Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy

BackgroundPublic policy approaches to funding paediatric medicines in advanced health systems remain understudied. In particular, the ethical and social values dimensions of health technology assessment (HTA) and drug coverage decisions for children have received almost no attention in research or p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Avram E. Denburg, Mita Giacomini, Wendy Ungar, Julia Abelson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2022-03-01
Series:International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3889_f67b13175199d5bd95cd7d506ad5974d.pdf
_version_ 1811158780508897280
author Avram E. Denburg
Mita Giacomini
Wendy Ungar
Julia Abelson
author_facet Avram E. Denburg
Mita Giacomini
Wendy Ungar
Julia Abelson
author_sort Avram E. Denburg
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPublic policy approaches to funding paediatric medicines in advanced health systems remain understudied. In particular, the ethical and social values dimensions of health technology assessment (HTA) and drug coverage decisions for children have received almost no attention in research or policy. MethodsTo elicit and understand the social values that influence decision-making for public funding of paediatric drugs, we undertook a series of in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a stratified purposive sample (n = 22) of stakeholders involved with or affected by drug funding decisions for children at the provincial (Ontario) and national levels in Canada. Constructivist grounded theory methodology guided data collection and thematic analysis. ResultsOur study provides empirical evidence about the unique ethical and social values dimensions of HTA for children, and describes a novel social values typology for paediatric drug policy decision-making. Three principal categories of values emerged from stakeholder reflections on HTA and drug policy-making for children: procedural values, structural values, and sociocultural values. Key findings include the importance of attention to the procedural legitimacy of HTA for children, with emphasis on the inclusion of child health voices in processes of technology appraisal and policy uptake; a role for HTA institutions to consider the equity impacts of technologies, both in setting review priorities and in assessing the value of technologies for public coverage; and the potential benefits of a distinct national framework to guide drug policy for children. ConclusionCurrent approaches to HTA are not well designed for the realities of child health and illness, nor the societal priorities regarding children that our study identified. This research generates new knowledge to inform decision-making on paediatric drugs by HTA institutions and government payers in Canada and other publicly-funded health systems, through insights into the relevant social values for child drug funding decisions from varied stakeholder groups.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:28:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-46f407d6e1484ae9b33e294ea4964d7c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-5939
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:28:55Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal of Health Policy and Management
spelling doaj.art-46f407d6e1484ae9b33e294ea4964d7c2023-03-07T09:10:09ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392022-03-0111337438210.34172/ijhpm.2020.1443889Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug PolicyAvram E. Denburg0Mita Giacomini1Wendy Ungar2Julia Abelson3Division of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaChild Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaBackgroundPublic policy approaches to funding paediatric medicines in advanced health systems remain understudied. In particular, the ethical and social values dimensions of health technology assessment (HTA) and drug coverage decisions for children have received almost no attention in research or policy. MethodsTo elicit and understand the social values that influence decision-making for public funding of paediatric drugs, we undertook a series of in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a stratified purposive sample (n = 22) of stakeholders involved with or affected by drug funding decisions for children at the provincial (Ontario) and national levels in Canada. Constructivist grounded theory methodology guided data collection and thematic analysis. ResultsOur study provides empirical evidence about the unique ethical and social values dimensions of HTA for children, and describes a novel social values typology for paediatric drug policy decision-making. Three principal categories of values emerged from stakeholder reflections on HTA and drug policy-making for children: procedural values, structural values, and sociocultural values. Key findings include the importance of attention to the procedural legitimacy of HTA for children, with emphasis on the inclusion of child health voices in processes of technology appraisal and policy uptake; a role for HTA institutions to consider the equity impacts of technologies, both in setting review priorities and in assessing the value of technologies for public coverage; and the potential benefits of a distinct national framework to guide drug policy for children. ConclusionCurrent approaches to HTA are not well designed for the realities of child health and illness, nor the societal priorities regarding children that our study identified. This research generates new knowledge to inform decision-making on paediatric drugs by HTA institutions and government payers in Canada and other publicly-funded health systems, through insights into the relevant social values for child drug funding decisions from varied stakeholder groups.https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3889_f67b13175199d5bd95cd7d506ad5974d.pdfcanadachildrenhealth technology assessmentpublic valuespriority settingdrug coverage
spellingShingle Avram E. Denburg
Mita Giacomini
Wendy Ungar
Julia Abelson
Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
canada
children
health technology assessment
public values
priority setting
drug coverage
title Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy
title_full Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy
title_fullStr Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy
title_full_unstemmed Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy
title_short Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy
title_sort ethical and social values for paediatric health technology assessment and drug policy
topic canada
children
health technology assessment
public values
priority setting
drug coverage
url https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3889_f67b13175199d5bd95cd7d506ad5974d.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT avramedenburg ethicalandsocialvaluesforpaediatrichealthtechnologyassessmentanddrugpolicy
AT mitagiacomini ethicalandsocialvaluesforpaediatrichealthtechnologyassessmentanddrugpolicy
AT wendyungar ethicalandsocialvaluesforpaediatrichealthtechnologyassessmentanddrugpolicy
AT juliaabelson ethicalandsocialvaluesforpaediatrichealthtechnologyassessmentanddrugpolicy