Dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a very frequent surgical complication, especially in major orthopedic procedures. Prophylaxis with pharmacological agents, including warfarin and subcutaneous injection of either low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or low-dose unfractionated heparin, and/or with mecha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Orietta Zaniolo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SEEd Medical Publishers 2009-09-01
Series:Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/172
_version_ 1811268565126348800
author Orietta Zaniolo
author_facet Orietta Zaniolo
author_sort Orietta Zaniolo
collection DOAJ
description Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a very frequent surgical complication, especially in major orthopedic procedures. Prophylaxis with pharmacological agents, including warfarin and subcutaneous injection of either low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or low-dose unfractionated heparin, and/or with mechanical methods has been shown to be effective and safe. Despite recommendations on the routine implementation of these prophylaxis methods, some surveys demonstrate that many patients currently don’t receive any prophylaxis. The recent introduction of dabigatran etexilate, a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor approved for VTE prophylaxis in total knee and hip substitution, represents a major advance in the provision of efficient anticoagulation therapy. Two pivotal randomized controlled multicenter trials assessed non-inferiority of dabigatran 150/220 mg/day versus enoxaparin 40 mg/day in the prevention of VTE after hip and knee replacement. From an economical point of view, an English modeling study on dabigatran cost/effectiveness showed it to be associated with lower cost and slightly higher gain in Quality Adjusted Life Years, thus dominating enoxaparin. Other analyses obtained results consistent with these, estimating inferior costs related to the use of dabigatran with respect to low weight heparin; this difference was mainly due to health personnel work for heparins subcutaneous administration. In Italy, acquisition costs for a 28-35 days therapeutic cycle of main antithrombotic drugs vary between 70 and 170 €, according to different distribution policy. Dabigatran, with a cost of 117 €, holds a medial position. Cost savings related to oral administration may partially offset the price difference between dabigatran and the less expensive options among LMWHs or, compared with the more expensive ones, add to pharmaceutical cost savings. In order to increase the effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis, the improvement of patient adherence to the prescribed strategy is needed. On this plane, dabigatran may be associated to some advantages, like the lack of drug and food interactions, the need for less frequent coagulation monitoring compared to vitamin K antagonists, and obviation of daily injections of parenteral agents. In conclusion, these considerations suggest that dabigatran may prove an interesting alternative in VTE prevention in orthopedic surgery.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:24:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-469c5d92e1c54c50a59ee978aa15e556
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2240-256X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:24:34Z
publishDate 2009-09-01
publisher SEEd Medical Publishers
record_format Article
series Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
spelling doaj.art-469c5d92e1c54c50a59ee978aa15e5562022-12-22T03:16:12ZengSEEd Medical PublishersFarmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways2240-256X2009-09-0110311512810.7175/fe.v10i3.172154Dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgeryOrietta Zaniolo0AdRes, Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Torino

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a very frequent surgical complication, especially in major orthopedic procedures. Prophylaxis with pharmacological agents, including warfarin and subcutaneous injection of either low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or low-dose unfractionated heparin, and/or with mechanical methods has been shown to be effective and safe. Despite recommendations on the routine implementation of these prophylaxis methods, some surveys demonstrate that many patients currently don’t receive any prophylaxis. The recent introduction of dabigatran etexilate, a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor approved for VTE prophylaxis in total knee and hip substitution, represents a major advance in the provision of efficient anticoagulation therapy. Two pivotal randomized controlled multicenter trials assessed non-inferiority of dabigatran 150/220 mg/day versus enoxaparin 40 mg/day in the prevention of VTE after hip and knee replacement. From an economical point of view, an English modeling study on dabigatran cost/effectiveness showed it to be associated with lower cost and slightly higher gain in Quality Adjusted Life Years, thus dominating enoxaparin. Other analyses obtained results consistent with these, estimating inferior costs related to the use of dabigatran with respect to low weight heparin; this difference was mainly due to health personnel work for heparins subcutaneous administration. In Italy, acquisition costs for a 28-35 days therapeutic cycle of main antithrombotic drugs vary between 70 and 170 €, according to different distribution policy. Dabigatran, with a cost of 117 €, holds a medial position. Cost savings related to oral administration may partially offset the price difference between dabigatran and the less expensive options among LMWHs or, compared with the more expensive ones, add to pharmaceutical cost savings. In order to increase the effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis, the improvement of patient adherence to the prescribed strategy is needed. On this plane, dabigatran may be associated to some advantages, like the lack of drug and food interactions, the need for less frequent coagulation monitoring compared to vitamin K antagonists, and obviation of daily injections of parenteral agents. In conclusion, these considerations suggest that dabigatran may prove an interesting alternative in VTE prevention in orthopedic surgery.https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/172dabigatran etexilatevenous thromboembolismmajor orthopedic surgerycost-effectiveness
spellingShingle Orietta Zaniolo
Dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery
Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
dabigatran etexilate
venous thromboembolism
major orthopedic surgery
cost-effectiveness
title Dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery
title_full Dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery
title_fullStr Dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery
title_short Dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery
title_sort dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery
topic dabigatran etexilate
venous thromboembolism
major orthopedic surgery
cost-effectiveness
url https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/172
work_keys_str_mv AT oriettazaniolo dabigatraninthepreventionofvenousthromboembolismaftermajororthopedicsurgery