Pesticides in the atmosphere: a comparison of gas-particle partitioning and particle size distribution of legacy and current-use pesticides

This study presents a comparison of seasonal variation, gas-particle partitioning, and particle-phase size distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and current-use pesticides (CUPs) in air. Two years (2012/2013) of weekly air samples were collected at a background site in the Czech Repub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Degrendele, K. Okonski, L. Melymuk, L. Landlová, P. Kukučka, O. Audy, J. Kohoutek, P. Čupr, J. Klánová
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-02-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/1531/2016/acp-16-1531-2016.pdf
_version_ 1818038342707576832
author C. Degrendele
C. Degrendele
K. Okonski
L. Melymuk
L. Landlová
P. Kukučka
O. Audy
J. Kohoutek
P. Čupr
J. Klánová
author_facet C. Degrendele
C. Degrendele
K. Okonski
L. Melymuk
L. Landlová
P. Kukučka
O. Audy
J. Kohoutek
P. Čupr
J. Klánová
author_sort C. Degrendele
collection DOAJ
description This study presents a comparison of seasonal variation, gas-particle partitioning, and particle-phase size distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and current-use pesticides (CUPs) in air. Two years (2012/2013) of weekly air samples were collected at a background site in the Czech Republic using a high-volume air sampler. To study the particle-phase size distribution, air samples were also collected at an urban and rural site in the area of Brno, Czech Republic, using a cascade impactor separating atmospheric particulates according to six size fractions. Major differences were found in the atmospheric distribution of OCPs and CUPs. The atmospheric concentrations of CUPs were driven by agricultural activities while secondary sources such as volatilization from surfaces governed the atmospheric concentrations of OCPs. Moreover, clear differences were observed in gas-particle partitioning; CUP partitioning was influenced by adsorption onto mineral surfaces while OCPs were mainly partitioning to aerosols through absorption. A predictive method for estimating the gas-particle partitioning has been derived and is proposed for polar and non-polar pesticides. Finally, while OCPs and the majority of CUPs were largely found on fine particles, four CUPs (carbendazim, isoproturon, prochloraz, and terbuthylazine) had higher concentrations on coarse particles ( >  3.0 µm), which may be related to the pesticide application technique. This finding is particularly important and should be further investigated given that large particles result in lower risks from inhalation (regardless the toxicity of the pesticide) and lower potential for long-range atmospheric transport.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T07:41:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-465455592a0a46dcb75dbe1b90b35617
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T07:41:13Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-465455592a0a46dcb75dbe1b90b356172022-12-22T01:57:18ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242016-02-01161531154410.5194/acp-16-1531-2016Pesticides in the atmosphere: a comparison of gas-particle partitioning and particle size distribution of legacy and current-use pesticidesC. Degrendele0C. Degrendele1K. Okonski2L. Melymuk3L. Landlová4P. Kukučka5O. Audy6J. Kohoutek7P. Čupr8J. Klánová9Masaryk University, RECETOX (Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment), Faculty of Science, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech RepublicMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, Multiphase Chemistry Department, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyMasaryk University, RECETOX (Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment), Faculty of Science, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech RepublicMasaryk University, RECETOX (Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment), Faculty of Science, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech RepublicMasaryk University, RECETOX (Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment), Faculty of Science, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech RepublicMasaryk University, RECETOX (Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment), Faculty of Science, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech RepublicMasaryk University, RECETOX (Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment), Faculty of Science, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech RepublicMasaryk University, RECETOX (Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment), Faculty of Science, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech RepublicMasaryk University, RECETOX (Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment), Faculty of Science, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech RepublicMasaryk University, RECETOX (Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment), Faculty of Science, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech RepublicThis study presents a comparison of seasonal variation, gas-particle partitioning, and particle-phase size distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and current-use pesticides (CUPs) in air. Two years (2012/2013) of weekly air samples were collected at a background site in the Czech Republic using a high-volume air sampler. To study the particle-phase size distribution, air samples were also collected at an urban and rural site in the area of Brno, Czech Republic, using a cascade impactor separating atmospheric particulates according to six size fractions. Major differences were found in the atmospheric distribution of OCPs and CUPs. The atmospheric concentrations of CUPs were driven by agricultural activities while secondary sources such as volatilization from surfaces governed the atmospheric concentrations of OCPs. Moreover, clear differences were observed in gas-particle partitioning; CUP partitioning was influenced by adsorption onto mineral surfaces while OCPs were mainly partitioning to aerosols through absorption. A predictive method for estimating the gas-particle partitioning has been derived and is proposed for polar and non-polar pesticides. Finally, while OCPs and the majority of CUPs were largely found on fine particles, four CUPs (carbendazim, isoproturon, prochloraz, and terbuthylazine) had higher concentrations on coarse particles ( >  3.0 µm), which may be related to the pesticide application technique. This finding is particularly important and should be further investigated given that large particles result in lower risks from inhalation (regardless the toxicity of the pesticide) and lower potential for long-range atmospheric transport.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/1531/2016/acp-16-1531-2016.pdf
spellingShingle C. Degrendele
C. Degrendele
K. Okonski
L. Melymuk
L. Landlová
P. Kukučka
O. Audy
J. Kohoutek
P. Čupr
J. Klánová
Pesticides in the atmosphere: a comparison of gas-particle partitioning and particle size distribution of legacy and current-use pesticides
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Pesticides in the atmosphere: a comparison of gas-particle partitioning and particle size distribution of legacy and current-use pesticides
title_full Pesticides in the atmosphere: a comparison of gas-particle partitioning and particle size distribution of legacy and current-use pesticides
title_fullStr Pesticides in the atmosphere: a comparison of gas-particle partitioning and particle size distribution of legacy and current-use pesticides
title_full_unstemmed Pesticides in the atmosphere: a comparison of gas-particle partitioning and particle size distribution of legacy and current-use pesticides
title_short Pesticides in the atmosphere: a comparison of gas-particle partitioning and particle size distribution of legacy and current-use pesticides
title_sort pesticides in the atmosphere a comparison of gas particle partitioning and particle size distribution of legacy and current use pesticides
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/1531/2016/acp-16-1531-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cdegrendele pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides
AT cdegrendele pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides
AT kokonski pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides
AT lmelymuk pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides
AT llandlova pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides
AT pkukucka pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides
AT oaudy pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides
AT jkohoutek pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides
AT pcupr pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides
AT jklanova pesticidesintheatmosphereacomparisonofgasparticlepartitioningandparticlesizedistributionoflegacyandcurrentusepesticides