Contemporary Evaluation and Clinical Treatment Options for Aortic Regurgitation

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is the third most frequent form of valvular disease and has increasing prevalence with age. This will be of increasing clinical importance with the advancing age of populations around the globe. An understanding of the various etiologies and mechanisms leading to AR require...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Lebehn, Torsten Vahl, Polydoros Kampaktsis, Rebecca T. Hahn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/10/9/364
_version_ 1797579500506054656
author Mark Lebehn
Torsten Vahl
Polydoros Kampaktsis
Rebecca T. Hahn
author_facet Mark Lebehn
Torsten Vahl
Polydoros Kampaktsis
Rebecca T. Hahn
author_sort Mark Lebehn
collection DOAJ
description Aortic regurgitation (AR) is the third most frequent form of valvular disease and has increasing prevalence with age. This will be of increasing clinical importance with the advancing age of populations around the globe. An understanding of the various etiologies and mechanisms leading to AR requires a detailed understanding of the structure of the aortic valve and aortic root. While acute and chronic AR may share a similar etiology, their hemodynamic impact on the left ventricle (LV) and management are very different. Recent studies suggest current guideline recommendations for chronic disease may result in late intervention and suboptimal outcomes. Accurate quantitation of ventricular size and function, as well as grading of the severity of regurgitation, requires a multiparametric and multimodality imaging approach with an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each metric. Echocardiography remains the primary imaging modality for diagnosis with supplemental information provided by computed tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Emerging transcatheter therapies may allow the treatment of patients at high risk for surgery, although novel methods to assess AR severity and its impact on LV size and function may improve the timing and outcomes of surgical intervention.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:38:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46a62ac6c5074e9ca044ac894642a10a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2308-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:38:03Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
spelling doaj.art-46a62ac6c5074e9ca044ac894642a10a2023-11-19T11:16:23ZengMDPI AGJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease2308-34252023-08-0110936410.3390/jcdd10090364Contemporary Evaluation and Clinical Treatment Options for Aortic RegurgitationMark Lebehn0Torsten Vahl1Polydoros Kampaktsis2Rebecca T. Hahn3Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USADepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USADepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USADepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USAAortic regurgitation (AR) is the third most frequent form of valvular disease and has increasing prevalence with age. This will be of increasing clinical importance with the advancing age of populations around the globe. An understanding of the various etiologies and mechanisms leading to AR requires a detailed understanding of the structure of the aortic valve and aortic root. While acute and chronic AR may share a similar etiology, their hemodynamic impact on the left ventricle (LV) and management are very different. Recent studies suggest current guideline recommendations for chronic disease may result in late intervention and suboptimal outcomes. Accurate quantitation of ventricular size and function, as well as grading of the severity of regurgitation, requires a multiparametric and multimodality imaging approach with an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each metric. Echocardiography remains the primary imaging modality for diagnosis with supplemental information provided by computed tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Emerging transcatheter therapies may allow the treatment of patients at high risk for surgery, although novel methods to assess AR severity and its impact on LV size and function may improve the timing and outcomes of surgical intervention.https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/10/9/364aortic regurgitationechocardiographytranscatheter aortic valve replacement
spellingShingle Mark Lebehn
Torsten Vahl
Polydoros Kampaktsis
Rebecca T. Hahn
Contemporary Evaluation and Clinical Treatment Options for Aortic Regurgitation
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
aortic regurgitation
echocardiography
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title Contemporary Evaluation and Clinical Treatment Options for Aortic Regurgitation
title_full Contemporary Evaluation and Clinical Treatment Options for Aortic Regurgitation
title_fullStr Contemporary Evaluation and Clinical Treatment Options for Aortic Regurgitation
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary Evaluation and Clinical Treatment Options for Aortic Regurgitation
title_short Contemporary Evaluation and Clinical Treatment Options for Aortic Regurgitation
title_sort contemporary evaluation and clinical treatment options for aortic regurgitation
topic aortic regurgitation
echocardiography
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/10/9/364
work_keys_str_mv AT marklebehn contemporaryevaluationandclinicaltreatmentoptionsforaorticregurgitation
AT torstenvahl contemporaryevaluationandclinicaltreatmentoptionsforaorticregurgitation
AT polydoroskampaktsis contemporaryevaluationandclinicaltreatmentoptionsforaorticregurgitation
AT rebeccathahn contemporaryevaluationandclinicaltreatmentoptionsforaorticregurgitation