Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screening

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is replacing cytological screening for cervical cancer. Our aim was to assess the expected benefits and harms of different cervical screening strategies. This study is sub-analysis of a previous cost-effectiveness study with a target population of unscreened women...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosa Catarino, Pierre Vassilakos, Patrick Petignat, Christophe Combescure
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-10-01
Series:Preventive Medicine Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335522002364
_version_ 1828147686260342784
author Rosa Catarino
Pierre Vassilakos
Patrick Petignat
Christophe Combescure
author_facet Rosa Catarino
Pierre Vassilakos
Patrick Petignat
Christophe Combescure
author_sort Rosa Catarino
collection DOAJ
description Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is replacing cytological screening for cervical cancer. Our aim was to assess the expected benefits and harms of different cervical screening strategies. This study is sub-analysis of a previous cost-effectiveness study with a target population of unscreened women without cervical cancer aged ≥ 25 years. A recursive decision-tree with one-year cycles was used to model the life-long natural HPV history. Markov cohort simulations were used to assess the expected outcomes from the model. The outcomes of three strategies were compared with the absence of screening: HPV-testing on self-collected vaginal samples (Self-HPV) followed by colposcopy (Self-HPV/colpo), Self-HPV and triage with cytology (Self-HPV/PAP), cytology and triage with HPV (PAP/HPV). All screening strategies resulted in reductions in cancer cases and deaths. Self-HPV strategies were associated with a lower cancer incidence and mortality life-long, not only when performed every 3 years but also when Self-HPV was performed every 5 years vs cytology every 3 years. The gain in life expectancy obtained was 82 days with Self-HPV/colpo, 81 days with Self-HPV/PAP and 75 days with PAP/HPV compared to no screening. The number of lifetime total visits was greater with PAP/HPV compared with the Self-HPV strategies (13.13 vs < 3). The number of conizations remained relatively stable with the change of screening frequency and strategy. Self-HPV may represent a reasonable balance of harms and benefits when performed every 5 years compared to cytology every 3 years. Self-HPV/PAP yielded the most efficient harm to benefit ratio when using colposcopy as a proxy for harms.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:03:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-466601b6b90b4432aec565e61a7db935
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2211-3355
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:03:51Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Preventive Medicine Reports
spelling doaj.art-466601b6b90b4432aec565e61a7db9352022-12-22T04:03:24ZengElsevierPreventive Medicine Reports2211-33552022-10-0129101929Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screeningRosa Catarino0Pierre Vassilakos1Patrick Petignat2Christophe Combescure3Department of Paediatrics, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Boulevard de la Cluse 30, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; Corresponding author at: Division of Gynaecology, Geneva University Hospitals, Boulevard de la Cluse 30, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.Department of Paediatrics, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Boulevard de la Cluse 30, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Route de Ferney 150, 1211 Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Paediatrics, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Boulevard de la Cluse 30, 1205 Geneva, SwitzerlandDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Geneva, SwitzerlandHuman papillomavirus (HPV) testing is replacing cytological screening for cervical cancer. Our aim was to assess the expected benefits and harms of different cervical screening strategies. This study is sub-analysis of a previous cost-effectiveness study with a target population of unscreened women without cervical cancer aged ≥ 25 years. A recursive decision-tree with one-year cycles was used to model the life-long natural HPV history. Markov cohort simulations were used to assess the expected outcomes from the model. The outcomes of three strategies were compared with the absence of screening: HPV-testing on self-collected vaginal samples (Self-HPV) followed by colposcopy (Self-HPV/colpo), Self-HPV and triage with cytology (Self-HPV/PAP), cytology and triage with HPV (PAP/HPV). All screening strategies resulted in reductions in cancer cases and deaths. Self-HPV strategies were associated with a lower cancer incidence and mortality life-long, not only when performed every 3 years but also when Self-HPV was performed every 5 years vs cytology every 3 years. The gain in life expectancy obtained was 82 days with Self-HPV/colpo, 81 days with Self-HPV/PAP and 75 days with PAP/HPV compared to no screening. The number of lifetime total visits was greater with PAP/HPV compared with the Self-HPV strategies (13.13 vs < 3). The number of conizations remained relatively stable with the change of screening frequency and strategy. Self-HPV may represent a reasonable balance of harms and benefits when performed every 5 years compared to cytology every 3 years. Self-HPV/PAP yielded the most efficient harm to benefit ratio when using colposcopy as a proxy for harms.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335522002364Cervical cancer screeningDeveloped countriesHarmsHPV testingScreening frequencySelf-HPV
spellingShingle Rosa Catarino
Pierre Vassilakos
Patrick Petignat
Christophe Combescure
Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screening
Preventive Medicine Reports
Cervical cancer screening
Developed countries
Harms
HPV testing
Screening frequency
Self-HPV
title Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screening
title_full Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screening
title_fullStr Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screening
title_full_unstemmed Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screening
title_short Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screening
title_sort harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non attenders in switzerland the transition towards hpv based screening
topic Cervical cancer screening
Developed countries
Harms
HPV testing
Screening frequency
Self-HPV
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335522002364
work_keys_str_mv AT rosacatarino harmsandbenefitsofcervicalcancerscreeningamongnonattendersinswitzerlandthetransitiontowardshpvbasedscreening
AT pierrevassilakos harmsandbenefitsofcervicalcancerscreeningamongnonattendersinswitzerlandthetransitiontowardshpvbasedscreening
AT patrickpetignat harmsandbenefitsofcervicalcancerscreeningamongnonattendersinswitzerlandthetransitiontowardshpvbasedscreening
AT christophecombescure harmsandbenefitsofcervicalcancerscreeningamongnonattendersinswitzerlandthetransitiontowardshpvbasedscreening