Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain

<h4>Aims</h4> A Markov model was adapted to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban. Each of these non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was compared with vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Escobar Cervantes, Julio Martí-Almor, Alejandro Isidoro Pérez Cabeza, Kevin Bowrin, Aleix Llorac Moix, Mar Genís Gironès, David Gasche, Aurélie Millier, Jean Tardu, Mondher Toumi, Jean-Baptiste Briere
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020681/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1817992060364390400
author Carlos Escobar Cervantes
Julio Martí-Almor
Alejandro Isidoro Pérez Cabeza
Kevin Bowrin
Aleix Llorac Moix
Mar Genís Gironès
David Gasche
Aurélie Millier
Jean Tardu
Mondher Toumi
Jean-Baptiste Briere
author_facet Carlos Escobar Cervantes
Julio Martí-Almor
Alejandro Isidoro Pérez Cabeza
Kevin Bowrin
Aleix Llorac Moix
Mar Genís Gironès
David Gasche
Aurélie Millier
Jean Tardu
Mondher Toumi
Jean-Baptiste Briere
author_sort Carlos Escobar Cervantes
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Aims</h4> A Markov model was adapted to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban. Each of these non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was compared with vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain. <h4>Methods</h4> All inputs were derived from real-world studies: baseline patient characteristics, clinical event rates, as well as persistence rates for the vitamin K antagonist treatment option. A meta-analysis of real-world studies provided treatment effect and persistence data for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, each compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy. The model considered 3-month cycles over a lifetime horizon. The model outcomes included different costs, quality-adjusted life years and life-years gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. <h4>Results</h4> When compared with vitamin K antagonist, rivaroxaban incurred incremental costs of €77 and resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life years of 0.08. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year was €952. For the same comparison, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for dabigatran was €4,612. Finally, compared with vitamin K antagonist, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for apixaban was €32,015. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case results. The probabilities to be cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist were 94%, 86% and 35%, respectively, for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €22,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, based on a cost-effectiveness study of the Spanish National Health System. <h4>Conclusion</h4> These results suggest that rivaroxaban and dabigatran are cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T01:21:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46da4a59a6c2409393f102d6268c6b32
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T01:21:35Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-46da4a59a6c2409393f102d6268c6b322022-12-22T02:20:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01174Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in SpainCarlos Escobar CervantesJulio Martí-AlmorAlejandro Isidoro Pérez CabezaKevin BowrinAleix Llorac MoixMar Genís GironèsDavid GascheAurélie MillierJean TarduMondher ToumiJean-Baptiste Briere<h4>Aims</h4> A Markov model was adapted to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban. Each of these non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was compared with vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain. <h4>Methods</h4> All inputs were derived from real-world studies: baseline patient characteristics, clinical event rates, as well as persistence rates for the vitamin K antagonist treatment option. A meta-analysis of real-world studies provided treatment effect and persistence data for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, each compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy. The model considered 3-month cycles over a lifetime horizon. The model outcomes included different costs, quality-adjusted life years and life-years gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. <h4>Results</h4> When compared with vitamin K antagonist, rivaroxaban incurred incremental costs of €77 and resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life years of 0.08. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year was €952. For the same comparison, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for dabigatran was €4,612. Finally, compared with vitamin K antagonist, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for apixaban was €32,015. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case results. The probabilities to be cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist were 94%, 86% and 35%, respectively, for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €22,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, based on a cost-effectiveness study of the Spanish National Health System. <h4>Conclusion</h4> These results suggest that rivaroxaban and dabigatran are cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020681/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Carlos Escobar Cervantes
Julio Martí-Almor
Alejandro Isidoro Pérez Cabeza
Kevin Bowrin
Aleix Llorac Moix
Mar Genís Gironès
David Gasche
Aurélie Millier
Jean Tardu
Mondher Toumi
Jean-Baptiste Briere
Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
PLoS ONE
title Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_full Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_fullStr Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_short Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain
title_sort real world cost effectiveness analysis of noacs versus vka for stroke prevention in spain
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020681/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosescobarcervantes realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT juliomartialmor realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT alejandroisidoroperezcabeza realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT kevinbowrin realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT aleixlloracmoix realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT margenisgirones realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT davidgasche realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT aureliemillier realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT jeantardu realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT mondhertoumi realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain
AT jeanbaptistebriere realworldcosteffectivenessanalysisofnoacsversusvkaforstrokepreventioninspain