The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence.
BACKGROUND:The beliefs we hold about stress play an important role in coping with stressors. Various theoretical frameworks of stress point to the efficacy of reframing stress-related information through brief reappraisal interventions in order to promote adaptive coping. PURPOSE:The goal of the cur...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212854 |
| _version_ | 1819128835127377920 |
|---|---|
| author | Jenny J W Liu Natalie Ein Julia Gervasio Kristin Vickers |
| author_facet | Jenny J W Liu Natalie Ein Julia Gervasio Kristin Vickers |
| author_sort | Jenny J W Liu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BACKGROUND:The beliefs we hold about stress play an important role in coping with stressors. Various theoretical frameworks of stress point to the efficacy of reframing stress-related information through brief reappraisal interventions in order to promote adaptive coping. PURPOSE:The goal of the current meta-analysis and systematic review is to substantiate the efficacy of reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity compared to control conditions. Differences in experimental methodologies (e.g., type of stressor used, timing of reappraisal intervention, and content of intervention instructions) will be examined to further delineate their effects on intervention outcomes. METHODS:The literature searches were conducted on May 16, 2018 using PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and PILOTS databases with no date restriction. The search terms included stress, reframing, reappraisal, mindset and reconceptualising. A total of 14 articles with 36 independent samples were included in the meta-analysis, while 22 articles with 46 independent samples were included in the systematic review. Random-effects model was used to test the null hypothesis using two-tailed significance testing. Fisher's Z value was reported for each corresponding test. Heterogeneity tests are reported via Cochran's Q-statistics. RESULTS:Findings from both the meta-analysis and systematic review revealed that overall, reappraisal interventions are effective in attenuating subjective responsivity to stress. Standard differences in means across groups are 0.429 (SE = 0.185, 95% CI = 0.067 to 0.791; z = 2.320, p = .020). However, reappraisal intervention groups did not outperform control groups on measures of physiological stress, with standard differences of -0.084 (SE = 0.135, 95% CI = -0.349 to 0.180; z = -0.627, p = .531). Moderator analysis revealed heterogeneous effects suggesting large variability in findings. CONCLUSIONS:On one hand, findings may suggest a promising avenue for the effective management of self-reported stress and optimization of stress responses. However, more research is needed to better elucidate the effects, if any, of reappraisal interventions on stress physiology. Implications for the use of reappraisal interventions on stress optimization are discussed in the context of theoretical frameworks and considerations for future studies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T08:34:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-46daaceb80eb452cacf405b43c3c6345 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T08:34:08Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-46daaceb80eb452cacf405b43c3c63452022-12-21T18:32:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01142e021285410.1371/journal.pone.0212854The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence.Jenny J W LiuNatalie EinJulia GervasioKristin VickersBACKGROUND:The beliefs we hold about stress play an important role in coping with stressors. Various theoretical frameworks of stress point to the efficacy of reframing stress-related information through brief reappraisal interventions in order to promote adaptive coping. PURPOSE:The goal of the current meta-analysis and systematic review is to substantiate the efficacy of reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity compared to control conditions. Differences in experimental methodologies (e.g., type of stressor used, timing of reappraisal intervention, and content of intervention instructions) will be examined to further delineate their effects on intervention outcomes. METHODS:The literature searches were conducted on May 16, 2018 using PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and PILOTS databases with no date restriction. The search terms included stress, reframing, reappraisal, mindset and reconceptualising. A total of 14 articles with 36 independent samples were included in the meta-analysis, while 22 articles with 46 independent samples were included in the systematic review. Random-effects model was used to test the null hypothesis using two-tailed significance testing. Fisher's Z value was reported for each corresponding test. Heterogeneity tests are reported via Cochran's Q-statistics. RESULTS:Findings from both the meta-analysis and systematic review revealed that overall, reappraisal interventions are effective in attenuating subjective responsivity to stress. Standard differences in means across groups are 0.429 (SE = 0.185, 95% CI = 0.067 to 0.791; z = 2.320, p = .020). However, reappraisal intervention groups did not outperform control groups on measures of physiological stress, with standard differences of -0.084 (SE = 0.135, 95% CI = -0.349 to 0.180; z = -0.627, p = .531). Moderator analysis revealed heterogeneous effects suggesting large variability in findings. CONCLUSIONS:On one hand, findings may suggest a promising avenue for the effective management of self-reported stress and optimization of stress responses. However, more research is needed to better elucidate the effects, if any, of reappraisal interventions on stress physiology. Implications for the use of reappraisal interventions on stress optimization are discussed in the context of theoretical frameworks and considerations for future studies.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212854 |
| spellingShingle | Jenny J W Liu Natalie Ein Julia Gervasio Kristin Vickers The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence. PLoS ONE |
| title | The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence. |
| title_full | The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence. |
| title_fullStr | The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence. |
| title_short | The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence. |
| title_sort | efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity a meta analysis and systematic review of existing evidence |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212854 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jennyjwliu theefficacyofstressreappraisalinterventionsonstressresponsivityametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofexistingevidence AT natalieein theefficacyofstressreappraisalinterventionsonstressresponsivityametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofexistingevidence AT juliagervasio theefficacyofstressreappraisalinterventionsonstressresponsivityametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofexistingevidence AT kristinvickers theefficacyofstressreappraisalinterventionsonstressresponsivityametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofexistingevidence AT jennyjwliu efficacyofstressreappraisalinterventionsonstressresponsivityametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofexistingevidence AT natalieein efficacyofstressreappraisalinterventionsonstressresponsivityametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofexistingevidence AT juliagervasio efficacyofstressreappraisalinterventionsonstressresponsivityametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofexistingevidence AT kristinvickers efficacyofstressreappraisalinterventionsonstressresponsivityametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofexistingevidence |