Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Few studies have reported whether a biopsy in emergency gastroscopy (EG) increased the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer (SMGU). This study aims to conduct a mu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quchuan Zhao, Tianyu Chi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01836-z
_version_ 1830132880026632192
author Quchuan Zhao
Tianyu Chi
author_facet Quchuan Zhao
Tianyu Chi
author_sort Quchuan Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Few studies have reported whether a biopsy in emergency gastroscopy (EG) increased the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer (SMGU). This study aims to conduct a multicenter retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching to verify whether a biopsy in EG increases the risk of rebleeding in patients diagnosed with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU. Methods Using the data for propensity-matched patients, logistic regression models were fitted using rebleeding as the dependent variable. Survival time was defined as the length of time the patient experienced from visiting the emergency department to rebleeding. We used the Kaplan–Meier (KM) method to analyze the 30-day survival of the patients with and without a biopsy after matching, and the log-rank test was performed to examine the differences in survival. Results With the use of propensity score matching, 308 patients who underwent a biopsy in EG were matched with 308 patients who did not. In the five logistic regression models, there were no significant group differences in the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU between the biopsy and no-biopsy groups. The probability of survival was not significantly different between the no-biopsy and biopsy groups. Conclusions In this multicenter, retrospective propensity score matching cohort study, compared with patients without a biopsy, patients with a biopsy during EG had no increased risk of rebleeding, and there was no significant difference in the rate of rebleeding.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T06:43:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4736fd2fa96d4abe91e4f2c9b0a7709c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-230X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T06:43:37Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-4736fd2fa96d4abe91e4f2c9b0a7709c2022-12-21T21:59:48ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2021-06-012111910.1186/s12876-021-01836-zBiopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort studyQuchuan Zhao0Tianyu Chi1Department of Gastroenterology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical UniversityAbstract Background Few studies have reported whether a biopsy in emergency gastroscopy (EG) increased the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer (SMGU). This study aims to conduct a multicenter retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching to verify whether a biopsy in EG increases the risk of rebleeding in patients diagnosed with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU. Methods Using the data for propensity-matched patients, logistic regression models were fitted using rebleeding as the dependent variable. Survival time was defined as the length of time the patient experienced from visiting the emergency department to rebleeding. We used the Kaplan–Meier (KM) method to analyze the 30-day survival of the patients with and without a biopsy after matching, and the log-rank test was performed to examine the differences in survival. Results With the use of propensity score matching, 308 patients who underwent a biopsy in EG were matched with 308 patients who did not. In the five logistic regression models, there were no significant group differences in the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I ANVUGIB combined with SMGU between the biopsy and no-biopsy groups. The probability of survival was not significantly different between the no-biopsy and biopsy groups. Conclusions In this multicenter, retrospective propensity score matching cohort study, compared with patients without a biopsy, patients with a biopsy during EG had no increased risk of rebleeding, and there was no significant difference in the rate of rebleeding.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01836-zBiopsyEndoscopyRebleedingAntithromboticNonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
spellingShingle Quchuan Zhao
Tianyu Chi
Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
BMC Gastroenterology
Biopsy
Endoscopy
Rebleeding
Antithrombotic
Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_full Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_short Biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with Forrest I acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_sort biopsy in emergency gastroscopy does not increase the risk of rebleeding in patients with forrest i acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with suspected malignant gastric ulcer a multicenter retrospective cohort study
topic Biopsy
Endoscopy
Rebleeding
Antithrombotic
Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01836-z
work_keys_str_mv AT quchuanzhao biopsyinemergencygastroscopydoesnotincreasetheriskofrebleedinginpatientswithforrestiacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingcombinedwithsuspectedmalignantgastriculceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tianyuchi biopsyinemergencygastroscopydoesnotincreasetheriskofrebleedinginpatientswithforrestiacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingcombinedwithsuspectedmalignantgastriculceramulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy