Occupational exposure to airborne chemical substances in paintings conservators

Background: This paper presents the results of the quantitative study of the airborne chemical substances detected in the conservator's work environment. Material and Methods: The quantitative tests were carried out in 6 museum easel paintings conservation studios. The air test samples were tak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Jeżewska, Małgorzata Szewczyńska, Agnieszka Woźnica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine 2014-02-01
Series:Medycyna Pracy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Narazenie-konserwatorow-malarstwa-na-substancje-chemiczne-wystepujace-w-powietrzu-srodowiska-pracy,409,0,2.html
_version_ 1817980009494609920
author Anna Jeżewska
Małgorzata Szewczyńska
Agnieszka Woźnica
author_facet Anna Jeżewska
Małgorzata Szewczyńska
Agnieszka Woźnica
author_sort Anna Jeżewska
collection DOAJ
description Background: This paper presents the results of the quantitative study of the airborne chemical substances detected in the conservator's work environment. Material and Methods: The quantitative tests were carried out in 6 museum easel paintings conservation studios. The air test samples were taken at various stages of restoration works, such as cleaning, doubling, impregnation, varnishing, retouching, just to name a few. The chemical substances in the sampled air were measured by the GC-FID (gas chromatography with flame ionization detector) test method. Results: The study results demonstrated that concentrations of airborne substances, e.g., toluene, 1,4-dioxane, turpentine and white spirit in the work environment of paintings conservators exceeded the values allowed by hygiene standards. It was found that exposure levels to the same chemical agents, released during similar activities, varied for different paintings conservation studios. It is likely that this discrepancy resulted from the indoor air exchange system for a given studio (e.g. type of ventilation and its efficiency), the size of the object under maintenance, and also from the methodology and protection used by individual employees. Conclusions: The levels of organic solvent vapors, present in the workplace air in the course of painting conservation, were found to be well above the occupational exposure limits, thus posing a threat to the worker's health. Med Pr 2014;65(1):33–41
first_indexed 2024-04-13T22:49:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-469d6133c454473c8959a54b67229630
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0465-5893
2353-1339
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T22:49:06Z
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
record_format Article
series Medycyna Pracy
spelling doaj.art-469d6133c454473c8959a54b672296302022-12-22T02:26:15ZengNofer Institute of Occupational MedicineMedycyna Pracy0465-58932353-13392014-02-01651334110.13075/mp.5893.2014.007Occupational exposure to airborne chemical substances in paintings conservatorsAnna JeżewskaMałgorzata SzewczyńskaAgnieszka WoźnicaBackground: This paper presents the results of the quantitative study of the airborne chemical substances detected in the conservator's work environment. Material and Methods: The quantitative tests were carried out in 6 museum easel paintings conservation studios. The air test samples were taken at various stages of restoration works, such as cleaning, doubling, impregnation, varnishing, retouching, just to name a few. The chemical substances in the sampled air were measured by the GC-FID (gas chromatography with flame ionization detector) test method. Results: The study results demonstrated that concentrations of airborne substances, e.g., toluene, 1,4-dioxane, turpentine and white spirit in the work environment of paintings conservators exceeded the values allowed by hygiene standards. It was found that exposure levels to the same chemical agents, released during similar activities, varied for different paintings conservation studios. It is likely that this discrepancy resulted from the indoor air exchange system for a given studio (e.g. type of ventilation and its efficiency), the size of the object under maintenance, and also from the methodology and protection used by individual employees. Conclusions: The levels of organic solvent vapors, present in the workplace air in the course of painting conservation, were found to be well above the occupational exposure limits, thus posing a threat to the worker's health. Med Pr 2014;65(1):33–41http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Narazenie-konserwatorow-malarstwa-na-substancje-chemiczne-wystepujace-w-powietrzu-srodowiska-pracy,409,0,2.htmlconservator of paintingschemical exposureworkplace environment
spellingShingle Anna Jeżewska
Małgorzata Szewczyńska
Agnieszka Woźnica
Occupational exposure to airborne chemical substances in paintings conservators
Medycyna Pracy
conservator of paintings
chemical exposure
workplace environment
title Occupational exposure to airborne chemical substances in paintings conservators
title_full Occupational exposure to airborne chemical substances in paintings conservators
title_fullStr Occupational exposure to airborne chemical substances in paintings conservators
title_full_unstemmed Occupational exposure to airborne chemical substances in paintings conservators
title_short Occupational exposure to airborne chemical substances in paintings conservators
title_sort occupational exposure to airborne chemical substances in paintings conservators
topic conservator of paintings
chemical exposure
workplace environment
url http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Narazenie-konserwatorow-malarstwa-na-substancje-chemiczne-wystepujace-w-powietrzu-srodowiska-pracy,409,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT annajezewska occupationalexposuretoairbornechemicalsubstancesinpaintingsconservators
AT małgorzataszewczynska occupationalexposuretoairbornechemicalsubstancesinpaintingsconservators
AT agnieszkawoznica occupationalexposuretoairbornechemicalsubstancesinpaintingsconservators