Is physical restraint unethical and illegal?: a qualitative analysis of Korean written judgments
Abstract Background Physical restraint (PR) is used to ensure the safety of care recipients. However, this causes an ethical dilemma between the autonomy and dignity of the recipients and the provision of effective treatment by health workers. This study aimed to analyze legal and ethical situations...
Main Authors: | Seung Gyeong Jang, Won Lee, Jeongmin Ha, Sungkyoung Choi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Nursing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01781-8 |
Similar Items
-
Moral Dilemmas Regarding Physical Restraints in Intensive Care Units: Understanding Autonomy, Beneficence, Non-Maleficence and Justice in the Use of Physical Restraints
by: Zhou J, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Analysis of closed medical litigation in urology
by: Su Hwan Shin, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Comparative Analysis of Anesthetic Legal Disputes between Older and Younger Patients Referred to the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists in 2009–2018
by: Sung-Ae Cho, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Frequency of Dental Complaints Filed in the Medical Council Organization of Three Selected Cities of Mazandaran Province
by: M Zamanzadeh, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Estimating costs of bedside assessment by a judge in each case of mechanical restraint in Germany after new legislation
by: Sophie Hirsch, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)