Water availability trends across water management zones in Uganda

Abstract This study assessed trends in gridded (0.25° × 0.25°) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) precipitation, potential evapotranspiration (PET), and precipitation minus PET (PMP) across the four water management zones (WMZs) in Uganda including Kyoga, Victoria, Albert, and Upper Nile. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charles Onyutha, Arnold Asiimwe, Lawrence Muhwezi, Ambrose Mubialiwo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-10-01
Series:Atmospheric Science Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1059
_version_ 1819293724066185216
author Charles Onyutha
Arnold Asiimwe
Lawrence Muhwezi
Ambrose Mubialiwo
author_facet Charles Onyutha
Arnold Asiimwe
Lawrence Muhwezi
Ambrose Mubialiwo
author_sort Charles Onyutha
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study assessed trends in gridded (0.25° × 0.25°) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) precipitation, potential evapotranspiration (PET), and precipitation minus PET (PMP) across the four water management zones (WMZs) in Uganda including Kyoga, Victoria, Albert, and Upper Nile. The period considered was 1979–2013. Validation of CFSR datasets was conducted using precipitation observed at eight meteorological stations across the country. Observed precipitation trend direction was satisfactorily reproduced by CFSR data extracted at five out of eight stations. Negative (positive) values of long‐term PMP mean were considered to indicate areas characterized by water scarcity (surplus). Areas with large positive PMP were confined to Lake Victoria and mountains such as Rwenzori and Elgon. The largest negative PMP values were in the arid and semi‐arid areas of north and northeastern Uganda. The null hypothesis H0 (no trend) was rejected (p < 0.05) for increasing annual precipitation trends across the various WMZs except in the extreme eastern parts of the Upper Nile, Kyoga, and Victoria WMZs (or areas along the boundary of Uganda and Kenya). The H0 (no trend) was rejected (p < 0.05) for decreasing trends in annual PET over West Nile region of the Upper Nile, western parts of Victoria, and the Albert WMZs. For increasing trend in PMP, the H0 (no trend) was rejected (p < 0.05) across the various WMZs except around the Mount Elgon area. The study findings are relevant for planning of water resources management across the different WMZs in the country.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T04:14:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-467ee8aa1b524a0fa1a56449057df5d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1530-261X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T04:14:58Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Science Letters
spelling doaj.art-467ee8aa1b524a0fa1a56449057df5d42022-12-21T17:15:58ZengWileyAtmospheric Science Letters1530-261X2021-10-012210n/an/a10.1002/asl.1059Water availability trends across water management zones in UgandaCharles Onyutha0Arnold Asiimwe1Lawrence Muhwezi2Ambrose Mubialiwo3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Kyambogo University Kampala UgandaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Kyambogo University Kampala UgandaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Kyambogo University Kampala UgandaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Kyambogo University Kampala UgandaAbstract This study assessed trends in gridded (0.25° × 0.25°) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) precipitation, potential evapotranspiration (PET), and precipitation minus PET (PMP) across the four water management zones (WMZs) in Uganda including Kyoga, Victoria, Albert, and Upper Nile. The period considered was 1979–2013. Validation of CFSR datasets was conducted using precipitation observed at eight meteorological stations across the country. Observed precipitation trend direction was satisfactorily reproduced by CFSR data extracted at five out of eight stations. Negative (positive) values of long‐term PMP mean were considered to indicate areas characterized by water scarcity (surplus). Areas with large positive PMP were confined to Lake Victoria and mountains such as Rwenzori and Elgon. The largest negative PMP values were in the arid and semi‐arid areas of north and northeastern Uganda. The null hypothesis H0 (no trend) was rejected (p < 0.05) for increasing annual precipitation trends across the various WMZs except in the extreme eastern parts of the Upper Nile, Kyoga, and Victoria WMZs (or areas along the boundary of Uganda and Kenya). The H0 (no trend) was rejected (p < 0.05) for decreasing trends in annual PET over West Nile region of the Upper Nile, western parts of Victoria, and the Albert WMZs. For increasing trend in PMP, the H0 (no trend) was rejected (p < 0.05) across the various WMZs except around the Mount Elgon area. The study findings are relevant for planning of water resources management across the different WMZs in the country.https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1059potential evapotranspirationprecipitationtrend analysesUgandawater availabilitywater management zones
spellingShingle Charles Onyutha
Arnold Asiimwe
Lawrence Muhwezi
Ambrose Mubialiwo
Water availability trends across water management zones in Uganda
Atmospheric Science Letters
potential evapotranspiration
precipitation
trend analyses
Uganda
water availability
water management zones
title Water availability trends across water management zones in Uganda
title_full Water availability trends across water management zones in Uganda
title_fullStr Water availability trends across water management zones in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Water availability trends across water management zones in Uganda
title_short Water availability trends across water management zones in Uganda
title_sort water availability trends across water management zones in uganda
topic potential evapotranspiration
precipitation
trend analyses
Uganda
water availability
water management zones
url https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1059
work_keys_str_mv AT charlesonyutha wateravailabilitytrendsacrosswatermanagementzonesinuganda
AT arnoldasiimwe wateravailabilitytrendsacrosswatermanagementzonesinuganda
AT lawrencemuhwezi wateravailabilitytrendsacrosswatermanagementzonesinuganda
AT ambrosemubialiwo wateravailabilitytrendsacrosswatermanagementzonesinuganda