Differential Investment Strategies in Leaf Economic Traits Across Climate Regions Worldwide

The leaf economics spectrum (LES) is the leading theory of plant ecological strategies based on functional traits, which explains the trade-off between dry matter investment in leaf structure and the potential rate of resource return, revealing general patterns of leaf economic traits investment for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liang Ren, Yongmei Huang, Yingping Pan, Xiang Xiang, Jiaxuan Huo, Dehui Meng, Yuanyuan Wang, Cheng Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.798035/full
_version_ 1818487526672826368
author Liang Ren
Liang Ren
Yongmei Huang
Yongmei Huang
Yingping Pan
Yingping Pan
Xiang Xiang
Xiang Xiang
Jiaxuan Huo
Jiaxuan Huo
Dehui Meng
Dehui Meng
Yuanyuan Wang
Yuanyuan Wang
Cheng Yu
Cheng Yu
author_facet Liang Ren
Liang Ren
Yongmei Huang
Yongmei Huang
Yingping Pan
Yingping Pan
Xiang Xiang
Xiang Xiang
Jiaxuan Huo
Jiaxuan Huo
Dehui Meng
Dehui Meng
Yuanyuan Wang
Yuanyuan Wang
Cheng Yu
Cheng Yu
author_sort Liang Ren
collection DOAJ
description The leaf economics spectrum (LES) is the leading theory of plant ecological strategies based on functional traits, which explains the trade-off between dry matter investment in leaf structure and the potential rate of resource return, revealing general patterns of leaf economic traits investment for different plant growth types, functional types, or biomes. Prior work has revealed the moderating role of different environmental factors on the LES, but whether the leaf trait bivariate relationships are shifted across climate regions or across continental scales requires further verification. Here we use the Köppen–Geiger climate classification, a very widely used and robust criterion, as a basis for classifying climate regions to explore climatic differences in leaf trait relationships. We compiled five leaf economic traits from a global dataset, including leaf dry matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), photosynthesis per unit of leaf dry mass (Amass), leaf nitrogen concentration (Nmass), and leaf phosphorus concentration (Pmass). Moreover, we primarily used the standardized major axis (SMA) analysis to establish leaf trait bivariate relationships and to explore differences in trait relationships across climate regions as well as intercontinental differences within the same climate type. Leaf trait relationships were significantly correlated across almost all subgroups (P < 0.001). However, there was no common slope among different climate zones or climate types and the slopes of the groups fluctuated sharply up and down from the global estimates. The range of variation in the SMA slope of each leaf relationship was as follows: LDMC–SLA relationships (from −0.84 to −0.41); Amass–SLA relationships (from 0.83 to 1.97); Amass–Nmass relationships (from 1.33 to 2.25); Nmass–Pmass relationships (from 0.57 to 1.02). In addition, there was significant slope heterogeneity among continents within the Steppe climate (BS) or the Temperate humid climate (Cf). The shifts of leaf trait relationships in different climate regions provide evidence for environmentally driven differential plant investment in leaf economic traits. Understanding these differences helps to better calibrate various plant-climate models and reminds us that smaller-scale studies may need to be carefully compared with global studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T16:38:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46b259fd4e9c4c0f9e5d3190eca180af
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-462X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T16:38:50Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Plant Science
spelling doaj.art-46b259fd4e9c4c0f9e5d3190eca180af2022-12-22T01:41:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2022-03-011310.3389/fpls.2022.798035798035Differential Investment Strategies in Leaf Economic Traits Across Climate Regions WorldwideLiang Ren0Liang Ren1Yongmei Huang2Yongmei Huang3Yingping Pan4Yingping Pan5Xiang Xiang6Xiang Xiang7Jiaxuan Huo8Jiaxuan Huo9Dehui Meng10Dehui Meng11Yuanyuan Wang12Yuanyuan Wang13Cheng Yu14Cheng Yu15State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaThe leaf economics spectrum (LES) is the leading theory of plant ecological strategies based on functional traits, which explains the trade-off between dry matter investment in leaf structure and the potential rate of resource return, revealing general patterns of leaf economic traits investment for different plant growth types, functional types, or biomes. Prior work has revealed the moderating role of different environmental factors on the LES, but whether the leaf trait bivariate relationships are shifted across climate regions or across continental scales requires further verification. Here we use the Köppen–Geiger climate classification, a very widely used and robust criterion, as a basis for classifying climate regions to explore climatic differences in leaf trait relationships. We compiled five leaf economic traits from a global dataset, including leaf dry matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), photosynthesis per unit of leaf dry mass (Amass), leaf nitrogen concentration (Nmass), and leaf phosphorus concentration (Pmass). Moreover, we primarily used the standardized major axis (SMA) analysis to establish leaf trait bivariate relationships and to explore differences in trait relationships across climate regions as well as intercontinental differences within the same climate type. Leaf trait relationships were significantly correlated across almost all subgroups (P < 0.001). However, there was no common slope among different climate zones or climate types and the slopes of the groups fluctuated sharply up and down from the global estimates. The range of variation in the SMA slope of each leaf relationship was as follows: LDMC–SLA relationships (from −0.84 to −0.41); Amass–SLA relationships (from 0.83 to 1.97); Amass–Nmass relationships (from 1.33 to 2.25); Nmass–Pmass relationships (from 0.57 to 1.02). In addition, there was significant slope heterogeneity among continents within the Steppe climate (BS) or the Temperate humid climate (Cf). The shifts of leaf trait relationships in different climate regions provide evidence for environmentally driven differential plant investment in leaf economic traits. Understanding these differences helps to better calibrate various plant-climate models and reminds us that smaller-scale studies may need to be carefully compared with global studies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.798035/fullplant strategiesleaf economics spectrum (LES)functional traitstrade-offsKöppen–Geiger climate classificationallometry
spellingShingle Liang Ren
Liang Ren
Yongmei Huang
Yongmei Huang
Yingping Pan
Yingping Pan
Xiang Xiang
Xiang Xiang
Jiaxuan Huo
Jiaxuan Huo
Dehui Meng
Dehui Meng
Yuanyuan Wang
Yuanyuan Wang
Cheng Yu
Cheng Yu
Differential Investment Strategies in Leaf Economic Traits Across Climate Regions Worldwide
Frontiers in Plant Science
plant strategies
leaf economics spectrum (LES)
functional traits
trade-offs
Köppen–Geiger climate classification
allometry
title Differential Investment Strategies in Leaf Economic Traits Across Climate Regions Worldwide
title_full Differential Investment Strategies in Leaf Economic Traits Across Climate Regions Worldwide
title_fullStr Differential Investment Strategies in Leaf Economic Traits Across Climate Regions Worldwide
title_full_unstemmed Differential Investment Strategies in Leaf Economic Traits Across Climate Regions Worldwide
title_short Differential Investment Strategies in Leaf Economic Traits Across Climate Regions Worldwide
title_sort differential investment strategies in leaf economic traits across climate regions worldwide
topic plant strategies
leaf economics spectrum (LES)
functional traits
trade-offs
Köppen–Geiger climate classification
allometry
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.798035/full
work_keys_str_mv AT liangren differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT liangren differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT yongmeihuang differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT yongmeihuang differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT yingpingpan differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT yingpingpan differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT xiangxiang differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT xiangxiang differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT jiaxuanhuo differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT jiaxuanhuo differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT dehuimeng differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT dehuimeng differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT yuanyuanwang differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT yuanyuanwang differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT chengyu differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide
AT chengyu differentialinvestmentstrategiesinleafeconomictraitsacrossclimateregionsworldwide