Towards an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments
Argumentation is a crucial component of our lives. Although in the absence of rational debate our legal, political, and scientific systems would not be possible, there is still no integrated area of research on the psychology of argumentation. Furthermore, classical theories of argumentation are nor...
Main Authors: | Marco eLillo-Unglaube, Andres eCanales-Johnson, Gorka eNavarrete, Claudio eFuentes |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01420/full |
Similar Items
-
The Slippery Slope Argument in the Context of Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
by: A. V. Antipov
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Perelman, argument ad hominem et ethos rhétorique
by: Michael Leff
Published: (2009-04-01) -
Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments
by: Patrick Bondy
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments
by: Patrick Bondy
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Ad Hominem Arguments, Rhetoric, and Science Communication
by: Martini Carlo
Published: (2018-09-01)