Has gene expression neofunctionalization in the fire ant antennae contributed to queen discrimination behavior?

Abstract Queen discrimination behavior in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta maintains its two types of societies: colonies with one (monogyne) or many (polygyne) queens, yet the underlying genetic mechanism is poorly understood. This behavior is controlled by two supergene alleles, SB and Sb, with ~60...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viet‐Dai Dang, Amir B. Cohanim, Silvia Fontana, Eyal Privman, John Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-11-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5748
_version_ 1818320973336674304
author Viet‐Dai Dang
Amir B. Cohanim
Silvia Fontana
Eyal Privman
John Wang
author_facet Viet‐Dai Dang
Amir B. Cohanim
Silvia Fontana
Eyal Privman
John Wang
author_sort Viet‐Dai Dang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Queen discrimination behavior in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta maintains its two types of societies: colonies with one (monogyne) or many (polygyne) queens, yet the underlying genetic mechanism is poorly understood. This behavior is controlled by two supergene alleles, SB and Sb, with ~600 genes. Polygyne workers, having either the SB/SB or SB/Sb genotype, accept additional SB/Sb queens into their colonies but kill SB/SB queens. In contrast, monogyne workers, all SB/SB, reject all additional queens regardless of genotype. Because the SB and Sb alleles have suppressed recombination, determining which genes within the supergene mediate this differential worker behavior is difficult. We hypothesized that the alternate worker genotypes sense queens differently because of the evolution of differential expression of key genes in their main sensory organ, the antennae. To identify such genes, we sequenced RNA from four replicates of pooled antennae from three classes of workers: monogyne SB/SB, polygyne SB/SB, and polygyne SB/Sb. We identified 81 differentially expressed protein‐coding genes with 13 encoding potential chemical metabolism or perception proteins. We focused on the two odorant perception genes: an odorant receptor SiOR463 and an odorant‐binding protein SiOBP12. We found that SiOR463 has been lost in the Sb genome. In contrast, SiOBP12 has an Sb‐specific duplication, SiOBP12b′, which is expressed in the SB/Sb worker antennae, while both paralogs are expressed in the body. Comparisons with another fire ant species revealed that SiOBP12b′ antennal expression is specific to S. invicta and suggests that queen discrimination may have evolved, in part, through expression neofunctionalization.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T10:33:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4640db4493f447f4b4c7c4087cac988a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T10:33:31Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-4640db4493f447f4b4c7c4087cac988a2022-12-21T23:50:47ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582019-11-01922127541276610.1002/ece3.5748Has gene expression neofunctionalization in the fire ant antennae contributed to queen discrimination behavior?Viet‐Dai Dang0Amir B. Cohanim1Silvia Fontana2Eyal Privman3John Wang4Biodiversity Research Center Academia Sinica Taipei TaiwanDepartment of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology Institute of Evolution University of Haifa Haifa IsraelBiodiversity Research Center Academia Sinica Taipei TaiwanDepartment of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology Institute of Evolution University of Haifa Haifa IsraelBiodiversity Research Center Academia Sinica Taipei TaiwanAbstract Queen discrimination behavior in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta maintains its two types of societies: colonies with one (monogyne) or many (polygyne) queens, yet the underlying genetic mechanism is poorly understood. This behavior is controlled by two supergene alleles, SB and Sb, with ~600 genes. Polygyne workers, having either the SB/SB or SB/Sb genotype, accept additional SB/Sb queens into their colonies but kill SB/SB queens. In contrast, monogyne workers, all SB/SB, reject all additional queens regardless of genotype. Because the SB and Sb alleles have suppressed recombination, determining which genes within the supergene mediate this differential worker behavior is difficult. We hypothesized that the alternate worker genotypes sense queens differently because of the evolution of differential expression of key genes in their main sensory organ, the antennae. To identify such genes, we sequenced RNA from four replicates of pooled antennae from three classes of workers: monogyne SB/SB, polygyne SB/SB, and polygyne SB/Sb. We identified 81 differentially expressed protein‐coding genes with 13 encoding potential chemical metabolism or perception proteins. We focused on the two odorant perception genes: an odorant receptor SiOR463 and an odorant‐binding protein SiOBP12. We found that SiOR463 has been lost in the Sb genome. In contrast, SiOBP12 has an Sb‐specific duplication, SiOBP12b′, which is expressed in the SB/Sb worker antennae, while both paralogs are expressed in the body. Comparisons with another fire ant species revealed that SiOBP12b′ antennal expression is specific to S. invicta and suggests that queen discrimination may have evolved, in part, through expression neofunctionalization.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5748fire antneofunctionalizationodorant‐binding proteinRNA‐SeqSolenopsis invictaworker antennae
spellingShingle Viet‐Dai Dang
Amir B. Cohanim
Silvia Fontana
Eyal Privman
John Wang
Has gene expression neofunctionalization in the fire ant antennae contributed to queen discrimination behavior?
Ecology and Evolution
fire ant
neofunctionalization
odorant‐binding protein
RNA‐Seq
Solenopsis invicta
worker antennae
title Has gene expression neofunctionalization in the fire ant antennae contributed to queen discrimination behavior?
title_full Has gene expression neofunctionalization in the fire ant antennae contributed to queen discrimination behavior?
title_fullStr Has gene expression neofunctionalization in the fire ant antennae contributed to queen discrimination behavior?
title_full_unstemmed Has gene expression neofunctionalization in the fire ant antennae contributed to queen discrimination behavior?
title_short Has gene expression neofunctionalization in the fire ant antennae contributed to queen discrimination behavior?
title_sort has gene expression neofunctionalization in the fire ant antennae contributed to queen discrimination behavior
topic fire ant
neofunctionalization
odorant‐binding protein
RNA‐Seq
Solenopsis invicta
worker antennae
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5748
work_keys_str_mv AT vietdaidang hasgeneexpressionneofunctionalizationinthefireantantennaecontributedtoqueendiscriminationbehavior
AT amirbcohanim hasgeneexpressionneofunctionalizationinthefireantantennaecontributedtoqueendiscriminationbehavior
AT silviafontana hasgeneexpressionneofunctionalizationinthefireantantennaecontributedtoqueendiscriminationbehavior
AT eyalprivman hasgeneexpressionneofunctionalizationinthefireantantennaecontributedtoqueendiscriminationbehavior
AT johnwang hasgeneexpressionneofunctionalizationinthefireantantennaecontributedtoqueendiscriminationbehavior