Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast.
Providing benefits and payments to participants in health research, either in cash or in kind, is a common but ethically controversial practice. While much literature has concentrated on appropriate levels of benefits or payments, this paper focuses on less well explored ethical issues around the na...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4444261?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1830360272817094656 |
|---|---|
| author | Maureen Njue Sassy Molyneux Francis Kombe Salim Mwalukore Dorcas Kamuya Vicki Marsh |
| author_facet | Maureen Njue Sassy Molyneux Francis Kombe Salim Mwalukore Dorcas Kamuya Vicki Marsh |
| author_sort | Maureen Njue |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Providing benefits and payments to participants in health research, either in cash or in kind, is a common but ethically controversial practice. While much literature has concentrated on appropriate levels of benefits or payments, this paper focuses on less well explored ethical issues around the nature of study benefits, drawing on views of community members living close to an international health research centre in Kenya.The consultation, including 90 residents purposively chosen to reflect diversity, used a two-stage deliberative process. Five half-day workshops were each followed by between two and four small group discussions, within a two week period (total 16 groups). During workshops and small groups, facilitators used participatory methods to share information, and promote reflection and debate on ethical issues around types of benefits, including cash, goods, medical and community benefits. Data from workshop and field notes, and voice recordings of small group discussions, were managed using Nvivo 10 and analysed using a Framework Analysis approach.The methods generated in-depth discussion with high levels of engagement. Particularly for the most-poor, under-compensation of time in research carries risks of serious harm. Cash payments may best support compensation of costs experienced; while highly valued, goods and medical benefits may be more appropriate as an 'appreciation' or incentive for participation. Community benefits were seen as important in supporting but not replacing individual-level benefits, and in building trust in researcher-community relations. Cash payments were seen to have higher risks of undue inducement, commercialising relationships and generating family conflicts than other benefits, particularly where payments are high. Researchers should consider and account for burdens families may experience when children are involved in research. Careful context-specific research planning and skilled and consistent communication about study benefits and payments are important, including in mitigating potential negative effects. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:14:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-473cea49ed4d451b82ab0e25e3df82e7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:14:06Z |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-473cea49ed4d451b82ab0e25e3df82e72022-12-21T19:55:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012784210.1371/journal.pone.0127842Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast.Maureen NjueSassy MolyneuxFrancis KombeSalim MwalukoreDorcas KamuyaVicki MarshProviding benefits and payments to participants in health research, either in cash or in kind, is a common but ethically controversial practice. While much literature has concentrated on appropriate levels of benefits or payments, this paper focuses on less well explored ethical issues around the nature of study benefits, drawing on views of community members living close to an international health research centre in Kenya.The consultation, including 90 residents purposively chosen to reflect diversity, used a two-stage deliberative process. Five half-day workshops were each followed by between two and four small group discussions, within a two week period (total 16 groups). During workshops and small groups, facilitators used participatory methods to share information, and promote reflection and debate on ethical issues around types of benefits, including cash, goods, medical and community benefits. Data from workshop and field notes, and voice recordings of small group discussions, were managed using Nvivo 10 and analysed using a Framework Analysis approach.The methods generated in-depth discussion with high levels of engagement. Particularly for the most-poor, under-compensation of time in research carries risks of serious harm. Cash payments may best support compensation of costs experienced; while highly valued, goods and medical benefits may be more appropriate as an 'appreciation' or incentive for participation. Community benefits were seen as important in supporting but not replacing individual-level benefits, and in building trust in researcher-community relations. Cash payments were seen to have higher risks of undue inducement, commercialising relationships and generating family conflicts than other benefits, particularly where payments are high. Researchers should consider and account for burdens families may experience when children are involved in research. Careful context-specific research planning and skilled and consistent communication about study benefits and payments are important, including in mitigating potential negative effects.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4444261?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Maureen Njue Sassy Molyneux Francis Kombe Salim Mwalukore Dorcas Kamuya Vicki Marsh Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast. PLoS ONE |
| title | Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast. |
| title_full | Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast. |
| title_fullStr | Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast. |
| title_short | Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast. |
| title_sort | benefits in cash or in kind a community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the kenyan coast |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4444261?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maureennjue benefitsincashorinkindacommunityconsultationontypesofbenefitsinhealthresearchonthekenyancoast AT sassymolyneux benefitsincashorinkindacommunityconsultationontypesofbenefitsinhealthresearchonthekenyancoast AT franciskombe benefitsincashorinkindacommunityconsultationontypesofbenefitsinhealthresearchonthekenyancoast AT salimmwalukore benefitsincashorinkindacommunityconsultationontypesofbenefitsinhealthresearchonthekenyancoast AT dorcaskamuya benefitsincashorinkindacommunityconsultationontypesofbenefitsinhealthresearchonthekenyancoast AT vickimarsh benefitsincashorinkindacommunityconsultationontypesofbenefitsinhealthresearchonthekenyancoast |