Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Full-Thickness Cartilage Palisades in Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty for Large/Subtotal Perforations

Introduction: To demonstrate surgical techniques and to compare the anatomical and functional outcomes between temporalis fascia and cartilage palisade grafting in type-I underlay tympanoplasty in patients with large/subtotal perforation.Materials and Methods:Temporalis fascia and cartilage palisade...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pradeep Pradhan, Abhimanyu Anant, Vellore - Pattabhiram Venkatachalam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2017-03-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijorl.mums.ac.ir/article_8298_48efd10bf9f334cc2da8cea46026d698.pdf
_version_ 1819261505598652416
author Pradeep Pradhan
Abhimanyu Anant
Vellore - Pattabhiram Venkatachalam
author_facet Pradeep Pradhan
Abhimanyu Anant
Vellore - Pattabhiram Venkatachalam
author_sort Pradeep Pradhan
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: To demonstrate surgical techniques and to compare the anatomical and functional outcomes between temporalis fascia and cartilage palisade grafting in type-I underlay tympanoplasty in patients with large/subtotal perforation.Materials and Methods:Temporalis fascia and cartilage palisade grafting were conducted in Group A and Group B, respectively, each containing 30 patients with large/subtotal perforations. Pure tone audiogram (PTA) and speech reception thresholds (SRT) were performed preoperatively and at each postoperative visit; i.e. at the end of Month 1,3,6, and 24. A 10-dB closure of air bone gap (ABG) and a 10-dB improvement in SRT were considered significant. Results:The graft uptake rates were 80% and 96.7% in Group A and Group B, respectively, at the end of 24 months. In total, 90% of Group A and 88% in Group B had significant improvement in hearing (ABG ≥10 dB). The mean improvement in SRT in the fascia and cartilage groups was 10 dB and 9 dB, respectively. Seventy-five percent of patients in Group A and 60% of patients in Group B had a significant gain in SRT. Conclusion:Although both temporalis fascia and cartilage palisades can effectively be used for tympanic membrane (TM) grafting in difficult perforations, the latter is considered to be the better autograft, not only because of superior graft uptake but also because it results in a comparable hearing outcome.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T19:42:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-47002635645d4267aca6d60da7c45c8f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-7251
2251-726X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T19:42:52Z
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
spelling doaj.art-47002635645d4267aca6d60da7c45c8f2022-12-21T17:33:37ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology2251-72512251-726X2017-03-01292636810.22038/ijorl.2017.18979.16378298Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Full-Thickness Cartilage Palisades in Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty for Large/Subtotal PerforationsPradeep Pradhan0Abhimanyu Anant1Vellore - Pattabhiram Venkatachalam2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, IndiaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Safdarjung Hospital & Vardhmann Mahavir Medical College, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Safdarjung Hospital & Vardhmann Mahavir Medical College, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.Introduction: To demonstrate surgical techniques and to compare the anatomical and functional outcomes between temporalis fascia and cartilage palisade grafting in type-I underlay tympanoplasty in patients with large/subtotal perforation.Materials and Methods:Temporalis fascia and cartilage palisade grafting were conducted in Group A and Group B, respectively, each containing 30 patients with large/subtotal perforations. Pure tone audiogram (PTA) and speech reception thresholds (SRT) were performed preoperatively and at each postoperative visit; i.e. at the end of Month 1,3,6, and 24. A 10-dB closure of air bone gap (ABG) and a 10-dB improvement in SRT were considered significant. Results:The graft uptake rates were 80% and 96.7% in Group A and Group B, respectively, at the end of 24 months. In total, 90% of Group A and 88% in Group B had significant improvement in hearing (ABG ≥10 dB). The mean improvement in SRT in the fascia and cartilage groups was 10 dB and 9 dB, respectively. Seventy-five percent of patients in Group A and 60% of patients in Group B had a significant gain in SRT. Conclusion:Although both temporalis fascia and cartilage palisades can effectively be used for tympanic membrane (TM) grafting in difficult perforations, the latter is considered to be the better autograft, not only because of superior graft uptake but also because it results in a comparable hearing outcome.http://ijorl.mums.ac.ir/article_8298_48efd10bf9f334cc2da8cea46026d698.pdfCartilageTemporalis fasciaTympanoplasty
spellingShingle Pradeep Pradhan
Abhimanyu Anant
Vellore - Pattabhiram Venkatachalam
Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Full-Thickness Cartilage Palisades in Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty for Large/Subtotal Perforations
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Cartilage
Temporalis fascia
Tympanoplasty
title Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Full-Thickness Cartilage Palisades in Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty for Large/Subtotal Perforations
title_full Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Full-Thickness Cartilage Palisades in Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty for Large/Subtotal Perforations
title_fullStr Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Full-Thickness Cartilage Palisades in Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty for Large/Subtotal Perforations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Full-Thickness Cartilage Palisades in Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty for Large/Subtotal Perforations
title_short Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Full-Thickness Cartilage Palisades in Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty for Large/Subtotal Perforations
title_sort comparison of temporalis fascia and full thickness cartilage palisades in type i underlay tympanoplasty for large subtotal perforations
topic Cartilage
Temporalis fascia
Tympanoplasty
url http://ijorl.mums.ac.ir/article_8298_48efd10bf9f334cc2da8cea46026d698.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pradeeppradhan comparisonoftemporalisfasciaandfullthicknesscartilagepalisadesintypeiunderlaytympanoplastyforlargesubtotalperforations
AT abhimanyuanant comparisonoftemporalisfasciaandfullthicknesscartilagepalisadesintypeiunderlaytympanoplastyforlargesubtotalperforations
AT vellorepattabhiramvenkatachalam comparisonoftemporalisfasciaandfullthicknesscartilagepalisadesintypeiunderlaytympanoplastyforlargesubtotalperforations