Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma

Objective:Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare tumor, and data on prognosis are limited. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors in small bowel adenocarcinoma in this study.Method:Twenty-two patients were evaluated. Clinicopathological features and treatment appr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: İzzet Doğan, Didem Taştekin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2022-06-01
Series:Bagcilar Medical Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access: http://behmedicalbulletin.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/clinicopathological-features-and-prognostic-factor/52128
_version_ 1797920788969422848
author İzzet Doğan
Didem Taştekin
author_facet İzzet Doğan
Didem Taştekin
author_sort İzzet Doğan
collection DOAJ
description Objective:Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare tumor, and data on prognosis are limited. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors in small bowel adenocarcinoma in this study.Method:Twenty-two patients were evaluated. Clinicopathological features and treatment approaches were retrospectively recorded. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall survival and prognostic factors.Results:The origin sites of the tumor were the duodenum (50%), jejunum (31.8%), and ileum (18.2%), respectively. The number of de novo metastatic patients was 11 (50%). The most common metastatic sites were the peritoneum (%45), liver (%41), and lymph nodes (18%). The median overall survival was 19.9 months (7.3-32.5). One- and two-year survival ratios were 65.9% and 39%, respectively. The response ratio (complete or partial) of first-line chemotherapy in metastatic patients was determined as 46.2%. In multivariate analysis, surgery (p=0.024) and age at diagnosis (p=0.017) were statistically significant prognostic factors for overall survival. However, the site of the tumor (p=0.106), de novo metastatic disease (p=0.323), and the number of metastatic sites (p=0.086) were not.Conclusion:Patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma were diagnosed in advanced stages, and the prognosis of the disease was poor. We observed that removing the primary tumor improved survival, and being older than 60 years was a negative prognostic factor.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T14:07:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4676a1b23bcb45529ab64a49dc745afc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2547-9431
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T14:07:37Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Bagcilar Medical Bulletin
spelling doaj.art-4676a1b23bcb45529ab64a49dc745afc2023-02-15T16:09:55ZengGalenos YayineviBagcilar Medical Bulletin2547-94312022-06-017214414910.4274/BMB.galenos.2022.2022-02-01513049054Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinomaİzzet Doğan0Didem Taştekin1 İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey Objective:Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare tumor, and data on prognosis are limited. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors in small bowel adenocarcinoma in this study.Method:Twenty-two patients were evaluated. Clinicopathological features and treatment approaches were retrospectively recorded. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall survival and prognostic factors.Results:The origin sites of the tumor were the duodenum (50%), jejunum (31.8%), and ileum (18.2%), respectively. The number of de novo metastatic patients was 11 (50%). The most common metastatic sites were the peritoneum (%45), liver (%41), and lymph nodes (18%). The median overall survival was 19.9 months (7.3-32.5). One- and two-year survival ratios were 65.9% and 39%, respectively. The response ratio (complete or partial) of first-line chemotherapy in metastatic patients was determined as 46.2%. In multivariate analysis, surgery (p=0.024) and age at diagnosis (p=0.017) were statistically significant prognostic factors for overall survival. However, the site of the tumor (p=0.106), de novo metastatic disease (p=0.323), and the number of metastatic sites (p=0.086) were not.Conclusion:Patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma were diagnosed in advanced stages, and the prognosis of the disease was poor. We observed that removing the primary tumor improved survival, and being older than 60 years was a negative prognostic factor. http://behmedicalbulletin.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/clinicopathological-features-and-prognostic-factor/52128 chemotherapyprognosissmall bowel adenocarcinoma
spellingShingle İzzet Doğan
Didem Taştekin
Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma
Bagcilar Medical Bulletin
chemotherapy
prognosis
small bowel adenocarcinoma
title Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma
title_full Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma
title_short Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma
title_sort clinicopathological features and prognostic factors in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma
topic chemotherapy
prognosis
small bowel adenocarcinoma
url http://behmedicalbulletin.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/clinicopathological-features-and-prognostic-factor/52128
work_keys_str_mv AT izzetdogan clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithsmallboweladenocarcinoma
AT didemtastekin clinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithsmallboweladenocarcinoma