The GenABEL Project for statistical genomics [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
Development of free/libre open source software is usually done by a community of people with an interest in the tool. For scientific software, however, this is less often the case. Most scientific software is written by only a few authors, often a student working on a thesis. Once the paper describi...
Main Authors: | Lennart C. Karssen, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Yurii S. Aulchenko |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2016-05-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://f1000research.com/articles/5-914/v1 |
Similar Items
-
The rise and fall of machine learning methods in biomedical research [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Hashem Koohy
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Further investigations of the W-test for pairwise epistasis testing [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: Richard Howey, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Method-centered digital communities on protocols.io for fast-paced scientific innovation [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Lori Kindler, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Top 10 metrics for life science software good practices [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: Haydee Artaza, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01) -
Digital Methodology to implement the ECOUTER engagement process [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Rebecca C. Wilson, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)