Sex‐specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients

Abstract Aims Risk stratification models of sudden cardiac death (SCD) are based on the assumption that risk factors of SCD affect risk to a similar extent in both sexes. The aim of the study is to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes between sexes and evaluate whether risk factors associated w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne‐Lotte C.J. van derLingen, Dominic A.M.J. Theuns, Mischa T. Rijnierse, Marthe A.J. Becker, Peter M. van deVen, Albert C. vanRossum, Vokko P. vanHalm, Michiel J.B. Kemme, Sing C. Yap, Cornelis P. Allaart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-10-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13444
_version_ 1818738119311097856
author Anne‐Lotte C.J. van derLingen
Dominic A.M.J. Theuns
Mischa T. Rijnierse
Marthe A.J. Becker
Peter M. van deVen
Albert C. vanRossum
Vokko P. vanHalm
Michiel J.B. Kemme
Sing C. Yap
Cornelis P. Allaart
author_facet Anne‐Lotte C.J. van derLingen
Dominic A.M.J. Theuns
Mischa T. Rijnierse
Marthe A.J. Becker
Peter M. van deVen
Albert C. vanRossum
Vokko P. vanHalm
Michiel J.B. Kemme
Sing C. Yap
Cornelis P. Allaart
author_sort Anne‐Lotte C.J. van derLingen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Risk stratification models of sudden cardiac death (SCD) are based on the assumption that risk factors of SCD affect risk to a similar extent in both sexes. The aim of the study is to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes between sexes and evaluate whether risk factors associated with appropriate device therapy (ADT) differ between men and women. Methods and results We performed a cohort study of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients referred for primary or secondary prevention of SCD between 2009 and 2018. Multivariable Cox regression models for prediction of ADT were constructed for men and women separately. Of 2300 included patients, 571 (25%) were women. Median follow‐up was 4.6 (inter‐quartile range: 4.4–4.9) years. Time to ADT was shorter for men compared with women [hazard ratio (HR) 1.71, P < 0.001], as was time to mortality (HR 1.37, P = 0.003). In women, only secondary prevention ICD therapy (HR 1.82, P < 0.01) was associated with ADT, whereas higher age (HR 1.20, P < 0.001), absence of left bundle branch block (HR 0.72, P = 0.01), and secondary prevention therapy (HR 1.80, P < 0.001) were independently associated with ADT in men. None of the observed parameters showed a distinctive sex‐specific pattern in ADT. Conclusions Male ICD patients were at higher risk of ADT and death compared with female ICD patients, irrespective of an ischaemic or non‐ischaemic underlying cardiomyopathy. Our study highlights the importance to stratify outcomes of ICD trials by sex, as study results differ between men and women. However, none of the available clinical parameters showed a clear sex‐specific relation to ventricular arrhythmias. As a consequence, sex‐specific risk stratification models of SCD using commonly available clinical parameters could not be derived.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T01:03:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46bdb72b19104aa382ec0786781db1fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5822
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T01:03:52Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj.art-46bdb72b19104aa382ec0786781db1fc2022-12-21T21:26:18ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222021-10-01853726373610.1002/ehf2.13444Sex‐specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patientsAnne‐Lotte C.J. van derLingen0Dominic A.M.J. Theuns1Mischa T. Rijnierse2Marthe A.J. Becker3Peter M. van deVen4Albert C. vanRossum5Vokko P. vanHalm6Michiel J.B. Kemme7Sing C. Yap8Cornelis P. Allaart9Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1117 Amsterdam 1081 HV The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1117 Amsterdam 1081 HV The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1117 Amsterdam 1081 HV The NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1117 Amsterdam 1081 HV The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1117 Amsterdam 1081 HV The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1117 Amsterdam 1081 HV The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1117 Amsterdam 1081 HV The NetherlandsAbstract Aims Risk stratification models of sudden cardiac death (SCD) are based on the assumption that risk factors of SCD affect risk to a similar extent in both sexes. The aim of the study is to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes between sexes and evaluate whether risk factors associated with appropriate device therapy (ADT) differ between men and women. Methods and results We performed a cohort study of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients referred for primary or secondary prevention of SCD between 2009 and 2018. Multivariable Cox regression models for prediction of ADT were constructed for men and women separately. Of 2300 included patients, 571 (25%) were women. Median follow‐up was 4.6 (inter‐quartile range: 4.4–4.9) years. Time to ADT was shorter for men compared with women [hazard ratio (HR) 1.71, P < 0.001], as was time to mortality (HR 1.37, P = 0.003). In women, only secondary prevention ICD therapy (HR 1.82, P < 0.01) was associated with ADT, whereas higher age (HR 1.20, P < 0.001), absence of left bundle branch block (HR 0.72, P = 0.01), and secondary prevention therapy (HR 1.80, P < 0.001) were independently associated with ADT in men. None of the observed parameters showed a distinctive sex‐specific pattern in ADT. Conclusions Male ICD patients were at higher risk of ADT and death compared with female ICD patients, irrespective of an ischaemic or non‐ischaemic underlying cardiomyopathy. Our study highlights the importance to stratify outcomes of ICD trials by sex, as study results differ between men and women. However, none of the available clinical parameters showed a clear sex‐specific relation to ventricular arrhythmias. As a consequence, sex‐specific risk stratification models of SCD using commonly available clinical parameters could not be derived.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13444Implantable cardioverter defibrillatorSex differencesSudden cardiac deathRisk stratification
spellingShingle Anne‐Lotte C.J. van derLingen
Dominic A.M.J. Theuns
Mischa T. Rijnierse
Marthe A.J. Becker
Peter M. van deVen
Albert C. vanRossum
Vokko P. vanHalm
Michiel J.B. Kemme
Sing C. Yap
Cornelis P. Allaart
Sex‐specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients
ESC Heart Failure
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Sex differences
Sudden cardiac death
Risk stratification
title Sex‐specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients
title_full Sex‐specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients
title_fullStr Sex‐specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients
title_full_unstemmed Sex‐specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients
title_short Sex‐specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients
title_sort sex specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients
topic Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Sex differences
Sudden cardiac death
Risk stratification
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13444
work_keys_str_mv AT annelottecjvanderlingen sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT dominicamjtheuns sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT mischatrijnierse sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT martheajbecker sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT petermvandeven sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT albertcvanrossum sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT vokkopvanhalm sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT michieljbkemme sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT singcyap sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT cornelispallaart sexspecificdifferencesinoutcomeandriskstratificationofventriculararrhythmiasinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients