Designing effective incentives for living shorelines as a habitat conservation strategy along residential coasts

Abstract Shoreline armoring is a pervasive driver of habitat loss and ecosystem decline along coastlines. Nature‐based strategies for coastal protection, such as “living shorelines,” offer potential alternatives to armoring and are rapidly gaining traction among conservation scientists and practitio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven B. Scyphers, Michael W. Beck, Kelsi L. Furman, Judy Haner, Andrew G. Keeler, Craig E. Landry, Kiera L. O'Donnell, Bret M. Webb, Jonathan H. Grabowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:Conservation Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12744
Description
Summary:Abstract Shoreline armoring is a pervasive driver of habitat loss and ecosystem decline along coastlines. Nature‐based strategies for coastal protection, such as “living shorelines,” offer potential alternatives to armoring and are rapidly gaining traction among conservation scientists and practitioners. However, along residential coasts where armoring has often occurred at high rates, transitioning away from armoring has been generally slow. We studied the attitudes, beliefs, and decisions of waterfront homeowners with a goal of identifying effective incentives for living shorelines as a conservation tool for reversing coastal habitat loss. We show that while only 18% of homeowners with armored shorelines would willingly transition to living shorelines during a key window of opportunity, a modest economic incentive could increase the likelihood among 43% of all respondents and up to 61% of recent homeowners. Our study demonstrates potential pathways for navigating social, economic, and environmental influences on landowner decisions for coastal habitat conservation.
ISSN:1755-263X