Survival differences between patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed advanced non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements

Abstract Background We aimed to examine whether patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed stage IIIB–IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations have different prognoses. Methods This retrospective study anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Byeong-Chan Oh, Ae-Ryeo Cho, Jin Hyun Nam, So-Young Yang, Min Ji Kim, Sun-Hong Kwon, Eui-Kyung Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-05-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10950-y
_version_ 1827933317048041472
author Byeong-Chan Oh
Ae-Ryeo Cho
Jin Hyun Nam
So-Young Yang
Min Ji Kim
Sun-Hong Kwon
Eui-Kyung Lee
author_facet Byeong-Chan Oh
Ae-Ryeo Cho
Jin Hyun Nam
So-Young Yang
Min Ji Kim
Sun-Hong Kwon
Eui-Kyung Lee
author_sort Byeong-Chan Oh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background We aimed to examine whether patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed stage IIIB–IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations have different prognoses. Methods This retrospective study analyzed the Health Insurance Review and Assessment claims data in South Korea from 2013 to 2020. Patients with stage IIIB–IV NSCLC without EGFR or ALK mutations who received first-line palliative therapy between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Overall survival (OS), time to first subsequent therapy (TFST), and time to second subsequent therapy (TSST) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to reveal the impact of de novo versus relapsed/progressed disease on OS. Treatment patterns, including treatment sequence, top five most frequent regimens, and time to treatment discontinuation, were described in both groups. Results Of 14,505 patients, 12,811 (88.3%) were de novo, and 1,694 (11.7%) were relapsed/progressed. The median OS in the de novo group was 11.0 versus 11.5 months in the relapsed/progressed group (P = 0.002). The ongoing treatment probability was higher in relapsed/progressed patients than in de novo patients from 6.4 months since the initiation of first-line treatment (P < 0.001). Median TSST was shorter in the de novo group than in the relapsed/progressed group (9.5 vs. 9.9 months, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, de novo disease was associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.14). The overall treatment patterns for de novo and relapsed/progressed patients were similar. Conclusions De novo patients had poorer OS and TSST after the initiation of palliative therapy than relapsed/progressed patients. These findings suggest that the stage of the disease at the time of initial diagnosis should be considered in observational studies and clinical trials as a prognostic factor.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:23:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46ec22a37af34bc186328d888302f90f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:23:07Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-46ec22a37af34bc186328d888302f90f2023-06-04T11:31:22ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072023-05-0123111210.1186/s12885-023-10950-ySurvival differences between patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed advanced non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangementsByeong-Chan Oh0Ae-Ryeo Cho1Jin Hyun Nam2So-Young Yang3Min Ji Kim4Sun-Hong Kwon5Eui-Kyung Lee6School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan UniversitySchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan UniversityDivision of Big Data Science, Korea University Sejong CampusAmgen Korea LimitedAmgen Korea LimitedSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan UniversitySchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan UniversityAbstract Background We aimed to examine whether patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed stage IIIB–IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations have different prognoses. Methods This retrospective study analyzed the Health Insurance Review and Assessment claims data in South Korea from 2013 to 2020. Patients with stage IIIB–IV NSCLC without EGFR or ALK mutations who received first-line palliative therapy between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Overall survival (OS), time to first subsequent therapy (TFST), and time to second subsequent therapy (TSST) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to reveal the impact of de novo versus relapsed/progressed disease on OS. Treatment patterns, including treatment sequence, top five most frequent regimens, and time to treatment discontinuation, were described in both groups. Results Of 14,505 patients, 12,811 (88.3%) were de novo, and 1,694 (11.7%) were relapsed/progressed. The median OS in the de novo group was 11.0 versus 11.5 months in the relapsed/progressed group (P = 0.002). The ongoing treatment probability was higher in relapsed/progressed patients than in de novo patients from 6.4 months since the initiation of first-line treatment (P < 0.001). Median TSST was shorter in the de novo group than in the relapsed/progressed group (9.5 vs. 9.9 months, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, de novo disease was associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.14). The overall treatment patterns for de novo and relapsed/progressed patients were similar. Conclusions De novo patients had poorer OS and TSST after the initiation of palliative therapy than relapsed/progressed patients. These findings suggest that the stage of the disease at the time of initial diagnosis should be considered in observational studies and clinical trials as a prognostic factor.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10950-yNon-small cell lung cancerOverall survivalTreatment patternDe novoRecurrenceReal-world data
spellingShingle Byeong-Chan Oh
Ae-Ryeo Cho
Jin Hyun Nam
So-Young Yang
Min Ji Kim
Sun-Hong Kwon
Eui-Kyung Lee
Survival differences between patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed advanced non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements
BMC Cancer
Non-small cell lung cancer
Overall survival
Treatment pattern
De novo
Recurrence
Real-world data
title Survival differences between patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed advanced non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements
title_full Survival differences between patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed advanced non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements
title_fullStr Survival differences between patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed advanced non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements
title_full_unstemmed Survival differences between patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed advanced non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements
title_short Survival differences between patients with de novo and relapsed/progressed advanced non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements
title_sort survival differences between patients with de novo and relapsed progressed advanced non small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements
topic Non-small cell lung cancer
Overall survival
Treatment pattern
De novo
Recurrence
Real-world data
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10950-y
work_keys_str_mv AT byeongchanoh survivaldifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrelapsedprogressedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithoutepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsoranaplasticlymphomakinaserearrangements
AT aeryeocho survivaldifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrelapsedprogressedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithoutepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsoranaplasticlymphomakinaserearrangements
AT jinhyunnam survivaldifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrelapsedprogressedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithoutepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsoranaplasticlymphomakinaserearrangements
AT soyoungyang survivaldifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrelapsedprogressedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithoutepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsoranaplasticlymphomakinaserearrangements
AT minjikim survivaldifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrelapsedprogressedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithoutepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsoranaplasticlymphomakinaserearrangements
AT sunhongkwon survivaldifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrelapsedprogressedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithoutepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsoranaplasticlymphomakinaserearrangements
AT euikyunglee survivaldifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrelapsedprogressedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithoutepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsoranaplasticlymphomakinaserearrangements