Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia

The experiment was conducted from 2009–2011 cropping seasons. Six mung bean genotypes viz. SML-668, Black bean, Bored, Local Gofa, SML-32 and Local 2-Sheraro were evaluated to early maturing and high yielding genotypes and the design was RCBD with three replications. The combined analysis of varianc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fiseha Baraki, Zenawi Gebregergis, Yirga Belay, Muez Berhe, Haile Zibelo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Cogent Food & Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1729581
_version_ 1818621593155272704
author Fiseha Baraki
Zenawi Gebregergis
Yirga Belay
Muez Berhe
Haile Zibelo
author_facet Fiseha Baraki
Zenawi Gebregergis
Yirga Belay
Muez Berhe
Haile Zibelo
author_sort Fiseha Baraki
collection DOAJ
description The experiment was conducted from 2009–2011 cropping seasons. Six mung bean genotypes viz. SML-668, Black bean, Bored, Local Gofa, SML-32 and Local 2-Sheraro were evaluated to early maturing and high yielding genotypes and the design was RCBD with three replications. The combined analysis of variance reviled that there was highly significant variation (p < 0.01) of grain yield among the genotypes, environments and genotype by environment interaction. The genotypic, environmental and the genotype x environment interaction (GIE) accounted about 30.47%, 45.01% and 11.59% of the total variation. The average grain yield of the genotypes was 2008.17 kg/ha. The highest and the lowest mean yield was obtained from SML-668 (2536.47 kg/ha) and SML-32 (1773.59 kg/ha) respectively. The AMMI bi-plot also depicted that, SML-668 and SML-32 were the high yielding and low yielding genotype, respectively. Similar to the AMMI bi-plot, the GGE bi-plot also confirmed that SML-668 was the winning genotype in most of the environments; whereas, SML-32 and local 2-sheraro, were the low yielding genotypes in some or all of the environments. E1, E2 and E6 are discriminating environments and declared as the most representative than E3, E4 and E5. Generally, SML-668 was the ideal genotype with higher mean yield and relatively good stability; Local-2 Sheraro was the moderately good yielding genotype and the most unstable genotype; Whereas, SML-32 was the poorly yielding and unstable genotype.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T18:11:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46c0796719cd4768ac569447bd9f5e1c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-1932
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T18:11:44Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Food & Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-46c0796719cd4768ac569447bd9f5e1c2022-12-21T22:21:45ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Food & Agriculture2331-19322020-01-016110.1080/23311932.2020.17295811729581Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern EthiopiaFiseha Baraki0Zenawi Gebregergis1Yirga Belay2Muez Berhe3Haile Zibelo4Humera Agricultural Research CenterHumera Agricultural Research CenterHumera Agricultural Research CenterHumera Agricultural Research CenterHumera Agricultural Research CenterThe experiment was conducted from 2009–2011 cropping seasons. Six mung bean genotypes viz. SML-668, Black bean, Bored, Local Gofa, SML-32 and Local 2-Sheraro were evaluated to early maturing and high yielding genotypes and the design was RCBD with three replications. The combined analysis of variance reviled that there was highly significant variation (p < 0.01) of grain yield among the genotypes, environments and genotype by environment interaction. The genotypic, environmental and the genotype x environment interaction (GIE) accounted about 30.47%, 45.01% and 11.59% of the total variation. The average grain yield of the genotypes was 2008.17 kg/ha. The highest and the lowest mean yield was obtained from SML-668 (2536.47 kg/ha) and SML-32 (1773.59 kg/ha) respectively. The AMMI bi-plot also depicted that, SML-668 and SML-32 were the high yielding and low yielding genotype, respectively. Similar to the AMMI bi-plot, the GGE bi-plot also confirmed that SML-668 was the winning genotype in most of the environments; whereas, SML-32 and local 2-sheraro, were the low yielding genotypes in some or all of the environments. E1, E2 and E6 are discriminating environments and declared as the most representative than E3, E4 and E5. Generally, SML-668 was the ideal genotype with higher mean yield and relatively good stability; Local-2 Sheraro was the moderately good yielding genotype and the most unstable genotype; Whereas, SML-32 was the poorly yielding and unstable genotype.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1729581ammi bi-plotmung beangenotype x environment interaction (gei)gge bi-plotstability
spellingShingle Fiseha Baraki
Zenawi Gebregergis
Yirga Belay
Muez Berhe
Haile Zibelo
Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia
Cogent Food & Agriculture
ammi bi-plot
mung bean
genotype x environment interaction (gei)
gge bi-plot
stability
title Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia
title_full Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia
title_fullStr Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia
title_short Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia
title_sort genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mung bean vigna radiata l wilczek genotypes in northern ethiopia
topic ammi bi-plot
mung bean
genotype x environment interaction (gei)
gge bi-plot
stability
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1729581
work_keys_str_mv AT fisehabaraki genotypexenvironmentinteractionandyieldstabilityanalysisofmungbeanvignaradiatalwilczekgenotypesinnorthernethiopia
AT zenawigebregergis genotypexenvironmentinteractionandyieldstabilityanalysisofmungbeanvignaradiatalwilczekgenotypesinnorthernethiopia
AT yirgabelay genotypexenvironmentinteractionandyieldstabilityanalysisofmungbeanvignaradiatalwilczekgenotypesinnorthernethiopia
AT muezberhe genotypexenvironmentinteractionandyieldstabilityanalysisofmungbeanvignaradiatalwilczekgenotypesinnorthernethiopia
AT hailezibelo genotypexenvironmentinteractionandyieldstabilityanalysisofmungbeanvignaradiatalwilczekgenotypesinnorthernethiopia