The platelets’ perspective to pathogen reduction technologies

A wide variety of clinical conditions, associated with low circulating platelet counts, require platelet transfusion in order to normalize hemostatic function. Although single-donor apheresis platelets bear the lowest risk of transfusion-transmitted infections, pathogen reduction technologies (PRT)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdimajid Osman, Walter E. Hitzler, Patrick Provost
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-02-01
Series:Platelets
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2017.1293806
_version_ 1827816984325128192
author Abdimajid Osman
Walter E. Hitzler
Patrick Provost
author_facet Abdimajid Osman
Walter E. Hitzler
Patrick Provost
author_sort Abdimajid Osman
collection DOAJ
description A wide variety of clinical conditions, associated with low circulating platelet counts, require platelet transfusion in order to normalize hemostatic function. Although single-donor apheresis platelets bear the lowest risk of transfusion-transmitted infections, pathogen reduction technologies (PRT) are being implemented worldwide to reduce this risk further through inactivation of known, emergent and as yet to be discovered nucleic acid-based pathogens. Human blood platelets are now known to harbor a diverse transcriptome, important to their function and comprised of >5000 protein-coding messenger RNAs and different classes of non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs. Our appreciation of the nucleic acid-dependent functions of platelets is likely to increase. On the other hand, the side effects of PRT on platelet function are underappreciated. Recent evidences suggest that PRT may compromise platelets’ responsiveness to agonists, and induce platelet activation. For instance, platelets have the propensity to release proinflammatory microparticles (MPs) upon activation, and the possibility that PRT may enhance the production of platelet MPs in platelet concentrates (PCs) appears likely. With this in mind, it would be timely and appropriate to investigate other means to inactivate pathogens more specifically, or to modify the currently available PRT so to better preserve the platelet function and improve the safety of PCs; platelets’ perspective to PRT deserves to be considered.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:28:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4679041cf80e413091e95a970be4aaa7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0953-7104
1369-1635
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:28:03Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Platelets
spelling doaj.art-4679041cf80e413091e95a970be4aaa72023-09-15T10:31:57ZengTaylor & Francis GroupPlatelets0953-71041369-16352018-02-0129214014710.1080/09537104.2017.12938061293806The platelets’ perspective to pathogen reduction technologiesAbdimajid Osman0Walter E. Hitzler1Patrick Provost2Department of Clinical ChemistryTransfusion Center, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University MainzCHUQ Research Center/CHULA wide variety of clinical conditions, associated with low circulating platelet counts, require platelet transfusion in order to normalize hemostatic function. Although single-donor apheresis platelets bear the lowest risk of transfusion-transmitted infections, pathogen reduction technologies (PRT) are being implemented worldwide to reduce this risk further through inactivation of known, emergent and as yet to be discovered nucleic acid-based pathogens. Human blood platelets are now known to harbor a diverse transcriptome, important to their function and comprised of >5000 protein-coding messenger RNAs and different classes of non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs. Our appreciation of the nucleic acid-dependent functions of platelets is likely to increase. On the other hand, the side effects of PRT on platelet function are underappreciated. Recent evidences suggest that PRT may compromise platelets’ responsiveness to agonists, and induce platelet activation. For instance, platelets have the propensity to release proinflammatory microparticles (MPs) upon activation, and the possibility that PRT may enhance the production of platelet MPs in platelet concentrates (PCs) appears likely. With this in mind, it would be timely and appropriate to investigate other means to inactivate pathogens more specifically, or to modify the currently available PRT so to better preserve the platelet function and improve the safety of PCs; platelets’ perspective to PRT deserves to be considered.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2017.1293806nucleic acidspathogen reduction technologiesplatelet activationplatelet concentraterna transcriptome
spellingShingle Abdimajid Osman
Walter E. Hitzler
Patrick Provost
The platelets’ perspective to pathogen reduction technologies
Platelets
nucleic acids
pathogen reduction technologies
platelet activation
platelet concentrate
rna transcriptome
title The platelets’ perspective to pathogen reduction technologies
title_full The platelets’ perspective to pathogen reduction technologies
title_fullStr The platelets’ perspective to pathogen reduction technologies
title_full_unstemmed The platelets’ perspective to pathogen reduction technologies
title_short The platelets’ perspective to pathogen reduction technologies
title_sort platelets perspective to pathogen reduction technologies
topic nucleic acids
pathogen reduction technologies
platelet activation
platelet concentrate
rna transcriptome
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2017.1293806
work_keys_str_mv AT abdimajidosman theplateletsperspectivetopathogenreductiontechnologies
AT walterehitzler theplateletsperspectivetopathogenreductiontechnologies
AT patrickprovost theplateletsperspectivetopathogenreductiontechnologies
AT abdimajidosman plateletsperspectivetopathogenreductiontechnologies
AT walterehitzler plateletsperspectivetopathogenreductiontechnologies
AT patrickprovost plateletsperspectivetopathogenreductiontechnologies