Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR. Methods A systematic literature...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Partha Pal, Mohan Ramchandani, Pradev Inavolu, Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy, Manu Tandan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-09-01
Series:Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1755304
_version_ 1797995019028660224
author Partha Pal
Mohan Ramchandani
Pradev Inavolu
Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy
Manu Tandan
author_facet Partha Pal
Mohan Ramchandani
Pradev Inavolu
Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy
Manu Tandan
author_sort Partha Pal
collection DOAJ
description Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022. Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery. Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T09:54:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46f29c65d6a543d8b5674f42699e2f38
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0976-5042
0976-5050
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T09:54:51Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
spelling doaj.art-46f29c65d6a543d8b5674f42699e2f382022-12-22T04:30:38ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Journal of Digestive Endoscopy0976-50420976-50502022-09-01130315216910.1055/s-0042-1755304Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic ReviewPartha Pal0Mohan Ramchandani1Pradev Inavolu2Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy3Manu Tandan4Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, IndiaDepartment of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, IndiaDepartment of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, IndiaDepartment of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, IndiaDepartment of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, IndiaBackground Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022. Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery. Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1755304endoscopic full thickness resectionfull thickness resection devicesub-epithelial lesionsover the scope clips
spellingShingle Partha Pal
Mohan Ramchandani
Pradev Inavolu
Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy
Manu Tandan
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
endoscopic full thickness resection
full thickness resection device
sub-epithelial lesions
over the scope clips
title Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review
title_full Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review
title_short Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review
title_sort endoscopic full thickness resection a systematic review
topic endoscopic full thickness resection
full thickness resection device
sub-epithelial lesions
over the scope clips
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1755304
work_keys_str_mv AT parthapal endoscopicfullthicknessresectionasystematicreview
AT mohanramchandani endoscopicfullthicknessresectionasystematicreview
AT pradevinavolu endoscopicfullthicknessresectionasystematicreview
AT duvvurunageshwarreddy endoscopicfullthicknessresectionasystematicreview
AT manutandan endoscopicfullthicknessresectionasystematicreview