Economic Structure and Problems of Trout Enterprises: A Case of Fethiye

In this study, economic structure and problems of trout enterprise were analysed in Fethiye district. It was aimed to determine the input of enterprises engaged in aquaculture at the Fethiye district, calculation of the economic situation, investigation of the market situation and determine problems...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hicran Ekmekci, Mevlüt Gül
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP) 2017-01-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/806
_version_ 1797919709185703936
author Hicran Ekmekci
Mevlüt Gül
author_facet Hicran Ekmekci
Mevlüt Gül
author_sort Hicran Ekmekci
collection DOAJ
description In this study, economic structure and problems of trout enterprise were analysed in Fethiye district. It was aimed to determine the input of enterprises engaged in aquaculture at the Fethiye district, calculation of the economic situation, investigation of the market situation and determine problems. In addition possible solutions were tried to be to problems. In the district, it was interviewed with 17 trout enterprises. Data were collected with interviewing face to face by questionnaires. These data was analysed by MS Excel and SPSS programmes. 52.9% of the enterprises were established in the foothill, 35.3% were in open field and 11.8% were established in between valleys. 58.8% of these enterprises were individual enterprises, %17.6 was simple partnership and 23.5% were commercial partnership. The most shares in the active capital were constituted working capital with a rate of 70.3% whereas the share of landlord’s capital was 29.7%. The share of own capital in passive capital was 93.9% and the usage of foreign capital was low (6.1%). The share of variable cost was 83.6% while fixed cost was 16.4% in the total production cost. The main problem of enterprises was the rise of feed costs. A feed cost was found to constitute 63.4% of total production costs. Producers should be given support in terms of technical knowledge and efforts to raise awareness of local people and consumers should be made.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T13:50:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-471fdde346cc418eb0fc0f338a51cf66
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2148-127X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T13:50:50Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
spelling doaj.art-471fdde346cc418eb0fc0f338a51cf662023-02-15T16:10:43ZengTurkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology2148-127X2017-01-0151334210.24925/turjaf.v5i1.33-42.806458Economic Structure and Problems of Trout Enterprises: A Case of FethiyeHicran Ekmekci0Mevlüt Gül1Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarım Ekonomisi Bölümü, 32040 IspartaSüleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarım Ekonomisi Bölümü, 32040 IspartaIn this study, economic structure and problems of trout enterprise were analysed in Fethiye district. It was aimed to determine the input of enterprises engaged in aquaculture at the Fethiye district, calculation of the economic situation, investigation of the market situation and determine problems. In addition possible solutions were tried to be to problems. In the district, it was interviewed with 17 trout enterprises. Data were collected with interviewing face to face by questionnaires. These data was analysed by MS Excel and SPSS programmes. 52.9% of the enterprises were established in the foothill, 35.3% were in open field and 11.8% were established in between valleys. 58.8% of these enterprises were individual enterprises, %17.6 was simple partnership and 23.5% were commercial partnership. The most shares in the active capital were constituted working capital with a rate of 70.3% whereas the share of landlord’s capital was 29.7%. The share of own capital in passive capital was 93.9% and the usage of foreign capital was low (6.1%). The share of variable cost was 83.6% while fixed cost was 16.4% in the total production cost. The main problem of enterprises was the rise of feed costs. A feed cost was found to constitute 63.4% of total production costs. Producers should be given support in terms of technical knowledge and efforts to raise awareness of local people and consumers should be made.http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/806Fethiye ilçesialabalık işletmeleriekonomik yapıMaliyetKar
spellingShingle Hicran Ekmekci
Mevlüt Gül
Economic Structure and Problems of Trout Enterprises: A Case of Fethiye
Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
Fethiye ilçesi
alabalık işletmeleri
ekonomik yapı
Maliyet
Kar
title Economic Structure and Problems of Trout Enterprises: A Case of Fethiye
title_full Economic Structure and Problems of Trout Enterprises: A Case of Fethiye
title_fullStr Economic Structure and Problems of Trout Enterprises: A Case of Fethiye
title_full_unstemmed Economic Structure and Problems of Trout Enterprises: A Case of Fethiye
title_short Economic Structure and Problems of Trout Enterprises: A Case of Fethiye
title_sort economic structure and problems of trout enterprises a case of fethiye
topic Fethiye ilçesi
alabalık işletmeleri
ekonomik yapı
Maliyet
Kar
url http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/806
work_keys_str_mv AT hicranekmekci economicstructureandproblemsoftroutenterprisesacaseoffethiye
AT mevlutgul economicstructureandproblemsoftroutenterprisesacaseoffethiye