Comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Objective To compare the effects on facial soft tissues produced by maxillary expansion generated by rapid maxillary expansion (RME) versus slow maxillary expansion (SME). Materials and methods Patients in the mixed dentition were included with a transverse discrepancy between the two arche...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matilde Marino Merlo, Bernardo Quiroga Souki, Michele Nieri, Agnese Bonanno, Veronica Giuntini, James A. McNamara Jr., Lorenzo Franchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-01-01
Series:Progress in Orthodontics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00498-9
_version_ 1827388076450643968
author Matilde Marino Merlo
Bernardo Quiroga Souki
Michele Nieri
Agnese Bonanno
Veronica Giuntini
James A. McNamara Jr.
Lorenzo Franchi
author_facet Matilde Marino Merlo
Bernardo Quiroga Souki
Michele Nieri
Agnese Bonanno
Veronica Giuntini
James A. McNamara Jr.
Lorenzo Franchi
author_sort Matilde Marino Merlo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To compare the effects on facial soft tissues produced by maxillary expansion generated by rapid maxillary expansion (RME) versus slow maxillary expansion (SME). Materials and methods Patients in the mixed dentition were included with a transverse discrepancy between the two arches of at least 3 mm. A conventional RME screw was compared to a new expansion screw (Leaf expander) designed to produce SME. Both screws were incorporated in a fixed expander. The primary outcome was the difference of the facial tissue changes in the nasal area measured on facial 3D images captured immediately before application of the expander (T0) and after one year of retention, immediately after the expander removal (T1). Secondary outcomes were soft tissue changes of other facial regions (mouth, lips, and chin). Analysis of covariance was used for statistical analysis. Results Fourteen patients were allocated to the RME group, and 14 patients were allocated to the SME group. There were no dropouts. Nasal width change showed a difference between the two groups (1.3 mm greater in the RME group, 95% CI from 0.4 to 2.2, P = 0.005). Also, intercanthal width showed a difference between treatments (0.7 mm greater in the RME group, 95% CI from 0.0 to 1.3, P = 0.044). Nasal columella width, mouth width, nasal tip angle, upper lip angle, and lower lip angle did not show any statistically significant differences. The Y-axis (anterior–posterior) components of the nasal landmark showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (0.5 mm of forward displacement greater in the RME group, 95% CI from 0.0 to 1.2, P = 0.040). Also, Z-axis (superior-inferior) components of the lower lip landmark was statistically significant (0.9 mm of downward displacement in favor of the RME group, 95% CI from 0.1 to 1.7, P = 0.027). All the other comparisons of the three-dimensional assessments were not statistically significant. Conclusions RME produced significant facial soft tissue changes when compared to SME. RME induced greater increases in both nasal and intercanthal widths (1.3 mm and 0.7 mm, respectively). These findings, though statistically significant, probably are not clinically relevant. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN18263886. Registered 8 November 2016, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18263886?q=Franchi&filters=&sort=&offset=2&totalResults=2&page=1&pageSize=10
first_indexed 2024-03-08T16:12:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46de6b28e047447e88049c635e159a6e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-1042
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T16:12:12Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Progress in Orthodontics
spelling doaj.art-46de6b28e047447e88049c635e159a6e2024-01-07T12:49:19ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Orthodontics2196-10422024-01-012511910.1186/s40510-023-00498-9Comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry: a randomized clinical trialMatilde Marino Merlo0Bernardo Quiroga Souki1Michele Nieri2Agnese Bonanno3Veronica Giuntini4James A. McNamara Jr.5Lorenzo Franchi6Graduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, The University of FlorenceGraduate Orthodontic Program, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas GeraisDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Orthodontics, The University of FlorenceGraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, The University of FlorenceGraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, The University of FlorenceThomas M. and Doris Graber Endowed Professor of Dentistry Emeritus, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, The University of MichiganGraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, The University of FlorenceAbstract Objective To compare the effects on facial soft tissues produced by maxillary expansion generated by rapid maxillary expansion (RME) versus slow maxillary expansion (SME). Materials and methods Patients in the mixed dentition were included with a transverse discrepancy between the two arches of at least 3 mm. A conventional RME screw was compared to a new expansion screw (Leaf expander) designed to produce SME. Both screws were incorporated in a fixed expander. The primary outcome was the difference of the facial tissue changes in the nasal area measured on facial 3D images captured immediately before application of the expander (T0) and after one year of retention, immediately after the expander removal (T1). Secondary outcomes were soft tissue changes of other facial regions (mouth, lips, and chin). Analysis of covariance was used for statistical analysis. Results Fourteen patients were allocated to the RME group, and 14 patients were allocated to the SME group. There were no dropouts. Nasal width change showed a difference between the two groups (1.3 mm greater in the RME group, 95% CI from 0.4 to 2.2, P = 0.005). Also, intercanthal width showed a difference between treatments (0.7 mm greater in the RME group, 95% CI from 0.0 to 1.3, P = 0.044). Nasal columella width, mouth width, nasal tip angle, upper lip angle, and lower lip angle did not show any statistically significant differences. The Y-axis (anterior–posterior) components of the nasal landmark showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (0.5 mm of forward displacement greater in the RME group, 95% CI from 0.0 to 1.2, P = 0.040). Also, Z-axis (superior-inferior) components of the lower lip landmark was statistically significant (0.9 mm of downward displacement in favor of the RME group, 95% CI from 0.1 to 1.7, P = 0.027). All the other comparisons of the three-dimensional assessments were not statistically significant. Conclusions RME produced significant facial soft tissue changes when compared to SME. RME induced greater increases in both nasal and intercanthal widths (1.3 mm and 0.7 mm, respectively). These findings, though statistically significant, probably are not clinically relevant. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN18263886. Registered 8 November 2016, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18263886?q=Franchi&filters=&sort=&offset=2&totalResults=2&page=1&pageSize=10https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00498-9
spellingShingle Matilde Marino Merlo
Bernardo Quiroga Souki
Michele Nieri
Agnese Bonanno
Veronica Giuntini
James A. McNamara Jr.
Lorenzo Franchi
Comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry: a randomized clinical trial
Progress in Orthodontics
title Comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry a randomized clinical trial
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00498-9
work_keys_str_mv AT matildemarinomerlo comparisonoftheeffectsonfacialsofttissuesproducedbyrapidandslowmaxillaryexpansionusingstereophotogrammetryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bernardoquirogasouki comparisonoftheeffectsonfacialsofttissuesproducedbyrapidandslowmaxillaryexpansionusingstereophotogrammetryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT michelenieri comparisonoftheeffectsonfacialsofttissuesproducedbyrapidandslowmaxillaryexpansionusingstereophotogrammetryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT agnesebonanno comparisonoftheeffectsonfacialsofttissuesproducedbyrapidandslowmaxillaryexpansionusingstereophotogrammetryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT veronicagiuntini comparisonoftheeffectsonfacialsofttissuesproducedbyrapidandslowmaxillaryexpansionusingstereophotogrammetryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jamesamcnamarajr comparisonoftheeffectsonfacialsofttissuesproducedbyrapidandslowmaxillaryexpansionusingstereophotogrammetryarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lorenzofranchi comparisonoftheeffectsonfacialsofttissuesproducedbyrapidandslowmaxillaryexpansionusingstereophotogrammetryarandomizedclinicaltrial