Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal Site
Coal fly ash and slag waste residuals from coal combustion are an issue of importance as one of the possible sources of environmental contamination and exposure to NORM. This study compares the results of different radiological risk assessment scenarios targeting terrestrial biota at a legacy site i...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Minerals |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/6/832 |
| _version_ | 1797593357770293248 |
|---|---|
| author | Ana Getaldić Marija Surić Mihić Želimir Veinović Božena Skoko Branko Petrinec Ivica Prlić |
| author_facet | Ana Getaldić Marija Surić Mihić Želimir Veinović Božena Skoko Branko Petrinec Ivica Prlić |
| author_sort | Ana Getaldić |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Coal fly ash and slag waste residuals from coal combustion are an issue of importance as one of the possible sources of environmental contamination and exposure to NORM. This study compares the results of different radiological risk assessment scenarios targeting terrestrial biota at a legacy site in Croatia that contains large quantities of coal ash with an enhanced content of radionuclides originating from previous industrial activities. The ERICA assessment tool was used for a risk assessment, which included data from borehole samples with a maximum depth of 6 m and trees as the primary reference organisms. The results of the risk assessments from various depth ranges found the radiological risk to the reference organisms to be negligible, regardless of the depth range, since the screening dose rate of 10 µGyh<sup>−1</sup> was not exceeded in any of the assessments. The risk assessment results from all depth ranges show higher total dose rate predictions when the tool’s default CR values are used, compared to the site-specific ones, which is in agreement with previous studies on the application of the ERICA tool. A comparison of results from different spatial radiological risk assessments showed that sample depth does not affect the estimated total dose rate to biota. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T02:07:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-46bcc3aacdeb4a3ab7dc78df1d1a1f30 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2075-163X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T02:07:06Z |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Minerals |
| spelling | doaj.art-46bcc3aacdeb4a3ab7dc78df1d1a1f302023-11-18T11:46:09ZengMDPI AGMinerals2075-163X2023-06-0113683210.3390/min13060832Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal SiteAna Getaldić0Marija Surić Mihić1Želimir Veinović2Božena Skoko3Branko Petrinec4Ivica Prlić5Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, p.p. 390, HR-10000 Zagreb, CroatiaCivil Protection Directorate, Ministry of the Interior, Nehajska 5, HR-10000 Zagreb, CroatiaFaculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, p.p. 390, HR-10000 Zagreb, CroatiaRuđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička cesta 54, HR-10000 Zagreb, CroatiaInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Ksaverska cesta 2, p.p. 291, HR-10001 Zagreb, CroatiaInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Ksaverska cesta 2, p.p. 291, HR-10001 Zagreb, CroatiaCoal fly ash and slag waste residuals from coal combustion are an issue of importance as one of the possible sources of environmental contamination and exposure to NORM. This study compares the results of different radiological risk assessment scenarios targeting terrestrial biota at a legacy site in Croatia that contains large quantities of coal ash with an enhanced content of radionuclides originating from previous industrial activities. The ERICA assessment tool was used for a risk assessment, which included data from borehole samples with a maximum depth of 6 m and trees as the primary reference organisms. The results of the risk assessments from various depth ranges found the radiological risk to the reference organisms to be negligible, regardless of the depth range, since the screening dose rate of 10 µGyh<sup>−1</sup> was not exceeded in any of the assessments. The risk assessment results from all depth ranges show higher total dose rate predictions when the tool’s default CR values are used, compared to the site-specific ones, which is in agreement with previous studies on the application of the ERICA tool. A comparison of results from different spatial radiological risk assessments showed that sample depth does not affect the estimated total dose rate to biota.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/6/832NORMcoal ash and slagradiological risk assessmentERICA toolenvironmental protection |
| spellingShingle | Ana Getaldić Marija Surić Mihić Želimir Veinović Božena Skoko Branko Petrinec Ivica Prlić Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal Site Minerals NORM coal ash and slag radiological risk assessment ERICA tool environmental protection |
| title | Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal Site |
| title_full | Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal Site |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal Site |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal Site |
| title_short | Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal Site |
| title_sort | comparison of different radiological risk assessment scenarios at a coal ash and slag disposal site |
| topic | NORM coal ash and slag radiological risk assessment ERICA tool environmental protection |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/6/832 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anagetaldic comparisonofdifferentradiologicalriskassessmentscenariosatacoalashandslagdisposalsite AT marijasuricmihic comparisonofdifferentradiologicalriskassessmentscenariosatacoalashandslagdisposalsite AT zelimirveinovic comparisonofdifferentradiologicalriskassessmentscenariosatacoalashandslagdisposalsite AT bozenaskoko comparisonofdifferentradiologicalriskassessmentscenariosatacoalashandslagdisposalsite AT brankopetrinec comparisonofdifferentradiologicalriskassessmentscenariosatacoalashandslagdisposalsite AT ivicaprlic comparisonofdifferentradiologicalriskassessmentscenariosatacoalashandslagdisposalsite |