Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
Abstract Background Few studies have reported whether a biopsy in emergency gastroscopy (EG) increased the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer (SMGU). This study aims to conduct a mu...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Gastroenterology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01836-z |
_version_ | 1830132880026632192 |
---|---|
author | Quchuan Zhao Tianyu Chi |
author_facet | Quchuan Zhao Tianyu Chi |
author_sort | Quchuan Zhao |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Few studies have reported whether a biopsy in emergency gastroscopy (EG) increased the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer (SMGU). This study aims to conduct a multicenter retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching to verify whether a biopsy in EG increases the risk of rebleeding in patients diagnosed with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU. Methods Using the data for propensity-matched patients, logistic regression models were fitted using rebleeding as the dependent variable. Survival time was defined as the length of time the patient experienced from visiting the emergency department to rebleeding. We used the Kaplan–Meier (KM) method to analyze the 30-day survival of the patients with and without a biopsy after matching, and the log-rank test was performed to examine the differences in survival. Results With the use of propensity score matching, 308 patients who underwent a biopsy in EG were matched with 308 patients who did not. In the five logistic regression models, there were no significant group differences in the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU between the biopsy and no-biopsy groups. The probability of survival was not significantly different between the no-biopsy and biopsy groups. Conclusions In this multicenter, retrospective propensity score matching cohort study, compared with patients without a biopsy, patients with a biopsy during EG had no increased risk of rebleeding, and there was no significant difference in the rate of rebleeding. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T06:43:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4736fd2fa96d4abe91e4f2c9b0a7709c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-230X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T06:43:37Z |
publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Gastroenterology |
spelling | doaj.art-4736fd2fa96d4abe91e4f2c9b0a7709c2022-12-21T21:59:48ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2021-06-012111910.1186/s12876-021-01836-zBiopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort studyQuchuan Zhao0Tianyu Chi1Department of Gastroenterology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical UniversityAbstract Background Few studies have reported whether a biopsy in emergency gastroscopy (EG) increased the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer (SMGU). This study aims to conduct a multicenter retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching to verify whether a biopsy in EG increases the risk of rebleeding in patients diagnosed with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU. Methods Using the data for propensity-matched patients, logistic regression models were fitted using rebleeding as the dependent variable. Survival time was defined as the length of time the patient experienced from visiting the emergency department to rebleeding. We used the Kaplan–Meier (KM) method to analyze the 30-day survival of the patients with and without a biopsy after matching, and the log-rank test was performed to examine the differences in survival. Results With the use of propensity score matching, 308 patients who underwent a biopsy in EG were matched with 308 patients who did not. In the five logistic regression models, there were no significant group differences in the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU between the biopsy and no-biopsy groups. The probability of survival was not significantly different between the no-biopsy and biopsy groups. Conclusions In this multicenter, retrospective propensity score matching cohort study, compared with patients without a biopsy, patients with a biopsy during EG had no increased risk of rebleeding, and there was no significant difference in the rate of rebleeding.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01836-zBiopsyEndoscopyRebleedingAntithromboticNonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
spellingShingle | Quchuan Zhao Tianyu Chi Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study BMC Gastroenterology Biopsy Endoscopy Rebleeding Antithrombotic Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
title | Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with forrest i acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer a multicenter retrospective cohort study |
topic | Biopsy Endoscopy Rebleeding Antithrombotic Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01836-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quchuanzhao biopsyinemergencygastroscopydoesnotincreasetheriskofrebleedinginpatientswithforrestiacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingcombinedwithsuspectedmalignantgastriculceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT tianyuchi biopsyinemergencygastroscopydoesnotincreasetheriskofrebleedinginpatientswithforrestiacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingcombinedwithsuspectedmalignantgastriculceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy |