug Delivery Research
title_short From 2D to 3D Cancer Cell Models—The Enigmas of Drug Delivery Research
title_sort from 2d to 3d cancer cell models the enigmas of drug delivery research
topic nanoparticles
drug delivery systems
spheroids
3D culture systems
3D cell models
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/11/2236
work_keys_str_mv AT indravanzundert from2dto3dcancercellmodelstheenigmasofdrugdeliveryresearch
AT beatricefortuni from2dto3dcancercellmodelstheenigmasofdrugdeliveryresearch
AT susanarocha from2dto3dcancercellmodelstheenigmasofdrugdeliveryresearch