Subaxillary Replacement Flap Compared with the Round Block Displacement Technique in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Functional Outcomes of a Feasible One Stage Reconstruction

Background: For selected women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC), partial reconstructive techniques involve displacement or replacement procedures to improve cosmesis without compromising oncological safety. This study aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the round block (RB) compared with the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paolo Orsaria, Antonella Grasso, Georgeta Soponaru, Francesca Carnevale, Virginia Scorsone, Edy Ippolito, Francesco Pantano, Matteo Sammarra, Claudia Piccolo, Michele Altomare, Giuseppe Perrone, Vittorio Altomare
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Current Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/29/12/736
_version_ 1797460727856889856
author Paolo Orsaria
Antonella Grasso
Georgeta Soponaru
Francesca Carnevale
Virginia Scorsone
Edy Ippolito
Francesco Pantano
Matteo Sammarra
Claudia Piccolo
Michele Altomare
Giuseppe Perrone
Vittorio Altomare
author_facet Paolo Orsaria
Antonella Grasso
Georgeta Soponaru
Francesca Carnevale
Virginia Scorsone
Edy Ippolito
Francesco Pantano
Matteo Sammarra
Claudia Piccolo
Michele Altomare
Giuseppe Perrone
Vittorio Altomare
author_sort Paolo Orsaria
collection DOAJ
description Background: For selected women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC), partial reconstructive techniques involve displacement or replacement procedures to improve cosmesis without compromising oncological safety. This study aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the round block (RB) compared with the subaxillary flap (SF) technique for patients with upper outer tumor. Patients and Methods: Thirty-three patients treated with oncoplastic conserving surgery (15 RB and 18 SF) were enrolled in this retrospective study. After carrying out a comparison of baseline characteristics, all cases were recruited for postoperative evaluation of oncological and cosmetic parameters. Moreover, we investigated several scoring combinations to check whether they could discriminate surgeon and patient satisfaction according to different functional results. Results: Median age (<i>p</i> < 0.05), average tumor size (<i>p</i> > 0.05), estimated resection volume (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and nodal involvement (<i>p</i> > 0.05) were slightly higher in the SF group. A greater frequency of DCIS (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the RB series correlated with reintervention for positive margins (<i>p</i> > 0.001). At a mean follow-up of 19 months, no locoregional recurrences were recorded and early and late complications were comparable (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The overall satisfaction with cosmesis was characterized by similar proportions of good results (<i>p</i> > 0.05), with some details more related to each procedure. Conclusion: The proposed techniques represent effective solutions for reshaping that follows upper outer wide excision, achieving comparable complication rates, low reinterventions, and good aesthetic results in relation to technical and social functioning evaluations. However, it is crucial to establish a careful patient selection in order to manage correct surgical planning while predicting any potential sequelae or complication.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:09:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-470bddd13d3f4cb2adfac7a81a25b04a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1198-0052
1718-7729
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:09:11Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Current Oncology
spelling doaj.art-470bddd13d3f4cb2adfac7a81a25b04a2023-11-24T14:12:39ZengMDPI AGCurrent Oncology1198-00521718-77292022-11-0129129377939010.3390/curroncol29120736Subaxillary Replacement Flap Compared with the Round Block Displacement Technique in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Functional Outcomes of a Feasible One Stage ReconstructionPaolo Orsaria0Antonella Grasso1Georgeta Soponaru2Francesca Carnevale3Virginia Scorsone4Edy Ippolito5Francesco Pantano6Matteo Sammarra7Claudia Piccolo8Michele Altomare9Giuseppe Perrone10Vittorio Altomare11Department of Breast Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Trauma and Acute Care, Metropolitano Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00139 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00159 Rome, ItalyBackground: For selected women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC), partial reconstructive techniques involve displacement or replacement procedures to improve cosmesis without compromising oncological safety. This study aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the round block (RB) compared with the subaxillary flap (SF) technique for patients with upper outer tumor. Patients and Methods: Thirty-three patients treated with oncoplastic conserving surgery (15 RB and 18 SF) were enrolled in this retrospective study. After carrying out a comparison of baseline characteristics, all cases were recruited for postoperative evaluation of oncological and cosmetic parameters. Moreover, we investigated several scoring combinations to check whether they could discriminate surgeon and patient satisfaction according to different functional results. Results: Median age (<i>p</i> < 0.05), average tumor size (<i>p</i> > 0.05), estimated resection volume (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and nodal involvement (<i>p</i> > 0.05) were slightly higher in the SF group. A greater frequency of DCIS (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the RB series correlated with reintervention for positive margins (<i>p</i> > 0.001). At a mean follow-up of 19 months, no locoregional recurrences were recorded and early and late complications were comparable (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The overall satisfaction with cosmesis was characterized by similar proportions of good results (<i>p</i> > 0.05), with some details more related to each procedure. Conclusion: The proposed techniques represent effective solutions for reshaping that follows upper outer wide excision, achieving comparable complication rates, low reinterventions, and good aesthetic results in relation to technical and social functioning evaluations. However, it is crucial to establish a careful patient selection in order to manage correct surgical planning while predicting any potential sequelae or complication.https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/29/12/736breast canceroncoplastic surgerydisplacementreplacementcosmetic outcomes
spellingShingle Paolo Orsaria
Antonella Grasso
Georgeta Soponaru
Francesca Carnevale
Virginia Scorsone
Edy Ippolito
Francesco Pantano
Matteo Sammarra
Claudia Piccolo
Michele Altomare
Giuseppe Perrone
Vittorio Altomare
Subaxillary Replacement Flap Compared with the Round Block Displacement Technique in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Functional Outcomes of a Feasible One Stage Reconstruction
Current Oncology
breast cancer
oncoplastic surgery
displacement
replacement
cosmetic outcomes
title Subaxillary Replacement Flap Compared with the Round Block Displacement Technique in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Functional Outcomes of a Feasible One Stage Reconstruction
title_full Subaxillary Replacement Flap Compared with the Round Block Displacement Technique in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Functional Outcomes of a Feasible One Stage Reconstruction
title_fullStr Subaxillary Replacement Flap Compared with the Round Block Displacement Technique in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Functional Outcomes of a Feasible One Stage Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Subaxillary Replacement Flap Compared with the Round Block Displacement Technique in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Functional Outcomes of a Feasible One Stage Reconstruction
title_short Subaxillary Replacement Flap Compared with the Round Block Displacement Technique in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Functional Outcomes of a Feasible One Stage Reconstruction
title_sort subaxillary replacement flap compared with the round block displacement technique in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery functional outcomes of a feasible one stage reconstruction
topic breast cancer
oncoplastic surgery
displacement
replacement
cosmetic outcomes
url https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/29/12/736
work_keys_str_mv AT paoloorsaria subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT antonellagrasso subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT georgetasoponaru subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT francescacarnevale subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT virginiascorsone subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT edyippolito subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT francescopantano subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT matteosammarra subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT claudiapiccolo subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT michelealtomare subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT giuseppeperrone subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction
AT vittorioaltomare subaxillaryreplacementflapcomparedwiththeroundblockdisplacementtechniqueinoncoplasticbreastconservingsurgeryfunctionaloutcomesofafeasibleonestagereconstruction