Artificial neural networks outperform linear regression in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes after upper extremity fractures with increasing number of variables

Abstract. Objective:. To compare performance between linear regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after upper extremity fractures using various subsets of early mental, social, and physical health variables. Methods:. We stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niels Brinkman, BS, Romil Shah, MD, Job Doornberg, MD, PhD, David Ring, MD, PhD, Stephen Gwilym, DPhil, FRCS(Orth), Prakash Jayakumar, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2024-01-01
Series:OTA International
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000284
_version_ 1797341005133905920
author Niels Brinkman, BS
Romil Shah, MD
Job Doornberg, MD, PhD
David Ring, MD, PhD
Stephen Gwilym, DPhil, FRCS(Orth)
Prakash Jayakumar, MD, PhD
author_facet Niels Brinkman, BS
Romil Shah, MD
Job Doornberg, MD, PhD
David Ring, MD, PhD
Stephen Gwilym, DPhil, FRCS(Orth)
Prakash Jayakumar, MD, PhD
author_sort Niels Brinkman, BS
collection DOAJ
description Abstract. Objective:. To compare performance between linear regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after upper extremity fractures using various subsets of early mental, social, and physical health variables. Methods:. We studied 734 patients with isolated shoulder, elbow, or wrist fracture who completed demographics, mental and social health measures, and PROs at baseline, 2–4 weeks, and 6–9 months postinjury. PROs included 3 measures of capability (QuickDASH, PROMIS-UE-PF, PROMIS-PI) and one of pain intensity. We developed ANN and LR models with various selections of variables (20, 23, 29, 34, and 54) to estimate 9-month PROs using a training subset (70%) and internally validated them using another subset (15%). We assessed the accuracy of the estimated value being within one MCID of the actual 9-month PRO value in a test subset (15%). Results:. ANNs outperformed LR in estimating 9-month outcomes in all models except the 20-variable model for capability measures and 20-variable and 23-variable models for pain intensity. The accuracy of ANN versus LR in the primary model (29-variable) was 83% versus 73% (Quick-DASH), 68% versus 65% (PROMIS-UE-PF), 66% versus 62% (PROMIS-PI), and 78% versus 65% (pain intensity). Mental and social health factors contributed most to the estimations. Conclusion:. ANNs outperform LR in estimating 9-month PROs, particularly with a larger number of variables. Given the otherwise relatively comparable performance, aspects such as practicality of collecting greater sets of variables, nonparametric distribution, and presence of nonlinear correlations should be considered when deciding between these statistical methods.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T10:12:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-464676695a56435ba234a29752d07ac1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2574-2167
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T10:12:31Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series OTA International
spelling doaj.art-464676695a56435ba234a29752d07ac12024-01-29T07:02:03ZengWolters KluwerOTA International2574-21672024-01-0171S10.1097/OI9.0000000000000284OI90000000000000284Artificial neural networks outperform linear regression in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes after upper extremity fractures with increasing number of variablesNiels Brinkman, BS0Romil Shah, MD1Job Doornberg, MD, PhD2David Ring, MD, PhD3Stephen Gwilym, DPhil, FRCS(Orth)4Prakash Jayakumar, MD, PhD5a Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TXa Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TXb Department of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlandsa Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TXd The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdoma Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TXAbstract. Objective:. To compare performance between linear regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after upper extremity fractures using various subsets of early mental, social, and physical health variables. Methods:. We studied 734 patients with isolated shoulder, elbow, or wrist fracture who completed demographics, mental and social health measures, and PROs at baseline, 2–4 weeks, and 6–9 months postinjury. PROs included 3 measures of capability (QuickDASH, PROMIS-UE-PF, PROMIS-PI) and one of pain intensity. We developed ANN and LR models with various selections of variables (20, 23, 29, 34, and 54) to estimate 9-month PROs using a training subset (70%) and internally validated them using another subset (15%). We assessed the accuracy of the estimated value being within one MCID of the actual 9-month PRO value in a test subset (15%). Results:. ANNs outperformed LR in estimating 9-month outcomes in all models except the 20-variable model for capability measures and 20-variable and 23-variable models for pain intensity. The accuracy of ANN versus LR in the primary model (29-variable) was 83% versus 73% (Quick-DASH), 68% versus 65% (PROMIS-UE-PF), 66% versus 62% (PROMIS-PI), and 78% versus 65% (pain intensity). Mental and social health factors contributed most to the estimations. Conclusion:. ANNs outperform LR in estimating 9-month PROs, particularly with a larger number of variables. Given the otherwise relatively comparable performance, aspects such as practicality of collecting greater sets of variables, nonparametric distribution, and presence of nonlinear correlations should be considered when deciding between these statistical methods.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000284
spellingShingle Niels Brinkman, BS
Romil Shah, MD
Job Doornberg, MD, PhD
David Ring, MD, PhD
Stephen Gwilym, DPhil, FRCS(Orth)
Prakash Jayakumar, MD, PhD
Artificial neural networks outperform linear regression in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes after upper extremity fractures with increasing number of variables
OTA International
title Artificial neural networks outperform linear regression in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes after upper extremity fractures with increasing number of variables
title_full Artificial neural networks outperform linear regression in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes after upper extremity fractures with increasing number of variables
title_fullStr Artificial neural networks outperform linear regression in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes after upper extremity fractures with increasing number of variables
title_full_unstemmed Artificial neural networks outperform linear regression in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes after upper extremity fractures with increasing number of variables
title_short Artificial neural networks outperform linear regression in estimating 9-month patient-reported outcomes after upper extremity fractures with increasing number of variables
title_sort artificial neural networks outperform linear regression in estimating 9 month patient reported outcomes after upper extremity fractures with increasing number of variables
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000284
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsbrinkmanbs artificialneuralnetworksoutperformlinearregressioninestimating9monthpatientreportedoutcomesafterupperextremityfractureswithincreasingnumberofvariables
AT romilshahmd artificialneuralnetworksoutperformlinearregressioninestimating9monthpatientreportedoutcomesafterupperextremityfractureswithincreasingnumberofvariables
AT jobdoornbergmdphd artificialneuralnetworksoutperformlinearregressioninestimating9monthpatientreportedoutcomesafterupperextremityfractureswithincreasingnumberofvariables
AT davidringmdphd artificialneuralnetworksoutperformlinearregressioninestimating9monthpatientreportedoutcomesafterupperextremityfractureswithincreasingnumberofvariables
AT stephengwilymdphilfrcsorth artificialneuralnetworksoutperformlinearregressioninestimating9monthpatientreportedoutcomesafterupperextremityfractureswithincreasingnumberofvariables
AT prakashjayakumarmdphd artificialneuralnetworksoutperformlinearregressioninestimating9monthpatientreportedoutcomesafterupperextremityfractureswithincreasingnumberofvariables